Philosophy of the future

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Contents

  1. Issues and positions
    1. Risk
    2. Technological growth
    3. Artificial intelligence
  2. My thoughts
  3. Annotated bibliography
    1. Bostrom, N. (2002). Anthropic Bias: Observation selection effects in science and philosophy.
    2. Bostrom, N. (2003). Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?
    3. Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies.
    4. More articles to do
  4. Links and encyclopedia articles
    1. SEP
    2. IEP
    3. Wikipedia
    4. Others
  5. References

Issues and positions

Risk

TODO.

Technological growth

TODO.

Artificial intelligence

TODO.

My thoughts

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Annotated bibliography

Bostrom, N. (2002). Anthropic Bias: Observation selection effects in science and philosophy.

My thoughts


Bostrom, N. (2003). Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?

My thoughts


Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies.

My thoughts


SEP

IEP

Wikipedia

Others

References

Bostrom, N. (2002). Anthropic Bias: Observation selection effects in science and philosophy. Routledge.

———. (2003). Are you living in a computer simulation? Philosophical Quarterly, 53, 243–255.

———. (2011). A patch for the simulation argument. Analysis, 71, 54–61.


  1. Bostrom (2002).

  2. Bostrom (2003).

  3. Bostrom (2011).