References

Aaronson, S. (2001). Letter to James Randi. https://www.scottaaronson.com/writings/randi.html

———. (2005). The complexity of agreement. Proceedings of ACM STOC, 634.

———. (2011). Why philosophers should care about computational complexity. https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.1791

———. (2013). The ghost in the quantum Turing machine. https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0159

Abad, L. A. & Khalifa, K. (2015). What are stylized facts? Journal of Economic Methodology, 22, 143–156.

Achenbach, J. (2015). Why do many reasonable people doubt science? National Geographic. March 25, 2015. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2015/03/science-doubters-climate-change-vaccinations-gmos

Adamson, P. (2015). Philosophy in the Islamic World: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.

Adlam, E., Hance, J. R., Hossenfelder, S., & Palmer, T. N. (2023). Taxonomy for physics beyond quantum mechanics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12293

Afriat, A. (2013). Weyl’s gauge argument. Foundations of Physics, 43, 699–705. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/9597/

Agresti, A. & Coull, B. A. (1998). Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions. The American Statistician, 52, 119–126.

Aguirre, A., Foster, B., & Merali, Z. (2016). Trick Or Truth?: The mysterious connection between physics and mathematics. Springer.

Aharonov, Y. & Bohm, D. (1959). Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory. Physical Review, 115, 485–491. https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.115.485

Ahmed, A. & Caulton, A. (2014). Causal decision theory and EPR correlations. Synthese, 191, 4315–4352. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/10992/

Aifer, M. et al. (2023). Thermodynamic linear algebra. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05660

Aimè, C. (2022). Muon collider physics summary. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07256

Alain, G. & Bengio, Y. (2016). Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probes. https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.01644

Albert, D. Z. (1992). Quantum Mechanics and Experience. Harvard University Press.

Albrecht, A. & Steinhardt, P. J. (1982). Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking. Physics Review Letters, 48, 1220–1223. https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1220

Aldrich, J. (1997). R. A. Fisher and the making of maximum likelihood 1912-1922. Statistical Science, 12, 162–176.

Allain, R. (2013). What’s wrong with the scientific method? Wired. April 1, 2013. https://www.wired.com/2013/04/whats-wrong-with-the-scientific-method/

Allori, V. (2022). What is it like to be a relativistic GRW theory? Or: Quantum mechanics and relativity, still in conflict after all these years. Foundations of Physics, 52, 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-022-00595-5

Allori, V., Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zanghì, N. (2002). Seven steps towards the classical world. Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics, 4, 482. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0112005

Amari, S. (1993). Backpropagation and stochastic gradient descent method. Neurocomputing, 5, 185–196.

———. (1998). Natural gradient works efficiently in learning. Neural Computation, 10, 251–276.

———. (2016). Information Geometry and Its Applications. Springer Japan.

Ananthaswamy, A. (2021). This simple experiment could challenge standard quantum theory. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/this-simple-experiment-could-challenge-standard-quantum-theory/

Anderson, C. (2008). The End of Theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired. June 23, 2008. https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/

Anderson, J. A. & Rosenfeld, E. (1998). Talking Nets: An oral history of neural networks. MIT Press.

Anderson, P. W. (1972). More is different. Science, 177, 393–396. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/177/4047/393

Andrews, M. (2018). Does natural selection explain why you exist? Assessing Terrence Deacon’s hierarchic transitions. https://evolution-institute.org/does-natural-selection-explain-why-you-exist/

———. (2021). The math is not the territory: Navigating the free energy principle. Biology & Philosophy, 36, 1–19. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/18974/

———. (2023). The devil in the data: Machine learning & the theory-free ideal. https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/22690/1/ML_Atheoreticity.pdf

Andrews, P. W. & Thomson Jr, J. A. (2009). The bright side of being blue: Depression as an adaptation for analyzing complex problems. Psychological Review, 116, 620.

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1959). An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Harper & Row.

Anzivino, C., Vaibhav, V., & Zaccone, A. (2024). Random close packing of binary hard spheres predicts the stability of atomic nuclei. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.11268

Arbey, A. & Mahmoudi, F. (2021). Dark matter and the early Universe: a review. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.11488

Aristotle. (1993). Posterior Analytics. (J. Barnes, Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Originally written in 350 BCE).

———. (2007). Posterior Analytics. (G. R. G. Mure, Trans.). (Originally written in 350 BCE). https://web.archive.org/web/20070427034930/http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/a8poa/

Arkani-Hamed, N., Cachazo, F., & Kaplan, J. (2008). What is the simplest quantum field theory? https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.1446

Armstrong, S., Sotala, K., & OhEigeartaigh, S. S. (2014). The errors, insights and lessons of famous AI predictions–and what they mean for the future. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 26, 317–342. https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/FAIC.pdf

Arntzenius, F. (2012). Space, Time, and Stuff. Oxford University Press.

Aronson, D. (2007). Evidence-Based Technical Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

Arras, K. O. (1998). An introduction to error propagation: Derivation, meaning and examples of C_y = F_xC_xF_x^⊤. EPFL-ASL-TR-98-01 R3. http://srl.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/papers/arrasTR98.pdf

Arulkumaran, K., Deisenroth, M. P., Brundage, M., & Bharath, A. A. (2017). Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Brief Survey. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 34, 26–38.

Arute, F. et al. (2019). Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature, 574, 505–510. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1666-5

Asch, M. et al. (2018). Big data and extreme-scale computing: Pathways to Convergence-Toward a shaping strategy for a future software and data ecosystem for scientific inquiry. The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 32, 435–479.

Aschenbrenner, L. (2024). Situational Awareness: The decade ahead. https://situational-awareness.ai/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/situationalawareness.pdf

Atherton, M. (1996). Lady Mary shepherd’s case against George Berkeley. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 4, 347–366.

Atiyah, M. et al. (1994). Responses to "Theoretical Mathematics: Toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics", by A. Jaffe and F. Quinn. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 30, 178–207. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9404229

ATLAS and CMS Collaborations. (2011). Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011. CMS-NOTE-2011-005, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-11. http://cds.cern.ch/record/1379837

ATLAS Collaboration. (2012a). Combined search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Physical Review D, 86, 032003. https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0319

———. (2012b). Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Physics Letters B, 716, 1–29. https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7214

ATLAS Statistics Forum. (2011). The CLs method: Information for conference speakers. http://www.pp.rhul.ac.uk/~cowan/stat/cls/CLsInfo.pdf

Aumann, R. J. (1976). Agreeing to disagree. The Annals of Statistics, 4, 1236–9.

Auspitz, J. L. (1994). The wasp leaves the bottle: Charles Sanders Peirce. The American Scholar, 63, 602–618.

Auyang, S. Y. (1995). How Is Quantum Field Theory Possible? Oxford University Press.

———. (2000). Mathematics and reality: Two notions of spacetime in the analytic and constructionist views of gauge field theories. Philosophy of Science, 67, S482–S494.

Awodey, S. (2014). Structuralism, invariance, and univalence. Philosophia Mathematica, 22, 1–11.

Awodey, S. & Carus, A. W. (2007). Carnap’s dream: Gödel, Wittgenstein, and Logical Syntax. Synthese, 159, 23–45. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-006-9066-4

Awodey, S. & Forssell, H. (2013). First-order logical duality. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 164, 319–348.

Awodey, S. & Klein, C. (2004). Carnap Brought Home: The View from Jena. Open Court.

Axelrod, R. (1980a). Effective choice in the prisoner’s dilemma. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 3–25.

———. (1980b). More effective choice in the prisoner’s dilemma. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 379–403.

Ayars, A. (2016). Can model-free reinforcement learning explain deontological moral judgments? Cognition, 150, 232–242.

Ayer, A. J. (1936). Language, Truth, and Logic. London: Victor Gollancz Ltd.

Ayer, A. J. & Magee, B. (1978). Logical positivism and its legacy. Men of Ideas. (BBC television seires). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cnRJGs08hE

Aytekin, C. (2022). Neural networks are decision trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05189

Azzouni, J. (2000). Knowledge and Reference in Empirical Science. Routledge.

———. (2015). Nominalism, the nonexistence of mathematical objects. In E. Davis & P. Davis (Eds.), Mathematics, Substance and Surmise (pp. 133–145). Springer.

Bacciagaluppi, G. & Valentini, A. (2009). Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference. Cambridge University Press. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0609184

Bach, F. (2022). Learning Theory from First Principles. (Draft). https://www.di.ens.fr/~fbach/ltfp_book.pdf

———. (2024). Scaling laws of optimization. https://francisbach.com/scaling-laws-of-optimization/

Baez, J. C. (2002). The octonions. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 39, 145–205. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0105155

———. (2011). Division algebras and quantum theory. Foundations of Physics, 42, 819–855. https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.5690

———. (2016). Struggles with the continuum. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.01421

———. (2018). Getting to the bottom of Noether’s theorem. Talk given at The Philosophy and Physics of Noether’s Theorems, University of Notre Dame, October 6, 2018. https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/noether/noether_web.pdf

———. (2020). The tenfold way. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.14234

Baez, J. C. & Dolan, J. (1995). Higher‐dimensional algebra and topological quantum field theory. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 36, 6073–6105. https://arxiv.org/abs/q-alg/9503002

Baez, J. C. & Huerta, J. (2009a). Division algebras and supersymmetry I. https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.0551

———. (2009b). The algebra of grand unified theories. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 47, 483–552. https://arxiv.org/abs/0904.1556

———. (2010). Division algebras and supersymmetry II. https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.3436

———. (2011). An invitation to higher gauge theory. General Relativity and Gravitation, 43, 2335–92. https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.4485

Baez, J. C. & Muniain, J. P. (1994). Gauge Fields, Knots and Gravity. World Scientific.

Baez, J. C. & Schreiber, U. (2005). Higher gauge theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0511710

Baez, J. C., Segal, I., & Zhou, Z. (1992). Introduction to Algebraic and Constructive Quantum Field Theory. Princeton University Press. https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/bsz.html

Baez, J. C. & Stay, M. (2009). Physics, topology, logic, and computation: A Rosetta Stone. https://arxiv.org/abs/0903.0340

Baggott, J. (2013). Farewell to Reality: How modern physics has betrayed the search for scientific truth. Pegasus Books.

Bahcall, N. A. (2015). Dark matter universe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 12243–5. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1516944112

Bahcall, N. A., Ostriker, J. P., Perlmutter, S., & Steinhardt, P. J. (1999). The cosmic triangle: Revealing the state of the universe. Science, 284, 1481–8. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9906463

Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2015). Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. International Conference on Learning Representations, 3rd, 2015. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.0473

Bahri, Y. et al. (2020). Statistical mechanics of deep learning. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 11, 501–528.

Bailey, A. & O’Brien, D. (2014). Hume’s Critique of Religion: ’Sick Men’s Dreams’. Springer.

Bain, J. (2000). Against particle/field duality: Asymptotic particle states and interpolating fields in interacting QFT, or Who’s afraid of Haag’s theorem? Erkenntnis, 53, 375–406. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1026482100470.pdf

———. (2013a). Effective field theories. In R. Batterman (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics (pp. 224–254). Oxford University Press.

———. (2013b). Emergence in effective field theories. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3, 257–273.

Bajnok, B. (2013). An Invitation to Abstract Mathematics. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4614-6636-9

Baker, D. J. (2009). Against field interpretations of quantum field theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60, 585–609. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/4350/

Balasubramanian, V. (1996a). A geometric formulation of Occam’s razor for inference of parametric distributions. https://arxiv.org/abs/adap-org/9601001

———. (1996b). Statistical inference, Occam’s razor and statistical mechanics on the space of probability distributions. https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9601030

Balestriero, R., Pesenti, J., & LeCun, Y. (2021). Learning in high dimension always amounts to extrapolation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.09485

Banerjee, S., Agarwal, A., & Singla, S. (2024). LLMs will always hallucinate, and we need to live with this. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05746

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.

Barbado, L. C. & Del Santo, F. (2023). On playing gods: The fallacy of the many-worlds interpretation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.03467

Bargmann, V. & Wigner, E. P. (1948). Group theoretical discussion of relativistic wave equations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 34, 211–223.

Barrett, J. (2004). On the cognitive status of our best physical theories. http://faculty.sites.uci.edu/jeffreybarrett/articles/

Barrett, J. A. (2011). Everett’s pure wave mechanics and the notion of worlds. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1, 277–302. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13194-011-0023-9

———. (2016). Quantum Worlds. Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology, 20, 45–60.

———. (2019). The Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford University Press.

Bassi, A. (2005). Collapse models: analysis of the free particle dynamics. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 38, 3173. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0410222

Batchelor, S. (1998). Buddhism Without Beliefs. New York: Riverhead Books.

Batson, J., Haaf, C. G., Kahn, Y., & Roberts, D. A. (2021). Topological obstructions to autoencoding. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.08380

Batterman, R. W. (2003). Falling cats, parallel parking and polarized light. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34, 527–557. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/794/

Battiloro, C. et al. (2024). E(n) equivariant topological neural networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15429

Baum, S.D. et al. (2019). Long-term trajectories of human civilization. Foresight, 21, 55–83.

Baumann, D. (2009). TASI lectures on inflation. https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.5424

Baydin, A.G. et al. (2019). Etalumis: Bringing probabilistic programming to scientific simulators at scale. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.03382

Bayes, T. (1736). An Introduction to the Doctrine of Fluxions, and a Defence of the Mathematicians Against the Objections of the Author of The Analyst. London. (published anonymously).

Becker, A. (2018). What is Real? The unfinished quest for the meaning of quantum physics. Basic Books.

Bedau, M. A. (1997). Weak emergence. Philosophical Perspectives, 11, 375–399.

Behnke, O., Kröninger, K., Schott, G., & Schörner-Sadenius, T. (2013). Data Analysis in High Energy Physics: A Practical Guide to Statistical Methods. Wiley.

Belinkov, Y. (2022). Probing classifiers: Promises, shortcomings, and advances. Computational Linguistics, 48, 207–219.

Belkin, M. (2021). Fit without fear: remarkable mathematical phenomena of deep learning through the prism of interpolation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.14368

Belkin, M., Hsu, D., Ma, S., & Mandal, S. (2019). Reconciling modern machine-learning practice and the classical bias-variance trade-off. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 15849–15854. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.11118

Bell, J. S. (1955). Time reversal in field theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 231, 479–495.

———. (1964). On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics, 1, 195–200. https://journals.aps.org/ppf/pdf/10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195

———. (1966). On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 38, 447. http://fy.chalmers.se/~delsing/QI/Bell-RMP-66.pdf

———. (1984). Beables for quantum field theory. CERN-TH.4035/84. https://cds.cern.ch/record/190753/files/198411046.pdf

———. (2004a). Are there quantum jumps? In Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed., pp. 201–212). Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1987).

———. (2004b). Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1987).

Bellman, R. (1952). On the theory of dynamic programming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 38, 716–719.

Bender, E. M. & Koller, A. (2020). Climbing towards NLU: On meaning, form, and understanding in the age of data. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 58, 5185–5198. https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.463.pdf

Bengio, Y. (2009). Learning deep architectures for AI. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 2, 1–127. https://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~lisa/pointeurs/TR1312.pdf

Bengio, Y. et al. (2025). International AI Safety Report. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17805

Benjamin, D.J. et al. (2017). Redefine statistical significance. PsyArXiv. July 22, 2017. https://psyarxiv.com/mky9j/

Benjamini, Y. et al. (2021). The ASA president’s task force statement on statistical significance and replicability. Annals of Applied Statistics, 16, 1–2. https://magazine.amstat.org/blog/2021/08/01/task-force-statement-p-value/

Bennett, K. (2015). There is no special problem with metaphysics. Philosophical Studies, 173, 21–37.

Bensusan, H. (2000). Is machine learning experimental philosophy of science? In ECAI2000 Workshop notes on scientific Reasoning in Artificial Intelligence and the Philosophy of Science (pp. 9–14).

Berenstain, N. (2014). Necessary laws and chemical kinds. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 92, 631–647. https://philpapers.org/rec/BERNLA

Berger, J. O. (2003). Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman have agreed on testing? Statistical Science, 18, 1–32.

Berger, J. O. & Wolpert, R. L. (1988). The Likelihood Principle (2nd ed.). Haywood, CA: The Institute of Mathematical Statistics.

Berlin, I. (1994). A message to the twenty-first century. (Lecture after he received the honorary degree of Doctor of Laws at the University of Toronto). http://www.sjpcommunications.org/images/uploads/documents/Isaiah_Berlin.pdf

———. (1999). The Roots of Romanticism. Princeton University Press. (Originally published in 1965).

Bertolini, M. (2022). Lectures on supersymmetry. https://www.sissa.it/tpp/phdsection/OnlineResources/6/susycourse.pdf

Bertsch, A., Alon, U., Neubig, G., & Gormley, M. R. (2023). Unlimiformer: Long-range transformers with unlimited length input. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01625

Bérut, A. et al. (2012). Experimental verification of Landauer’s principle linking information and thermodynamics. Nature, 483, 187–189. doi:10.1038/nature10872.

Bérut, A., Petrosyan, A., & Ciliberto, S. (2015). Information and thermodynamics: Experimental verification of Landauer’s erasure principle. https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.06537

Bès, A. (2002). A survey of arithmetical definability. In A tribute to Maurice Boffa, Soc.Math (pp. 1–54). Belgique. http://lacl.u-pec.fr/bes/publi/survey.pdf

Bès, A. & Choffrut, C. (2022). Decidability of definability issues in the theory of real addition. Fundamenta Informaticae, 188, 15–39. https://fi.episciences.org/10753

Bhargava, A., Witkowski, C., Shah, M., & Thomson, M. (2023). What’s the magic word? A control theory of LLM prompting. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04444

Bhaskar, R. (2008). A Realist Theory of Science. Routledge.

Bhattiprolu, P. N., Martin, S. P., & Wells, J. D. (2020). Criteria for projected discovery and exclusion sensitivities of counting experiments. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.07249

Bikchandani, S., Riley, J. G., & Hirshleifer, J. (2013). The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information. Cambridge University Press.

Billings, D. et al. (2003). Approximating game-theoretic optimal strategies for full-scale poker. IJCAI, 3, 661. http://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/~duane/publications/pdf/2003ijcai.pdf

Billings, D., Davidson, A., Schaeffer, J., & Szafron, D. (2002). The challenge of poker. Artificial Intelligence, 134, 201–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00130-8

Binmore, K. (2011). Natural Justice. Oxford University Press.

Bird, A. (2018). The metaphysics of natural kinds. Synthese, 195, 1397–1426. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/38555439/Metaphysics_Natural_Kinds_final-libre.pdf

Bird, A. & Tobin, E. (2015). Natural kinds. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-kinds/

Birnbaum, A. (1962). On the foundations of statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57, 269–326.

Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer.

Bjornsson, G. & Finlay, S. (2010). Metaethical contextualism defended. Ethics, 121, 7–36.

Blachowicz, J. (2009). How science textbooks treat scientific method: A philosopher’s perspective. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60, 303–344.

———. (2016). There is no scientific method. The New York Times. July 4, 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/04/opinion/there-is-no-scientific-method.html

Black, M. (1964). The gap between "is" and "should". Philosophical Review, 73, 165–181.

Blackmore, S. J. (1996). Near-death experiences. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 89, 73–76.

———. (1997). Probability misjudgment and belief in the paranormal: A newspaper survey. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 683–689.

Blancke, S. & Boudry, M. (2022). Pseudoscience as a negative outcome of scientific dialogue: A pragmatic-naturalistic approach to the demarcation problem. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science.

Blondel, M., Martins, A. F., & Niculae, V. (2020). Learning with Fenchel-Young losses. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21, 1–69.

Bloom, H. (1994). The Western Canon. Harcourt Brace.

Blumberg, A. E. & Feigl, H. (1931). Logical positivism: A new movement in European philosophy. The Journal of Philosophy, 28, 281.

Bodhi. (2005). In the Buddha’s Words: An anthology of discourses from the Pali Canon. Wisdom Publications.

Bogatskiy, A. et al. (2023). Explainable equivariant neural networks for particle physics: PELICAN. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16506

Boghossian, P. (2006). Fear of Knowledge. Oxford University Press.

Bohm, D. (1952). A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ’hidden’ variables, I and II. Physical Review, 85, 166–193.

———. (1953). Proof that probability density approaches |ψ|² in causal interpretation of quantum theory. Physical Review, 89, 458–466.

Bohm, D. & Aharonov, Y. (1957). Discussion of experimental proof for the paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky. Physical Review, 108, 1070.

Bohm, D. & Hiley, B. J. (1993). The Undivided Universe. London: Routledge.

Boisselle, L. N. (2016). Decolonizing science and science education in a postcolonial space (Trinidad, a developing Caribbean nation, illustrates). Sage Open, 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016635257

Bokulich, P. (2011). Hempel’s dilemma and domains of physics. Analysis, 71, 646–651.

Bonevac, D. (2003). Deduction: Introductory to Symbolic Logic (2nd ed.). Blackwell.

Bong, K.W. et al. (2020). A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradox. Nature Physics, 16, 1199–1205. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.05607

Boolos, G. (1984). To be is to be the value of a variable (or to be some values of some variables). Journal of Philosophy, 81, 430–449. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2026308

Borcherds, R. E. & Barnard, A. (2002). Lectures on quantum field theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0204014

Borg, E. (2007). Minimal Semantics. Oxford University Press.

Borges, J. L. (1998). Collected Fictions. (A. Hurley, Trans.). Penguin Group.

Born, M. (1953). The interpretation of quantum mechanics. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4, 95–106. https://www.jstor.org/stable/685986

Bostrom, N. (2002). Anthropic Bias: Observation selection effects in science and philosophy. Routledge.

———. (2003). Are you living in a computer simulation? Philosophical Quarterly, 53, 243–255.

———. (2005). The fable of the dragon-tyrant. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 273–277. https://www.nickbostrom.com/fable/dragon.html

———. (2011). A patch for the simulation argument. Analysis, 71, 54–61.

———. (2013). Existential risk prevention as global priority. Global Policy, 4, 15–31. https://www.existential-risk.org/concept.pdf

———. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press.

———. (2019). The vulnerable world hypothesis,. Global Policy, 10, 455–476. https://nickbostrom.com/papers/vulnerable.pdf

Bottou, L. (1998). Stochastic gradient descent tricks. In G. B. Orr & K. R. Muller (Eds.), Neural Networks: Tricks of the trade. Springer. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/stochastic-gradient-tricks/

Boudry, M. & Pigliucci, M. (2018). Science Unlimited? The Challenges of Scientism. University of Chicago Press.

Boughn, S. (2018). Making sense of the many worlds interpretation. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.08587

Bousquet, O. et al. (2021). A theory of universal learning. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (pp. 532–541). https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3406325.3451087

Bowling, M., Burch, N., Johanson, M., & Tammelin, O. (2015). Heads-up limit hold’em poker is solved. Science, 347, 145–149. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6218/145

Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 791–799.

Boyd, R. N. (1983). On the current status of the issue of scientific realism. Erkenntnis, 19, 45–90.

Brading, K. A. (2002). Which symmetry? Noether, Weyl, and conservation of electric charge. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 33, 3–22. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.569.106&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Bradley, T. D. (2018). What is applied category theory? https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.05923

Bradley, T. D., Terilla, J., & Vlassopoulos, Y. (2021). An enriched category theory of language: from syntax to semantics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.07890

Brandom, R. (1994). Making it Explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Harvard University Press.

———. (2000). Rorty and His Critics. Blackwell Publishers.

Brans, C. H. (1988). Bell’s theorem does not eliminate fully causal hidden variables. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 27, 219–226. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00670750

Brassier, R. (2007). Nihil Unbound: Enlightenment and Extinction. Palgrave Macmillan.

Brent, J. (1993). Charles Sanders Peirce: A Life. Indiana University Press.

Bright, L. K. & Heesen, R. (2023). To be scientific is to be communist. Social Epistemology, 37, 1–10. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02691728.2022.2156308

Bronstein, M. M., Bruna, J., Cohen, T., & Velickovic, P. (2021). Geometric deep learning: Grids, groups, graphs, geodesics, and gauges. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.13478

Broughton, M. et al. (2020). TensorFlow Quantum: A software framework for quantum machine learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.02989

Brouwer, L. E. J. (1908). Unreliability of the logical principles. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.01113

Brown, L. D., Cai, T. T., & DasGupta, A. (2001). Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Statistical Science, 16, 101–133. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ss/1009213286

Brown, M. R. & Hiley, B. J. (2004). Schrödinger revisited: An algebraic approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0005026

Brown, N. (2020). Equilibrium finding for large adversarial imperfect-information games. (Ph.D. thesis). http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~noamb/thesis.pdf

Brown, N., Bakhtin, A., Lerer, A., & Gong, Q. (2020). Combining deep reinforcement learning and search for imperfect-information games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.13544

Brown, N., Lerer, A., Gross, S., & Sandholm, T. (2019). Deep counterfactual regret minimization. https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.00164

Brown, N. & Sandholm, T. (2017). Safe and nested subgame solving for imperfect-information games. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02955

———. (2018). Superhuman AI for heads-up no-limit poker: Libratus beats top professionals. Science, 359, 418–424. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/359/6374/418

———. (2019a). Solving imperfect-information games via discounted regret minimization. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33, 1829–1836. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.04040

———. (2019b). Superhuman AI for multiplayer poker. Science, 365, 885–890. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/365/6456/885

Brown, S. R. (2008). Moral Virtue and Nature: A defense of ethical naturalism. Continuum.

Brown, T.B. et al. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. (Paper on the GPT-3 model by OpenAI). https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165

Browning, J. & LeCun, Y. (2022). AI and the limits of language. https://www.noemamag.com/ai-and-the-limits-of-language/

Bryant, A. K. (2017). What’s metaphysics all about? http://www.amandakbryant.com/uploads/3/9/6/3/39633161/bryant_whats_metaphysics.pdf

Bub, J. (2019). ’Two Dogmas’ redux. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.06240

Bubeck, S. et al. (2023). Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712

Bubeck, S. & Sellke, M. (2023). A universal law of robustness via isoperimetry. Journal of the ACM, 70, 1–18. https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3578580

Buchholz, D. (1998). Current trends in axiomatic quantum field theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9811233

Buchholz, D. & Dybalski, W. (2005). Scattering in relativistic quantum field theory: basic concepts, tools, and results. https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0509047v3

Buck, R. C. & Cohen, R. S. (1971). PSA 1970: In Memory of Rudolf Carnap Proceedings of the 1970 Biennial Meeting Philosophy of Science Association. Springer Netherlands.

Buckingham, E. (1914). On physically similar systems; Illustrations of the use of dimensional equations. Physical Review, 4, 345–376.

Bueno, O. (1999). What is structural empiricism? Scientific change in an empiricist setting. Erkenntnis, 50, 55–81.

———. (2010). A defense of second-order logic. Axiomathes, 20, 365–383. https://web.as.miami.edu/personal/obueno/Site/Online_Papers_files/SecnOrd_FINAL.pdf

———. (2011). Structural empiricism, again. In P. Bokulich & A. Bokulich (Eds.), Scientific Structuralism (pp. 81–103). Dordrecht: Springer.

———. (2013). Nominalism in the philosophy of mathematics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nominalism-mathematics/

Bulatov, A., Kuratov, Y., & Burtsev, M. S. (2022). Recurrent memory transformer. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.06881

———. (2023). Scaling transformer to 1M tokens and beyond with RMT. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.11062

Bunge, M. (1955a). Strife about complementarity (I). The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 6, 1–12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/685570

———. (1955b). Strife about complementarity (II). The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 6, 141–154. https://www.jstor.org/stable/685522

———. (1971). Is scientific metaphysics possible? The Journal of Philosophy, 68, 507–520.

———. (1974). Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Volume 1: Sense and Reference. Reidel.

———. (1991a). The power and limits of reduction. In E. Agazzi (Ed.), The Problem of Reductionism in Science (pp. 31–49). Dordrecht: Springer.

———. (1991b). What is science? Does it matter to distinguish it from pseudoscience? A reply to my commentators. New Ideas in Psychology, 9, 245–283. https://www.hpsst.com/uploads/6/2/9/3/62931075/bunge__1991__science___pseudoscience.pdf

———. (1996). Finding Philosophy in Social Science. Yale University Press.

———. (2001). Philosophy in Crisis: The Need for Reconstruction. Prometheus Books.

———. (2010). Mind and Matter: A Philosophical Inquiry. Dordrecht: Springer.

———. (2011). Knowledge: Genuine and bogus. Science & Education, 20, 411–438.

———. (2012). Evaluating Philosophies. Springer.

Burch, N. (2018). Time and Space: Why imperfect information games are hard. University of Alberta. (Ph.D. thesis). https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/db44409f-b373-427d-be83-cace67d33c41/view/bcb00dca-39e6-4c43-9ec2-65026a50135e/Burch_Neil_E_201712_PhD.pdf

Burch, N., Lanctot, M., Szafron, D., & Gibson, R. (2012). Efficient Monte Carlo counterfactual regret minimization in games with many player actions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 25. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2012/file/3df1d4b96d8976ff5986393e8767f5b2-Paper.pdf

Burch, N., Moravcik, M., & Schmid, M. (2019). Revisiting CFR+ and alternating updates. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 64, 429–443. https://www.jair.org/index.php/jair/article/view/11370

Burgess, J. P. (1983). Why I am not a nominalist. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 24, 93–105.

Burke, W. L. (1985). Applied Differential Geometry. Cambridge University Press.

Butterfield, J. (2014). Reduction, emergence, and renormalization. The Journal of Philosophy, 111, 5–49. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4354v1

Butterfield, J. & Bouatta, N. (2015). Renormalization for philosophers. Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics, 104, 437–485. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4532

Button, T. & Walsh, S. (2018). Philosophy and Model Theory. Oxford University Press.

Caballero, E., Gupta, K., Rish, I., & Krueger, D. (2022). Broken neural scaling laws. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.14891

Cabibbo, N. (1963). Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays. Physical Review Letters, 10, 531–533. https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.531

Cadwalladr, C. (2017). Daniel Dennett: I begrudge every hour I have to spend worrying about politics. The Guardian. February 12, 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/feb/12/daniel-dennett-politics-bacteria-bach-back-dawkins-trump-interview

Caldeira, J. & Nord, B. (2020). Deeply uncertain: comparing methods of uncertainty quantification in deep learning algorithms. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 2, 015002. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2632-2153/aba6f3

Calin, O. & Udriste, C. (2014). Geometric Modeling in Probability and Statistics. Springer Switzerland.

Camus, A. (1988). The Stranger. (M. Ward, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books. (Originally published in 1942 as L’Étranger).

Canatar, A., Bordelon, B., & Pehlevan, C. (2020). Spectral bias and task-model alignment explain generalization in kernel regression and infinitely wide neural networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.13198

Candelas, P., Horowitz, G. T., Strominger, A., & Witten, E. (1985). Vacuum configurations for superstrings. Nuclear Physics B, 258, 46–74.

Cañizares-Esguerra, J. (2022). Rethinking the "Western" revolution in science. Science, 376, 467. https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.abo5229

Cantwell, G. T. (2022). Approximate sampling and estimation of partition functions using neural networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.10423

Cao, C., Hu, H., Li, J., & Schwarz, W. H. E. (2019). Physical origin of chemical periodicities in the system of elements. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 91, 1969–1999. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/pac-2019-0901/html

Cao, T. Y. (1999). Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press.

———. (2003). Structural realism and the interpretation of quantum field theory. Synthese, 136, 3–24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20117384

———. (2016). The Englert-Brout-Higgs mechanism: An unfinished project. International Journal of Modern Physics A, 31, 1630061.

Capdevilla, R., Curtin, D., Kahn, Y., & Krnjaic, G. (2021). A no-lose theorem for discovering the new physics of (g − 2)_μ at muon colliders. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.10334

Carcassi, G., Calderon, F., & Aidala, C. A. (2023). The unphysicality of Hilbert spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.06669

Carcassi, G., Maccone, L., & Aidala, C. A. (2020). The four postulates of quantum mechanics are three. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.11007

Carnap, R. (1934). On the character of philophical problems. Philosophy of Science, 1, 5–19.

———. (1936). Testability and meaning. Philosophy of Science, 3, 419–471.

———. (1937a). Logical Syntax of Language. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. (Originally published in German in 1934).

———. (1937b). Testability and meaning–continued. Philosophy of Science, 4, 1–40.

———. (1938). The logical foundations of the unity of science. In International Encyclopedia of Unified Science: Volume I (pp. 42–62). University of Chicago Press.

———. (1945a). On inductive logic. Philosophy of Science, 12, 72–97.

———. (1945b). The two concepts of probability. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5, 513–32.

———. (1947a). Meaning and Necessity. University of Chicago Press.

———. (1947b). Probability as a guide in life. Journal of Philosophy, 44, 141–48.

———. (1950a). Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4, 20–40. https://www.phil.cmu.edu/projects/carnap/editorial/latex_pdf/1956-ESO.pdf

———. (1950b). Logical Foundations of Probability. University of Chicago Press.

———. (1952). The Continuum of Inductive Methods. University of Chicago Press. https://www.phil.cmu.edu/projects/carnap/editorial/latex_pdf/1952-1.pdf

———. (1953). What is probability? Scientific American, 189, 128–139. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24944342

———. (1955). Meaning and synonymy in natural languages. Philosophical Studies, 6, 33–47.

———. (1958). Introduction to Symbolic Logic and its Applications. New York: Dover Publications.

———. (1959). The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis of language. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical Positivism (pp. 60–81). New York: The Free Press. (Translated by Arthur Pap; originally published in 1932 as “Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache“ in Erkenntnis, 2, 219–241.). https://philpapers.org/archive/TEO.pdf

———. (1960). Logical Foundations of Probability. University of Chicago Press.

———. (1966a). Philosophical Foundations of Physics. Basic Books.

———. (1966b). The aim of inductive logic. In Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics Vol. 44 (pp. 303–318). Elsevier.

———. (1973). Notes on probability and induction. Synthese, 25, 269–298.

———. (1983). The Logicist foundations of mathematics. In P. Benacerraf & H. Putnam (Eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings (pp. 41–52). Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1931 as "Die logizistische Grundlegung der Mathematik", Erkenntnis, 2, 91–121.).

———. (1987). On protocol sentences. Nous, 21, 457–470. (R. Creath & R. Nollan, Trans. Originally published in 1932 as Über Protokollsätze. Erkenntnis, 3, 215–228.). http://www.ualberta.ca/~francisp/NewPhil448/Carnap1932ProtocolSentences.pdf

———. (2003). The Logical Structure of the World. (R. A. George, Trans.). Chicago: Open Court. (Originally published in 1928 as Der logische Aufbau der Welt).

Carnap, R. & Schilpp, P. A. (1963). The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Open Court. http://fitelson.org/confirmation/carnap_schilpp_volume.pdf

Carney, J. (2020). Thinking avant la lettre: A Review of 4E Cognition. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 4, 77–90. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7250653/

Carroll, L. (1895). What the tortoise said to Achilles. Mind, 4, 278–280. http://www.ditext.com/carroll/tortoise.html

Carroll, S. M. (2004). Spacetime and Geometry. Addison Wesley.

———. (2019). Something Deeply Hidden. Dutton.

Carroll, S. M. & Singh, A. (2019). Mad-Dog Everettianism: Quantum mechanics at its most minimal. In What is Fundamental? (pp. 95–104). Springer. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.08132

Carter, N. (2009). Visual Group Theory. Mathematical Association of America.

Cartwright, N. (2001). What is wrong with Bayes nets? Monist, 84, 242–264. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist20018429

Carus, A. W. (2008). Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought. Cambridge University Press.

Casadei, D. (2012). Estimating the selection efficiency. Journal of Instrumentation, 7, 08021. https://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0130

Caucheteux, C. & King, J. R. (2020). Language processing in brains and deep neural networks: Computational convergence and its limit. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.03.186288

Caulton, A. (2014). Physical entanglement in permutation-invariant quantum mechanics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.0246

———. (2015). The role of symmetry in the interpretation of physical theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 52, 153–162. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/11571/

———. (2018). A persistent particle ontology for quantum field theory. Metascience, 27, 439–441. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11016-018-0323-1

Caulton, A. & Butterfield, J. (2012). Symmetries and paraparticles as a motivation for structuralism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63, 233–285. https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.3730

Cavell, S. (2015). Must We Mean What We Say? Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1969).

Caves, C. M., Fuchs, C. A., & Schack, R. (2001). Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities. Physical Review A, 65, 022305. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0106133

CDF Collaboration. (2022). High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CDF II detector. Science, 376, 170–176. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abk1781

Cesa-Bianchi, N. & Lugosi, G. (2006). Prediction, Learning, and Games. Cambridge University Press. https://ii.uni.wroc.pl/~lukstafi/pmwiki/uploads/AGT/Prediction_Learning_and_Games.pdf

Chakravartty, A. (2007). A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism. Cambridge University Press.

———. (2017). Scientific realism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-realism/

Chalmers, D. (2003). The Matrix as metaphysics. http://consc.net/papers/matrix.html

Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press.

———. (2020a). Carnap’s Second Aufbau and David Lewis’s Aufbau. In Franz Brentano and Austrian Philosophy (pp. 329–352). Springer. https://philpapers.org/archive/CHACSA-16.pdf

———. (2020b). What is conceptual engineering and what should it be? Inquiry, 0, 1–18. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1817141

Chalmers, M. (2017). Model physicist. https://cerncourier.com/a/model-physicist/

Chang, X., Li, Y., Oymak, S., & Thrampoulidis, C. (2020). Provable benefits of overparameterization in model compression: From double descent to pruning neural networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.08749

Chen, E. K. (2018). The intrinsic structure of quantum mechanics. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/15140/

Chen, R. T. Q., Rubanova, Y., Bettencourt, J., & Duvenaud, D. (2018). Neural ordinary differential equations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.07366

Chen, S., Dobriban, E., & Lee, J. H. (2020). A group-theoretic framework for data augmentation. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10905

Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. (2016). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.02754

Chen, X. et al. (2018). Open is not enough. Nature Physics, 15, 113–119. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-018-0342-2

Chester, D., Marrani, A., & Rios, M. (2023). Beyond the Standard Model with six-dimensional spinors. Particles, 6, 144-172. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02391

Chevalley, M., Schwab, P., & Mehrjou, A. (2024). Deriving causal order from single-variable interventions: Guarantees & algorithm. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18314

Chew, G. (1961). S-Matrix Theory of Strong Interactions. New York: Benjamin.

———. (1964). Nuclear democracy and bootstrapping dynamics. In M. Jacob & G. Chew (Eds.), Strong Interaction Physics: A Lecture Note Volume (pp. 103–152). New York: Benjamin.

Chiley, V. et al. (2019). Online normalization for training neural networks. NeurIPS 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.05894

Chisholm, R. (1966). Theory of Knowledge. Prentice Hall.

Chowdhery, A. et al. (2022). PaLM: Scaling language modeling with pathways. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.02311

Chu, J. S. & Evans, J. A. (2021). Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118, e2021636118. https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2021636118

Church, A. (1936). A note on the Entscheidungsproblem. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1, 40–41.

———. (1940). A formulation of the simple theory of types. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 5, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/2266170

Church, K. W. & Hestness, J. (2019). A survey of 25 years of evaluation. Natural Language Engineering, 25, 753–767. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/natural-language-engineering/article/survey-of-25-years-of-evaluation/E4330FAEB9202EC490218E3220DDA291

Churchland, P. S. (2011). What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality. Princeton University Press.

Ciepielewski, G. (2020). On superdeterministic rejections of settings independence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.00631

Cilibrasi, R. & Vitanyi, P. M. B. (2005). Clustering by compression. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 51, 1523–1545.

Ciresan, D., Meier, U., Masci, J., & Schmidhuber, J. (2012). Multi-column deep neural network for traffic sign classification. Neural Networks, 32, 333–338. https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.2745

Clark, M. (1963). Knowledge and grounds: A comment on Mr. Gettier’s paper. Analysis, 24, 46–48.

Clarke, K. A. & Primo, D. M. (2004). The theoretical implications of the empirical implications of theoretical models. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2004, Chicago.

Clauser, J., Horne, M., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. (1969). Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Physical Review Letters, 23, 880–884.

Clayton, A. (2021). Bernoulli’s Fallacy: Statistical Illogic and the Crisis of Modern Science. Columbia University Press.

Clifford, W. K. (1877). The ethics of belief. Contemporary Review, 29, 289. https://web.archive.org/web/20190427051422/https://www.uta.edu/philosophy/faculty/burgess-jackson/Clifford.pdf

Clopper, C. J. & Pearson, E. S. (1934). The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika, 26, 404–413.

Clowe, D. et al. (2006). A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 648, 109. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0608407

CMS Collaboration. (2012). Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC. Physics Letters B, 716, 30–61. https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7235

Coadou, Y. (2022). Boosted decision trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.09645

Coecke, B. & Kissinger, A. (2017). Picturing Quantum Processes: A first course in quantum theory and diagrammatic reasoning. Cambridge University Press.

Coffa, A. (1987). Carnap, Tarski and the search for truth. Noûs, 21, 547–572. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2215672

———. (1991). The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station. Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–9. https://www2.psych.ubc.ca/~schaller/528Readings/Cohen1992.pdf

Cohen, M. A., Dennett, D. C., & Kanwisher, N. (2016). What is the bandwidth of perceptual experience? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 324–335. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/112190/nihms769621.pdf

Cohen, M. L. (2015). Explaining and predicting the properties of materials using quantum theory. MRS Bulletin, 40, 516–525. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/mrs-bulletin/article/explaining-and-predicting-the-properties-of-materials-using-quantum-theory/0BAF1A2783D41470AAE666F6B916ECE5

Cohen, T. S., Weiler, M., Kicanaoglu, B., & Welling, M. (2019). Gauge equivariant convolutional networks and the icosahedral CNN. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.04615

Cohen, T. S. & Welling, M. (2016). Group equivariant convolutional networks. Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning, 2016, 2990–9. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v48/cohenc16.pdf

Coleman, S. (2020). Sidney Coleman’s Dirac Lecture "Quantum Mechanics in Your Face". https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.12671

Coleman, S. & Mandula, J. (1967). All possible symmetries of the S matrix. Physical Review, 159, 1251–1256.

Collobert, R., Hannun, A., & Synnaeve, G. (2019). A fully differentiable beam search decoder. International Conference on Machine Learning, 2019, 1341–1350. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/collobert19a/collobert19a.pdf

Comte, A. (1835). Cours de la Philosophie Positive.

Connes, A. (1985). Non-commutative differential geometry. Publications Mathématiques de L’Institut Des Hautes Scientifiques, 62, 41–144. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02698807

Contestabile, B. (2018). Secular Buddhism and Justice. Contemporary Buddhism, 19, 237–250.

Convivialist International. (2020). The second convivialist manifesto: Towards a post-neoliberal world. Civic Sociology, 1, 12721. https://online.ucpress.edu/cs/article/1/1/12721/112920/THE-SECOND-CONVIVIALIST-MANIFESTO-Towards-a-Post

Conway, J. & Kochen, S. (2006). The free will theorem. Foundations of Physics, 36, 1441–1473. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0604079

Cooper, J. M. & Hutchinson, D. S. (1997). Plato: Complete works. Hackett Publishing.

Costa, C. F. (2012). Philosophy as a protoscience. Disputatio, 4, 591–608. https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/disp-2012-0022

Cousins, R. D. (2018). Lectures on statistics in theory: Prelude to statistics in practice. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.05996

Cousins, R. D. & Highland, V. L. (1992). Incorporating systematic uncertainties into an upper limit. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A, 320, 331–335. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.193.1581&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Cowan, G. (1998). Statistical Data Analysis. Clarendon Press.

———. (2012). Discovery sensitivity for a counting experiment with background uncertainty. https://www.pp.rhul.ac.uk/~cowan/stat/notes/medsigNote.pdf

———. (2016). Statistics. In C. Patrignani et al. (Particle Data Group),. Chinese Physics C, 40, 100001. http://pdg.lbl.gov/2016/reviews/rpp2016-rev-statistics.pdf

Cowan, G., Cranmer, K., Gross, E., & Vitells, O. (2011). Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics. European Physical Journal C, 71, 1544. https://arxiv.org/abs/1007.1727

———. (2012). Asymptotic distribution for two-sided tests with lower and upper boundaries on the parameter of interest. https://arxiv.org/abs/1210.6948

Cowen, T. (2006). The epistemic problem does not refute consequentialism. Utilitas, 18, 383–399. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=38f49ce2a860ac03be8bded707760bbb1c9f0f6b

Cowen, T. & Tabarrok, A. (2013a). Modern Priniciples: Macroeconomics (2nd ed.). Worth Publishers.

———. (2013b). Modern Priniciples: Microeconomics (2nd ed.). Worth Publishers.

Cox, D. R. (2006). Principles of Statistical Inference. Cambridge University Press.

Cramer, J. G. (1986). The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 58, 647.

Cramér, H. (1946). A contribution to the theory of statistical estimation. Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift, 29, 85–94.

Cranmer, K. (2015). Practical statistics for the LHC. https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07622

Cranmer, K. et al. (2012). HistFactory: A tool for creating statistical models for use with RooFit and RooStats. Technical Report: CERN-OPEN-2012-016. http://inspirehep.net/record/1236448/

Cranmer, K., Brehmer, J., & Louppe, G. (2019). The frontier of simulation-based inference. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01429

Cranmer, K., Pavez, J., & Louppe, G. (2015). Approximating likelihood ratios with calibrated discriminative classifiers. https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.02169

Cranmer, K., Seljak, U., & Terao, K. (2021). Machine learning. In P. A. Z. et al. (Ed.), Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics. 2020, 083C01. (and 2021 update). https://pdg.lbl.gov/2021-rev/2021/reviews/contents_sports.html

Cranmer, M. et al. (2020). Discovering symbolic models from deep learning with inductive biases. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11287

Creath, R. (2012). Rudolf Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. Springer.

———. (2017a). Logical empiricism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logical-empiricism/

———. (2017b). The logical and the analytic. Synthese, 194, 79–96. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-015-0685-5

———. (2023). What was Carnap rejecting when he rejected metaphysics? In From Biological Practice to Scientific Metaphysics. University of Minnesota Press. https://manifold.umn.edu/read/from-biological-practice-to-scientific-metaphysics/section/0d271498-1f37-49d7-8bf5-3268cb77b4a0

Cubitt, T., Perez-Garcia, D., & Wolf, M. (2015). Undecidability of the spectral gap. Nature, 528, 207–211.

Cushman, F. (2013). Action, outcome, and value. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 273–292.

D’Agnolo, R. T. & Wulzer, A. (2019). Learning New Physics from a Machine. Physical Review D, 99, 015014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.02350

d’Espagnat, B. (1979). The quantum theory and reality. Scientific American, 241, 158–181. https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/assets/media/pdf/197911_0158.pdf

———. (1999). Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Westview Press.

Daitz, E. (1953). The picture theory of meaning. Mind, 62, 184–201. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2251383

Dang, H. & Bright, L. K. (2021). How to make sense of contradictory science papers. Nautilus. June 2, 2021. https://nautil.us/issue/100/outsiders/how-to-make-sense-of-contradictory-science-papers

Dao, T. et al. (2022). FlashAttention: Fast and memory-efficient exact attention with IO-awareness. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14135

Dao, T. & Gu, A. (2024). Transformers are SSMs: Generalized models and efficient algorithms through structured state space duality. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.21060

Dar, Y., Muthukumar, V., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2021). A farewell to the bias-variance tradeoff? An overview of the theory of overparameterized machine learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.02355

Das, S. & Dürr, D. (2019). Arrival time distributions of spin-1/2 particles. Scientific Reports, 9, 2242. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-38261-4

Davidson, D. (1982). Rational animals. Dialectica, 36, 317–327.

Davis, N. (2015). To Explain the World review. The Guardian. February 21, 2015. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/feb/22/to-explain-the-world-steven-weinberg-history-great-thinkers

Dawid, A. P. (2014). Discussion of "On the Birnbaum Argument for the Strong Likelihood Principle". Statistical Science, 29, 240–241. https://projecteuclid.org/journals/statistical-science/volume-29/issue-2/Discussion-of-On-the-Birnbaum-Argument-for-the-Strong-Likelihood/10.1214/14-STS470.full

de Carvalho, M., Page, G. L., & Barney, B. J. (2019). On the geometry of Bayesian inference. Bayesian Analysis, 14, 1013–1036. https://projecteuclid.org/journals/bayesian-analysis/volume-14/issue-4/On-the-Geometry-of-Bayesian-Inference/10.1214/18-BA1112.full

De Cruz, H. (2016). Numerical cognition and mathematical realism. Philosopher’s Imprint, 16, 1–13. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0016.016

de la Madrid, R. (2005). The role of the rigged Hilbert space in quantum mechanics. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0502053

de Queiroz, A., Lachieze-Rey, M., & Simon, S. (2014). Symmetry, physical theories and theory change. Frontiers of Fundamental Physics, 14, 210. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ffp..confE.210D/abstract

de Swart, H. (2018). Philosophical and Mathematical Logic. Springer.

de Waal, F. (1982). Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex among Apes. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Debono, I. & Smoot, G. F. (2016). General relativity and cosmology: Unsolved questions and future directions. Universe, 2, 23. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.09781

Degorre, J., Laplante, S., & Roland, J. (2005). Simulating quantum correlations as a distributed sampling problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0507120

Del Santo, F. & Krizek, G. K. (2023). Against the "nightmare of a mechanically determined universe": Why Bohm was never a Bohmian. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05611

Del Santo, F. & Schwarzhans, E. (2022). "Philosophysics" at the University of Vienna: The (Pre-)history of foundations of quantum physics in the Viennese cultural context. Physics in Perspective, 24, 125–153. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00016-022-00290-y

Deligne, P. (1999). Notes on spinors. In Quantum Fields and Strings: A Course for Mathematicians, Vol. 1 (pp. 99–136). American Mathematical Society. https://publications.ias.edu/sites/default/files/79_NotesOnSpinors.pdf

———. (2002). Catégories Tensorielles. Moscow Mathematical Journal, 2, 227–248. https://www.math.ias.edu/files/deligne/Tensorielles.pdf

Denby, B. (1988). Neural networks and cellular automata in experimental high energy physics. Computer Physics Communications, 49, 429–448. https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/20/013/20013339.pdf

———. (1993). The use of neural networks in high-energy physics. Neural Computation, 5, 505–549. https://lss.fnal.gov/archive/1992/pub/Pub-92-215-E.pdf

Dennett, D. C. (1991a). Consciousness Explained. Hachette Book Group.

———. (1991b). Real patterns. The Journal of Philosophy, 88, 27–51. https://web.ics.purdue.edu/~drkelly/DCDRealPatterns1991.pdf

———. (1995). Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. Simon & Schuster.

———. (2006a). Breaking the Spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. Penguin.

———. (2006b). Higher-order truths about chmess. Topoi, 25, 39–41.

———. (2012). The mystery of David Chalmers. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 19, 86–95. https://web.archive.org/web/20230226072833/https://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/dennett/papers/chalmers.pdf

———. (2016). Illusionism as the obvious default theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23, 65–72. https://web.archive.org/web/20210224112608/https://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/dennett/papers/illusionism.pdf

Descartes, R. (1982). Principles of Philosophy. (V. R. Miller & R. P. Miller, Trans.). Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Originally published in 1644 as Principia Philosophiæ).

———. (1996). Oeuvres de Descartes, 11 volumes. (C. Adam & P. Tannery, Eds.). Paris: Vrin. http://philosophyfaculty.ucsd.edu/faculty/ctolley/texts/descartes.html

———. (2008). Meditations on First Philosophy. (M. Moriarty, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1641).

Dettmers, T., Pagnoni, A., Holtzman, A., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2023). QLoRA: Efficient finetuning of quantized LLMs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14314

Deutsch, D. (1985). Quantum theory as a universal physical theory. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 24, 1–41.

Devlin, J., Chang, M., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805

Dewar, N. (2019). Sophistication about symmetries. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70, 485–521.

Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Co.

DeWitt, B. S. (1970). Quantum mechanics and reality. Physics Today, 23, 30–35. https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.3022331

DeWitt, B. S. & Graham, N. (1973). The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press.

Dhariwal, P. & Nichol, A. (2021). Diffusion models beat GANs on image synthesis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.05233

Diamond, J. & Bellwood, P. (2003). Farmers and their languages: the first expansions. Science, 300, 597–603. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/300/5619/597

Dicker, G. (1991). Hume’s fork revisited. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 8, 327–342.

Dieleman, S., Fauw, J. D., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016). Exploiting cyclic symmetry in convolutional neural networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.02660

Diener, E. (2019). Happiness: the science of subjective well-being. http://noba.to/qnw7g32t

Dietrich, E. (2011). There is no progress in philosophy. Essays in Philosophy, 12, 9. https://philarchive.org/rec/DIETIN

Dimopoulos, S. & Georgi, H. (1981). Softly broken supersymmetry and SU(5). Nuclear Physics B, 193, 150–162.

Dinan, E., Yaida, S., & Zhang, S. (2023). Effective theory of transformers at initialization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02034

Dine, M. & Kusenko, A. (2004). The origin of the matter-antimatter asymmetry. Reviews of Modern Physics, 76, 1–30. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0303065

Dirac, P. A. M. (1963). The evolution of the physicist’s picture of nature. Scientific American, 208, 45–53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24936146

Donadi, S. & Hossenfelder, S. (2022). A toy model for local and deterministic wave-function collapse. Physical Review A, 106, 022212. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01327

Doob, J. L. (1935). The limiting distributions of certain statistics. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 6, 160–169. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2957546

Dosovitskiy, A. et al. (2020). An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11929

Douven, I. (2011). Abduction. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abduction/

Doyle, A. C. (1890). The Sign of the Four.

Drake, S. (1957). Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo. New York: Doubleday and Co.

Dreyfus, H. L. (1965). Alchemy and artificial intelligence. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3244.html

———. (1972). What Computers Can’t Do. MIT Press.

Drossel, B. (2015). On the relation between the second law of thermodynamics and classical and quantum mechanics. In B. Falkenburg & M. Morrison (Eds.), Why More is Different: Philosophical issues in condensed matter physics and complex systems (pp. 41–54). Springer.

Duff, M. J., Okun, L. B., & Veneziano, G. (2001). Trialogue on the number of fundamental constants. https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0110060

Duncan, A. (2012). Conceptual Framework of Quantum Field Theory. Oxford University Press.

Dürr, D. et al. (2014). Can Bohmian mechanics be made relativistic? Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 470, 20130699. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspa.2013.0699

Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., & Zanghì, N. (2004). Bohmian mechanics and quantum field theory. Physical Review Letters, 93, 090402. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0303156

———. (2005). Bell-type quantum field theories. Journal of Physics A, 38, R1. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0407116

Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zanghì, N. (1995). Bohmian mechanics as the foundation of quantum mechanics. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9511016

———. (2013). Quantum Physics Without Quantum Philosophy. Springer.

Dürr, D. & Lazarovici, D. (2020). Understanding Quantum Mechanics: The World According to Modern Quantum Foundations. Springer.

Dutailly, J. C. (2014). Particles and Fields. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00933043

Dwyer, P. S. (1967). Some applications of matrix derivatives in multivariate analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 607–625. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1967.10482934

Dyson, F. J. (1949). The S matrix in quantum electrodynamics. Physical Review, 75, 1736.

———. (1952). Divergence of perturbation theory in quantum electrodynamics. Physical Review, 85, 631.

Earman, J. (2000). Hume’s Abject Failure: The argument against miracles. Oxford University Press.

Earman, J. & Fraser, D. (2006). Haag’s theorem and its implications for the foundations of quantum field theory. Erkenntnis, 64, 305–344.

Earnshaw, E. (2017). How I solved Hume’s problem and why nobody will believe me. Philosophy Now. https://philosophynow.org/issues/119/How_I_Solved_Humes_Problem_and_Why_Nobody_Will_Believe_Me

Ebbs, G. (2017). Carnap, Quine, and Putnam on Methods of Inquiry. Cambridge University Press.

Edelman, B. L., Goel, S., Kakade, S., & Zhang, C. (2021). Inductive biases and variable creation in self-attention mechanisms. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.10090

Edmonds, D. (2020). The Murder of Professor Schlick: The Rise and Fall of the Vienna Circle. Princeton University Press.

Edwards, A. W. F. (1974). The history of likelihood. International Statistical Review, 42, 9–15.

Eells, E. (1988). On the alleged impossibility of inductive probability. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39, 111–116. https://fitelson.org/probability/eells_pm.pdf

Efron, B. & Hastie, T. (2016). Computer Age Statistical Inference: Algorithms, evidence, and data science. Cambridge University Press.

Eilenberg, S. & MacLane, S. (1945). General theory of natural equivalences. . Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 58, 231–294. https://www.ams.org/journals/tran/1945-058-00/S0002-9947-1945-0013131-6/S0002-9947-1945-0013131-6.pdf

Eilenberger, W. (2020). Time of the Magicians: Wittgenstein, Benjamin, Cassirer, Heidegger, and the decade that reinvented philosophy. Penguin Press.

Einstein, A. (1905a). Ist die trägheit eines körpers von seinem energieinhalt abhängig? Annalen Der Physik, 323, 639–641. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/andp.19053231314

———. (1905b). Über die von der molekularkinetischen theorie der wärme geforderte bewegung von in ruhenden flüssigkeiten suspendierten teilchen. Annalen Der Physik, 322, 549–560. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/andp.19053220806

———. (1905c). Über einen die erzeugung und verwandlung des lichtes betreffenden heuristischen gesichtspunkt. Annalen Der Physik, 322, 132–148. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/andp.19053220607

———. (1905d). Zur elektrodynamik bewegter körper. Annalen Der Physik, 322, 891–921. (On the electrodynamics of moving bodies). https://www.physics.umd.edu/courses/Phys606/spring_2011/einstein_electrodynamics_of_moving_bodies.pdf

———. (1922). Geometry and Experience. London: Methuen & Co. Address given to the Prussian Academy of Sciences on January 27, 1921. http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Extras/Einstein_geometry.html

Einstein, A. & Grossmann, M. (1913). Entwurf einer verallgemeinerten relativitätstheorie und einer theorie der gravitation (Outline of a generalized theory of relativity and of a theory of gravitation). Zeitschrift für Mathematik Und Physik, 62, 225–261. http://www.icra.it/MG/doc/Einstein_Entwurf_1913.pdf

Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47, 777–780. https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777

Elhage, N. et al. (2022). Toy models of superposition. https://transformer-circuits.pub/2022/toy_model/index.html

Enderton, H. B. (2009). Second-order and higher-order logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/logic-higher-order/

Englert, F. & Brout, R. (1964). Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons. Physical Review Letters, 13, 321–323. https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.321

Epictetus. (2014). Discourses, Fragments, Handbook. (R. Hard, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Originally recorded by pupil Arrian of Nicomedia c. 108 CE).

Epstein, H. & Glaser, V. (1973). The role of locality in perturbation theory. Annales de l’institut Henri Poincaré: Section A, 19, 211. http://www.numdam.org/item/?id=AIHPA_1973__19_3_211_0

Esfeld, M., Lazarovici, D., Lam, V., & Hubert, M. (2017). The physics and metaphysics of primitive stuff. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 68, 133–161.

Evans, M. (2013). What does the proof of Birnbaum’s theorem prove? https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.5468

Everett, H. (1956). Theory of the Universal Wave Function. Princeton University. (Ph.D. thesis. Reprinted in Barrett & Byrne (2012).).

———. (1957). "Relative state" formulation of quantum mechanics. Reviews Modern Physics, 29, 454–462.

———. (2012). The Everett Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Collected Works 1955-1980 with Commentary. (J. A. Barrett & P. Byrne, Eds.). Princeton University Press.

Ewald, W. (2018). The emergence of first-order logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-firstorder-emergence/

Fang, Z. et al. (2022). Is out-of-distribution detection learnable? NeurIPS 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.14707

Fefferman, C., Mitter, S., & Narayanan, H. (2016). Testing the manifold hypothesis. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 29, 983–1049. https://www.ams.org/journals/jams/2016-29-04/S0894-0347-2016-00852-4/S0894-0347-2016-00852-4.pdf

Feigl, H. (1950). Existential hypotheses: Realistic versus phenomenalistic interpretations. Philosophy of Science, 17, 35–62.

———. (1956). Some major issues and developments in the philosophy of science of logical empiricism. In H. Feigl & M. Scriven (Eds.), The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis (pp. 3–37). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

———. (1958). Critique of intuition according to scientific empiricism. Philosophy East and West, 8, 1.

———. (1981). The origin and spirit of logical positivism. Inquiries and Provocations, 21.

Feldman, G. J. & Cousins, R. D. (1998). A unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals. Physical Review D, 57, 3873. https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9711021

Fetzer, J. (2017). Carl Hempel. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hempel

Feyerabend, P. (1974). Against Method. Verso.

Feynman, R. P. (1959). There’s plenty of room at the bottom. https://calteches.library.caltech.edu/1976/1/1960Bottom.pdf

———. (1963). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume I. California Institute of Technology. http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_03.html

———. (1965). The development of the space-time view of quantum electrodynamics. Nobel Lecture, December 11, 1965. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1965/feynman/lecture/

———. (1998). The Meaning of It All. Addison-Wesley.

———. (1999). The Pleasure of Finding Things Out. Basic Books.

Feynman, R. P. & Hibbs, A. R. (1965). Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals. Dover. Emended edition (2005).

Field, H. (1974). Theory change and the indeterminacy of reference. The Journal of Philosophy, 70, 462–481.

———. (1989). Realism, Mathematics, and Modality. Oxford: Blackwell.

———. (2016). Science Without Numbers (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1980 by Princeton University Press).

Fienberg, S. E. (2006). When did Bayesian inference become "Bayesian"? Bayesian Analysis, 1, 1–40. https://projecteuclid.org/journals/bayesian-analysis/volume-1/issue-1/When-did-Bayesian-inference-become-Bayesian/10.1214/06-BA101.full

Finzi, M. et al. (2025). Compute-optimal LLMs provably generalize better with scale. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15208

Firth, J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930-1955. In Studies in Linguistic Analysis (pp. 1–31). Oxford: Blackwell.

Fisher, R. A. (1912). On an absolute criterion for fitting frequency curves. Statistical Science, 12, 39–41.

———. (1915). Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples of indefinitely large population. Biometrika, 10, 507–521.

———. (1921). On the "probable error" of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metron, 1, 1–32.

———. (1935). The Design of Experiments. Hafner.

———. (1955). Statistical methods and scientific induction. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 17, 69–78.

Fleming, G. N. (2000). Reeh-Schlieder meets Newton-Wigner. Philosophy of Science, 67, S495–S515. https://www.jstor.org/stable/188690

Fodor, J. A. (1974). Special sciences (Or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese, 28, 97–115.

———. (1975). The Language of Thought. Harvard University Press.

Fodor, J. A. & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 3–71.

Fong, B. & Spivak, D. I. (2018). Seven sketches in compositionality: An invitation to applied category theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.05316

Fowler, S. (2010). LSL in a nutshell. https://philarchive.org/archive/FOWLIA

Frankel, T. (1997). The Geometry of Physics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.

———. (2004). The Geometry of Physics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Frankish, K. (2016). Illusionism as a theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23, 11–39. https://keithfrankish.github.io/articles/Frankish_Illusionism%20as%20a%20theory%20of%20consciousness_eprint.pdf

Frankle, J. & Carbin, M. (2018). The lottery ticket hypothesis: Finding sparse, trainable neural networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.03635

Franzén, T. (2005). Gödel’s Theorem: An incomplete guide to its use and abuse. A K Peters.

Fraser, C. (2020). Mohism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mohism/

Fraser, D. (2008). The fate of ’particles’ in quantum field theories with interactions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39, 841–859. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/4038/

———. (2011). How to take particle physics seriously: A further defence of axiomatic quantum field theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 42, 126–135.

Fraser, J. D. (2018). Renormalization and the formulation of scientific realism. Philosophy of Science, 85, 1164–1175. https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/14049/1/rgrealism_preprint.pdf

———. (2021). The twin origins of renormalization group concepts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 89, 114–128. https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/preview/1218769/34961.pdf

Frauchiger, D. & Renner, R. (2018). Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. Nature Communications.

Frè, P. G. (2013a). Gravity, a Geometrical Course, Volume 1: Development of the Theory and Basic Physical Applications. Springer.

———. (2013b). Gravity, a Geometrical Course, Volume 2: Black Holes, Cosmology and Introduction to Supergravity. Springer.

Fréchet, M. (1943). Sur l’extension de certaines évaluations statistiques au cas de petits échantillons. Revue de l’Institut International de Statistique, 11, 182–205.

Freed, D. S. (2001). Dirac charge quantization and generalized differential cohomology. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0011220

Freed, D. S. & Moore, G. W. (2012). Twisted equivariant matter. https://arxiv.org/abs/1208.5055

Freedman, D. Z., Nieuwenhuizen, P. van, & Ferrara, S. (1976). Progress toward a theory of supergravity. Physical Review D, 13, 3214–3218.

French, C. F. (2015). Philosophy as Conceptual Engineering: Inductive Logic in Rudolf Carnap’s Scientific Philosophy. (Ph.D. thesis). https://web.archive.org/web/20170810180750id_/https://philpapers.org/archive/FREPAC-7.pdf

French, S. (2007). Science: Key Concepts in Philosophy. London: Continuum.

Frenkel, E. (2005). Lectures on the Langlands program and conformal field theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0512172

Freund, Y. & Schapire, R. E. (1997). A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55, 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1997.1504

Friedman, M. (1999). Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge University Press.

———. (2000). A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger. Open Court Publishing.

———. (2002). Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger: The Davos disputation and twentieth century philosophy. European Journal of Philosophy, 10, 263–274.

Friedman, M. & Creath, R. (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Carnap. Cambridge University Press.

Friedrich, B. (2016). How did the tree of knowledge get its blossom? The rise of physical and theoretical chemistry, with an eye on Berlin and Leipzig. Angewandte, 55, 5378–5392. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.201509260

Frigg, R. & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in science. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/models-science/

Frigg, R. & Nguyen, J. (2017). Models and representation. In Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science (pp. 49–102). Springer.

Frigg, R. & Votsis, I. (2011). Everything you always wanted to know about structural realism but were afraid to ask. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1, 227–276.

Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 11, 127–138. https://www.uab.edu/medicine/cinl/images/KFriston_FreeEnergy_BrainTheory.pdf

Fronsdal, G. (2001). The Issue at Hand: Essays on Buddhist Mindfulness Practice (4th ed.). https://www.insightmeditationcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/documents/iah/IssueAtHand4thEd.pdf

Frost-Arnold, G. (2013). Carnap, Tarski, and Quine at Harvard: Conversations on Logic, Mathematics, and Science. Open Court.

Fuchs, C. A. (2002). Quantum mechanics as quantum information (and only a little more). https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0205039

———. (2010). QBism, the perimeter of quantum Bayesianism. https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.5209

Fuchs, C. A., Mermin, N. D., & Schack, R. (2014). An introduction to QBism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 82, 749–754. https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.5253

Fuchs, C. A. & Schack, R. (2013). Quantum-Bayesian coherence: The no-nonsense version. Reviews of Modern Physics, 85, 1693–1715. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3274

Fuchs, C. A. & Stacey, B. C. (2016). QBism: Quantum theory as a hero’s handbook. https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.07308

Fuchs, F. B., Worrall, D. E., Fischer, V., & Welling, M. (2020). SE(3)-Transformers: 3D roto-translation equivariant attention networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.10503

Fukushima, K. & Miyake, S. (1982). Neocognitron: A new algorithm for pattern recognition tolerant of deformations and shifts in position. Pattern Recognition, 15, 455–469.

Gabriel, G. (2003). Carnap’s "Elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis of language". In Logical Empiricism: Historical and contemporary perspectives (pp. 30–42). University of Pittsburgh Press.

Gabriel, I. et al. (2024). The ethics of advanced AI assistants. https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/DeepMind.com/Blog/ethics-of-advanced-ai-assistants/the-ethics-of-advanced-ai-assistants-2024-i.pdf

Gamba, M., Englesson, E., Björkman, M., & Azizpour, H. (2022). Deep double descent via smooth interpolation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.10080

Gammerman, A., Vovk, V., & Vapnik, V. (1998). Learning by transduction. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 14, 148–155. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.7375

Gandenberger, G. (2015). A new proof of the likelihood principle. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66, 475–503. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1093/bjps/axt039

———. (2016). Why I am not a likelihoodist. Philosopher’s Imprint, 16, 1–22. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/phimp/3521354.0016.007/--why-i-am-not-a-likelihoodist

Gao, Y. & Chaudhari, P. (2020). An information-geometric distance on the space of tasks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.00613

Gardner, M. W. & Dorling, S. R. (1998). Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)–a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences. Atmospheric Environment, 32, 2627–2636.

Garfield, J. L. & Van Norden, B. W. (2016). If philosophy won’t diversify, let’s call it what it really is. New York Times Opinion. May 11, 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/11/opinion/if-philosophy-wont-diversify-lets-call-it-what-it-really-is.html

Gaskin, R. (2009). Realism and the picture theory of meaning. Philosophical Topics, 37, 49–62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43154543

Geanakoplos, J. D. & Polemarchakis, H. M. (1982). We can’t disagree forever. Journal of Economic Theory, 28, 192–200.

Gefter, A. & Hoffman, D. D. (2016). The case against reality. The Atlantic. April 25, 2016. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/04/the-illusion-of-reality/479559/

Geiko, R. & Moore, G. W. (2020). Dyson’s classification and real division superalgebras. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01675

Gell-Mann, M. (1988). Simplicity and complexity in the description of nature. Engineering and Science, 51, 2–9. https://calteches.library.caltech.edu/53/2/Mann.pdf

Gell-Mann, M. & Hartle, J. B. (1989). Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology. In Proceedings of the Santa Fe Institute Workshop on Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information. Addison-Wesley. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04605

Gell-Mann, M. & Low, F. (1951). Bound states in quantum field theory. Physical Review, 84, 350–354.

Gelman, A. & Hennig, C. (2017). Beyond subjective and objective in statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 180, 967–1033.

Gelman, A. & Vehtari, A. (2021). What are the most important statistical ideas of the past 50 years? Journal of the American Statistical Association, 116, 2087–2097. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01621459.2021.1938081

Georgi, H. (1999). Lie Algebras in Particle Physics (2nd ed.). Westview Press. (Originally published in 1982).

Georgi, H. & Glashow, S. L. (1974). Unity of all elementary-particle forces. Physical Review Letters, 32, 438–441. http://pcbat1.mi.infn.it/~battist/astrop/su5.pdf

Georgi, H., Quinn, H. R., & Weinberg, S. (1974). Hierarchy of interactions in unified gauge theories. Physical Review Letters, 33, 451.

Geshkovski, B., Letrouit, C., Polyanskiy, Y., & Rigollet, P. (2023). A mathematical perspective on Transformers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10794

Gettier, E. L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23, 121–3.

Ghirardi, G. C., Pearle, P., & Rimini, A. (1990). Markov processes in Hilbert space and continuous spontaneous localization of systems of identical particles. Physical Review A, 42, 78–89.

Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., & Weber, T. and. (1986). Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. Physical Review D, 34, 470–491.

Ghosh, N. & Belkin, M. (2022). A universal trade-off between the model size, test loss, and training loss of linear predictors. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.11621

Gibson, R. (2014). Regret minimization in games and the development of champion multiplayer computer poker-playing agents. University of Alberta. (Ph.D. thesis). https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/15d28cbf-49d4-42e5-a9c9-fc55b1d816af/view/5ee708c7-6b8b-4b96-b1f5-23cdd95b6a46/Gibson_Richard_Spring-202014.pdf

Gill, T. L. (2017). The Feynman-Dyson view. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 845, 012023. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/845/1/012023/pdf

Girard, J. Y. (1987). Linear logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 50, 1–102. http://girard.perso.math.cnrs.fr/linear.pdf

Gisin, N. (1991). Bell’s inequality holds for all non-product states. Physics Letters A, 154, 201–202.

———. (1999). Bell inequality for arbitrary many settings of the analyzers. Physics Letters A, 260, 1–3. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9905062

———. (2020). Indeterminism in physics and intuitionistic mathematics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.02348

Gisin, N. & Del Santo, F. (2023). Towards a measurement theory in QFT: "Impossible" quantum measurements are possible but not ideal. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.13644

Gisin, N. & Peres, A. (1992). Maximal violation of Bell’s inequality for arbitrarily large spin. Physics Letters A, 162, 15–17.

Glashow, S. (1961). Partial symmetries of weak interactions. Nuclear Physics, 22, 579–588.

Glick, D. (2016). The ontology of quantum field theory: Structural realism vindicated? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 59, 78–86. https://philarchive.org/archive/GLITOO

Gödel, K. (1929). Über die Vollständigkeit des Logikkalküls. University Of Vienna. (Doctoral dissertation. The first proof of the completeness theorem.).

———. (1931). Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme, I. Monatshefte für Mathematik Und Physik, 38, 173–198.

———. (1995). Some basic theorems on the foundations of mathematics and their implications. In S. Feferman (Ed.), Kurt Gödel Collected Works, Vol. III. (304–323). Oxford University Press.

Goldenfeld, N. (1992). Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group. Perseus Books.

Goldfarb, W. (2005). On Gödel’s way in: The influence of Rudolf Carnap. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 11, 185–193. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1556748

Goldman, A. H. (1993). Realism about aesthetic properties. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 51, 31–37.

Goldreich, O. & Ron, D. (1997). On universal learning algorithms. Information Processing Letters, 63, 131–136. https://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~oded/p_ul.html

Goldstein, R. (2005). Incompleteness: The Proof and Paradox of Kurt Gödel. Norton.

Golovneva, O., Wang, T., Weston, J., & Sukhbaatar, S. (2024). Contextual position encoding: Learning to count what’s important. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18719

Good, I. J. (1965). Speculations concerning the first ultraintelligent machine. Advances in Computers, 6, 31–88. https://blog.biocomm.ai/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/IJ-Good.-Speculations-Concerning-the-First-Ultraintelligent-Machine.pdf

———. (1988). The interface between statistics and philosophy of science. Statistical Science, 3, 386–397.

Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press. http://www.deeplearningbook.org

Goodman, N. & Quine, W. V. O. (1947). Steps toward a constructive nominalism. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12, 105–122.

Goodman, S. N. (1999a). Toward evidence-based medical statistics 1: The P value fallacy. Annals of Internal Medicine, 130, 995–1004. https://courses.botany.wisc.edu/botany_940/06EvidEvol/papers/goodman1.pdf

———. (1999b). Toward evidence-based medical statistics 2: The Bayes factor. Annals of Internal Medicine, 130, 1005–1013. https://courses.botany.wisc.edu/botany_940/06EvidEvol/papers/goodman2.pdf

Gopakumar, R. (2011). What is the simplest gauge-string duality? https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.2386

Gopakumar, R. & Mazenc, E. A. (2022). Deriving the simplest gauge-string duality, I: Open-closed-open triality. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.05999

Gorard, S. & Gorard, J. (2016). What to do instead of significance testing? Calculating the ’number of counterfactual cases needed to disturb a finding’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19, 481–490.

Gould, S. J. (1965). Is uniformitarianism necessary? American Journal of Science, 263, 223–228.

Goyal, P. (2020). Derivation of classical mechanics in an energetic framework via conservation and relativity. Foundations of Physics, 50, 1426–1479.

Graves, A. (2013). Generating sequences with recurrent neural networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.0850

Greaves, H. & Thomas, T. (2012). The CPT theorem. https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.4674

Greaves, H. & Wallace, D. (2011). Empirical consequences of symmetries. https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.4309

Greenberger, D., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Zeilinger, A. (1990). Bell’s theorem without inequalities. American Journal of Physics, 58, 1131.

Greenberger, D., Horne, M. A., & Zeilinger, A. (1989). Going beyond Bell’s theorem. https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.0921

Greenblatt, S. (2011a). The answer man: An ancient poem was rediscovered—and the world swerved. The New Yorker. August 1, 2011. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/08/08/the-answer-man-stephen-greenblatt

———. (2011b). The Swerve: How the World Became Modern. Norton.

Grice, H. P. & Strawson, P. F. (1956). In defense of a dogma. The Philosophical Review, 65, 141–158.

Grinsztajn, L., Oyallon, E., & Varoquaux, G. (2022). Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data? https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.08815

Gross, D. J. (1996). The role of symmetry in fundamental physics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 14256–14259. https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.93.25.14256

Gross, P. (1994). Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels With Science. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Grzankowski, A. (2015). Not all attitudes are propositional. European Journal of Philosophy, 23, 374–391.

Gu, A. & Dao, T. (2023). Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00752

Gu, A., Goel, K., & Ré, C. (2021). Efficiently modeling long sequences with structured state spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.00396

Guralnik, G. S., Hagen, C. R., & Kibble, T. W. B. (1964). Global conservation laws and massless particles. Physical Review Letters, 13, 585–587. https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.585

Gurnee, W. et al. (2023). Finding neurons in a haystack: Case studies with sparse probing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01610

Gurnee, W. & Tegmark, M. (2023). Language models represent space and time. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02207

Guth, A. H. (1981). Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems. Physical Review D, 23, 347–356. https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347

———. (1997). Was cosmic inflation the ’bang’ of the big bang? The Beamline, 27, 14. https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Guth/Guth_contents.html

———. (2007). Eternal inflation and its implications. Journal of Physics A, 40, 6811. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0702178

Guyer, P. & Horstmann, R. P. (2021). Idealism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/idealism/

———. (2023). Idealism in Modern Philosophy. *Oxford University Press*.

Haack, S. (1996). We Pragmaticists: Peirce and Rorty in conversation. Agora: Papeles de Filosofía, 15, 53–68. https://minerva.usc.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10347/1078/pg_057-072_agora15-1.pdf

———. (1997). Vulgar Rortyism. The New Criterion. https://web.archive.org/web/20081211042858/http://www.newcriterion.com/articlepdf.cfm/rortyism-haack-3261

Haag, R. (1955). On quantum field theories. Matematisk-Fysiske Meddelelser, 29, 1–37. http://cds.cern.ch/record/212242

———. (1992). Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras. Springer.

Haag, R., Łopuszański, J. T., & Sohnius, M. (1975). All possible generators of supersymmetries of the S-matrix. Nuclear Physics B, 88, 257–274.

Habara, K., Fukuda, E. H., & Yamashita, N. (2023). Convergence analysis and acceleration of the smoothing methods for solving extensive-form games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11046

Haber, E. et al. (2018). Learning across scales: Multiscale methods for convolution neural networks. AAAI Proceedings, 32, 3142–3148. https://cdn.aaai.org/ojs/11680/11680-13-15208-1-2-20201228.pdf

Haber, E. & Ruthotto, L. (2017). Stable architectures for deep neural networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.03341

Hacking, I. (1965). Logic of Statistical Inference. Cambridge University Press.

———. (1971). Jacques Bernoulli’s Art of conjecturing. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 22, 209–229.

———. (2001). An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. Cambridge University Press.

Hahn, H., Neurath, O., & Carnap, R. (1973). The scientific conception of the world: The Vienna Circle. In M. Neurath & R. S. Cohen (Eds.), Empiricism and Sociology (pp. 298–318). Dordrecht: Reidel. (Originally published in German in 1929 as “Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis“). http://rreece.github.io/philosophy-reading-list/docs/the-scientific-conception-of-the-world-the-vienna-circle.pdf

Hall, B. C. (2000). An Elementary Introduction to Groups and Representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0005032

Hall, M. J. W. (2010). Local deterministic model of singlet state correlations based on relaxing measurement independence. Physical Review Letters, 105, 250404. https://arxiv.org/abs/1007.5518

Halverson, J., Maiti, A., & Stoner, K. (2020). Neural networks and quantum field theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.08601

Halvorson, H. (2019). To be a realist about quantum theory. In O. Lombardi (Ed.), Quantum Worlds: Perspectives on the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics. https://philpapers.org/archive/HALSPO-6.pdf

Hamamatsu. (2007). Photomultiplier Tubes: Basics and Applications (3rd ed.). Hamamatsu Photonics. https://www.hamamatsu.com/content/dam/hamamatsu-photonics/sites/documents/99_SALES_LIBRARY/etd/PMT_handbook_v3aE.pdf

Hamming, R. W. (1980). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics. The American Mathematical Monthly, 87, 81–90.

Hanley, J. A. & Lippman-Hand, A. (1983). If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right?: Interpreting zero numerators. JAMA, 249, 1743–1745.

Hanson, R., Martin, D., McCarter, C., & Paulson, J. (2021). If loud aliens explain human earliness, quiet aliens are also rare. The Astrophysical Journal, 922, 182. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ac2369

Hansson, S. O. & Hendricks, V. F. (2018). Introduction to Formal Philosophy. Springer.

Harding, S. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Cornell University Press.

Harrigan, N. & Spekkens, R. W. (2010). Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states. Foundations of Physics, 40, 125–157. https://arxiv.org/abs/0706.2661

Harris, S. (2010). The Moral Landscape: How science can determine human values. Free Press.

———. (2014). Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion. Simon & Schuster.

Hart, S. & Mas‐Colell, A. (2000). A simple adaptive procedure leading to correlated equilibrium. Econometrica, 68, 1127–1150. https://www.ma.imperial.ac.uk/~dturaev/Hart0.pdf

Hartigan, J. A. (1985). Statistical theory in clustering. Journal of Classification, 2, 63–76. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01908064

Harvey, P. (2013). An Introduction to Buddhism (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Haslanger, S. (2000). Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be? Nous, 34, 31–55. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/0029-4624.00201

———. (2012). Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique. Oxford University Press.

Hastie, T., Montanari, A., Rosset, S., & Tibshirani, R. J. (2022). Surprises in high-dimensional ridgeless least squares interpolation. Annals of Statistics, 50, 949. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9481183/

Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (2nd ed.). Springer.

Hayek, F. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.

Hayes, R. P. (1988). Principled atheism in the Buddhist scholastic tradition. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 16, 5–28. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00235404

He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015). Deep residual learning for image recognition. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03385

Healey, R. (2007). Gauging What’s Real. Oxford University Press.

Heaviside, O. (1893). Electromagnetic Theory, Vol. 1. London: The Electrician.

Heer, J. (2017). America’s first postmodern president. New Republic. July 8, 2017. https://newrepublic.com/article/143730/americas-first-postmodern-president

Heesen, R. (2017). Communism and the incentive to share in science. Philosophy of Science, 84, 698–716.

Heidegger, M. (1929). What is metaphysics? Lecture at the U. of Freiburg. https://antilogicalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/what-is-metaphysics.pdf

———. (1966). Discourse on Thinking. (J. M. Anderson & E. H. Freund, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row. (Originally published in 1959 as Gelassenheit).

Heilbron, J. L. (2013). The first Solvay council: "A sort of private conference". In D. Gross, M. Henneaux, & A. Servin (Eds.), The Theory of the Quantum World: Proceedings of the 25th Solvay Conference on Physics (pp. 1–16). World Scientific.

Heinrich, J. & Lyons, L. (2007). Systematic errors. Annual Reviews of Nuclear and Particle Science, 57, 145–169. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.nucl.57.090506.123052

Heinrich, J. & Silver, D. (2016). Deep reinforcement learning from self-play in imperfect-information games. https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01121

Hempel, C. G. (1950). Problems and changes in the empiricist criterion of meaning. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4, 41–63.

———. (1974). Formulation and formalization of scientific theories. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories. University of Illinois Press.

Hempel, C. G. & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135–175.

Hendricks, V. F. (2006). Mainstream and Formal Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.

Henighan, T. et al. (2023). Superposition, memorization, and double descent. https://transformer-circuits.pub/2023/toy-double-descent/index.html

Henkin, L. (1950). Completeness in the theory of types. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 15, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/2266967

———. (1953). Some notes on nominalism. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 18, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/2266323

———. (1996). The discovery of my completeness proofs. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 2, 127–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/421107

Hennig, C. (2010). Mathematical models and reality: A constructivist perspective. Foundations of Science, 15, 29–48.

———. (2015). What are the true clusters? Pattern Recognition Letters, 64, 53–62. https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.02555

Hestness, J. et al. (2017). Deep learning scaling is predictable, empirically. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.00409

Hicks, S. (2011). Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and socialism from Rousseau to Foucault. Ockham’s Razor Publishing. (Originally published in 2004).

Higgs, P. W. (1964). Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields. Physics Letters, 13, 508–509. https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508

Hilbert, D. (1926). Über das Unendliche. Mathematische Annalen, 95, 161–190. English translation, On the infinite, in van Heijenoort, J. (1967). From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1897-1931, pp. 183–201. Harvard University Press. https://lawrencecpaulson.github.io/papers/on-the-infinite.pdf

———. (1967). The foundations of mathematics. In J. van Heijenoort (Ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931 (pp. 464–479). Harvard University Press. (From a lecture given by Hilbert in 1927).

Hintikka, J. (1975). Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

———. (1999). Inquiry as Inquiry: A logic of scientific discovery. Springer.

Hirschman, D. (2016). Stylized facts in the social sciences. Sociological Science, 3, 604–626. https://sociologicalscience.com/download/vol-3/july/SocSci_v3_604to626.pdf

Hitchens, C. (2007). God is Not Great: How religion poisons everything. Hachette Book Group.

———. (2012). Mortality. Hachette Book Group.

Hobson, J. M. (2004). The Eastern Origins of Western Civlisation. Cambridge University Press.

Hochreiter, S. & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9, 1735–1780.

Hodges, W. (1985). Truth in a structure. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 86, 135–151. Wiley. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4545041.

———. (1997). A Shorter Model Theory. Cambridge University Press.

Hoffmann, J. et al. (2022). Training compute-optimal large language models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.15556

Holm, D. D. (2011a). Geometric Mechanics - Part I: Dynamics And Symmetry (2nd ed.). Imperial College Press.

———. (2011b). Geometric Mechanics - Part II: Rotating, Translating, and Rolling (2nd ed.). Imperial College Press.

Holzmüller, D. (2020). On the universality of the double descent peak in ridgeless regression. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01851

Horacek, M. (2022). Risk-Aversion in Algorithms for Poker. https://is.muni.cz/th/ydbvx/thesis.pdf

Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989). Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 2, 359–366. https://cognitivemedium.com/magic_paper/assets/Hornik.pdf

Hossenfelder, S. (2023). Quantum confusions, cleared up (or so I hope). https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12299

Hossenfelder, S. & Palmer, T. (2020). Rethinking superdeterminism. Frontiers in Physics, 8, 139. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.00139/full

Houghton, T. (2011). Does positivism really ’work’ in the social sciences? https://www.e-ir.info/2011/09/26/does-positivism-really-%E2%80%98work%E2%80%99-in-the-social-sciences/

Howard, A.G. et al. (2017). MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04861

Howard, J. N., Mandt, S., Whiteson, D., & Yang, Y. (2021). Foundations of a fast, data-driven, machine-learned simulator. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08944

Hu, E.J. et al. (2021). LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09685

Huang, L. et al. (2020). Normalization techniques in training DNNs: Methodology, analysis and application. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.12836

Huber, F. (2007). Confirmation and induction. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/conf-ind/

Hudson, H. (2016). Non-naturalistic metaphysics. In K. J. Clark (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism (pp. 168–181). Wiley.

Huggett, N. & Weingard, R. (1995). The renormalisation group and effective field theories. Synthese, 102, 171–194.

Huh, M. et al. (2024). Training neural networks from scratch with parallel low-rank adapters. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16828

Huh, M., Cheung, B., Wang, T., & Isola, P. (2024). The platonic representation hypothesis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.07987

Hume, D. (2007a). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. (P. Millican, Ed.). Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1748).

———. (2007b). The Natural History of Religion. (T. Beauchamp, Ed.). Clarendon Press. (Originally published in 1757).

———. (2009). A Treatise of Human Nature. Floating Press. (Originally published in 1740).

Hunter, G. (1971). Metalogic: An Introduction to the Metatheory of Standard First-Order Logic. University of California Press.

Hutchins, J. (2000). Yehoshua Bar-Hillel: A philosophers’ contribution to machine translation.

Hutter, M. (2007). Universal Algorithmic Intelligence: A mathematical top-down approach. In Artificial General Intelligence (pp. 227–290). Springer. http://www.hutter1.net/ai/aixigentle.htm

Huxley, A. (1945). The Perennial Philosophy. Harper & Brothers.

Ichikawa, J. & Jenkins, C. (2017). On putting knowledge ’first’. In J. A. Carter (Ed.), Knowledge First: Approaches in epistemology and mind (pp. 113–130). Oxford University Press.

Ingrosso, A. & Goldt, S. (2022). Data-driven emergence of convolutional structure in neural networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.00565

Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2, 696–701.

Isaac, M. G. & Koch, S. (2022). Foundational issues in conceptual engineering: Introduction and overview. Inquiry, 0, 1–9. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2028230

Ismael, J. (2023). Reflections on the asymmetry of causation. Interface Focus, 13, 20220081. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsfs.2022.0081

Ismael, J. & Schaffer, J. (2020). Quantum holism: Nonseparability as common ground. Synthese, 197, 4131–4160. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-016-1201-2

Ismailov, V. (2020). A three layer neural network can represent any multivariate function. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.03016

Jacobs, J. (2002). Naturalism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/naturali/

Jaeger, G. (2019). Are virtual particles less real? Entropy, 21, 141. https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/2/141

Jamali, M. et al. (2024). Semantic encoding during language comprehension at single-cell resolution. Nature, 631, 610–616. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07643-2

James, F. (2006). Statistical Methods in Experimental Particle Physics (2nd ed.). World Scientific.

James, F. & Roos, M. (1975). MINUIT: A system for function minimization and analysis of the parameter errors and corrections. Computational Physics Communications, 10, 343–367. https://cds.cern.ch/record/310399

James, W. & Stein, C. (1961). Estimation with quadratic loss. In Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 1 (pp. 361–379). University of California Press. https://projecteuclid.org/accountAjax/Download?urlId=bsmsp%2F1200512173&downloadType=presschapter&isResultClick=True

Janaway, C. (1999). Schopenhauer’s pessimism. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 44, 47–63.

Janyska, J., Modugno, M., & Vitolo, R. (2007). Semi-vector spaces and units of measurement. https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.1313

Javed, K. & Sutton, R. S. (2024). The big world hypothesis and its ramifications for artificial intelligence. http://incompleteideas.net/papers/The_Big_World_Hypothesis.pdf

Jaynes, E. T. (2003). Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. https://bayes.wustl.edu/etj/prob/book.pdf

Jenkins, C. (2014). Naturalism and norms of inference. In A. Fairweather & O. Flanagan (Eds.), Naturalizing Epistemic Virtue (pp. 53–69). Cambridge University Press.

———. (2016). Epistemological naturalisms. In K. Clark (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

Jerzak, E. (2009). Second-order logic, or: How I learned to stop worrying and love the incompleteness theorems. http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~may/VIGRE/VIGRE2009/REUPapers/Jerzak.pdf

Jevons, W. S. (1873a). The philosophy of inductive inference. Fortnightly Review, 14, 457–476. London: Chapman and Hall.

———. (1873b). The use of hypothesis. Fortnightly Review, 14, 778–788. London: Chapman and Hall.

Jiao, L. et al. (2024). AI meets physics: A comprehensive survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57, 256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10874-4

Johanson, M. (2013). Measuring the size of large no-limit poker games. https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.7008

———. (2016). Robust Strategies and Counter-Strategies: From Superhuman to Optimal Play. University of Alberta. (Ph.D. thesis). http://johanson.ca/publications/theses/2016-johanson-phd-thesis/2016-johanson-phd-thesis.pdf

Johanson, M. et al. (2012). Efficient Nash equilibrium approximation through Monte Carlo counterfactual regret minimization. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2012), 2, 837–846. https://www.idi.ntnu.no/emner/it3105/materials/poker/monte-carlo-cfm-2012.pdf

Johanson, M., Waugh, K., Bowling, M., & Zinkevich, M. (2011). Accelerating best response calculation in large extensive games. IJCAI 2011, Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 11, 258–265. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~kwaugh/publications/johanson11.pdf

Jones, W. (2013). The Works of Sir William Jones. (L. Teignmouta, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Joos, E. et al. (2003). Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory (2nd ed.). Springer. (Originally published in 1996).

Joos, E. & Zeh, H. D. (1985). The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment. Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter, 59, 223–243. http://www.decoherence.de/J+Z.pdf

Jordan, P., Neumann, J. von, & Wigner, E. P. (1934). On an algebraic generalization of the quantum mechanical formalism. Annals of Mathematics, 35, 29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1968117

Joyce, R. (2016). Evolution and moral naturalism. In The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism (pp. 369–385). John Wiley & Sons. http://personal.victoria.ac.nz/richard_joyce/acrobat/joyce_2016_evolution.and.moral.naturalism.pdf

Joyce, T. & Herrmann, J. M. (2017). A review of no free lunch theorems, and their implications for metaheuristic optimisation. In X. S. Yang (Ed.), Nature-Inspired Algorithms and Applied Optimization (pp. 27–52).

Juhl, C. & Loomis, E. (2009). Analyticity. Routledge.

Junk, T. (1999). Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A, 434, 435–443. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/9902006

Jurafsky, D. & Martin, J. H. (2022). Speech and Language Processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition (3rd ed.). https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/ed3book_jan122022.pdf

Kadanoff, L. P. (2013). Theories of matter: Infinities and renormalization. In R. Batterman (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics (pp. 109–141). Oxford University Press. https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.2985

Kadison, R. V. (1965). Transformations of states in operator theory and dynamics. Topology, 3, 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-9383(65)90075-3

Kagan, S. (2012). Death. Yale University Press.

Kaldor, N. (1961). Capital accumulation and economic growth. In Lutz & Hague (Eds.), The Theory of Capital (pp. 177–222). London. http://gesd.free.fr/kaldor61.pdf

Kalupahana, D. J. (1992). A History of Buddhist Philosophy: Continuities and Discontinuities. University of Hawaii Press.

Kant, I. (1912). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. (P. Carus, Trans.). Chicago: Open Court. (Originally published in 1783 as Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik).

———. (1996). Critique of Pure Reason. (W. Pluhar, Trans.). Hackett. (Originally published in 1787).

Kaplan, J. et al. (2019). Notes on contemporary machine learning for physicists. https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/jared-kaplan/files/2019/04/ContemporaryMLforPhysicists.pdf

———. (2020). Scaling laws for neural language models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361

Kardum, M. (2020). Rudolf Carnap–The grandfather of artificial neural networks: The influence of Carnap’s philosophy on Walter Pitts. In S. Skansi (Ed.), Guide To Deep Learning Basics: Logical, Historical And Philosophical Perspectives (pp. 55–66). Springer.

Karniadakis, G.E. et al. (2021). Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3, 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5

Kasprzak, W., Lysik, B., & Rybaczuk, M. (1990). Dimensional Analysis in the Identification of Mathematical Models. World Scientific.

Kastler, D. (2003). Rudolf Haag—Eighty Years. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 237, 3–6.

Katz, V. & Egenes, T. (2015). The Upanishads: A New Translation. Penguin.

Katzir, R. (2023). Why large language models are poor theories of human linguistic cognition: A reply to Piantadosi. https://lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/007190

Kaufmann, W. A. (2015). The Faith of a Heretic. Princeton University Press. (Originally published in 1961).

Kazemier, B. H. & Vuysje, D. (1962). Logic and Language: Studies Dedicated to Professor Rudolf Carnap on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday. Springer.

Keller, K. J., Papadopoulos, M. A., & Reyes-Lega, A. F. (2007). On the realization of symmetries in quantum mechanics. https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.0997

Kellogg, C. (2009). An American reader: Bill Clinton,. Los Angeles Times. https://latimesblogs.latimes.com/jacketcopy/2009/07/america-reads-bill-clinton.html

Kelvin, L. (1901). Nineteenth century clouds over the dynamical theory of heat and light. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 2, 1–40. https://www.equipes.lps.u-psud.fr/Montambaux/histoire-physique/Kelvin-1900.pdf

Keoke, E. D. & Porterfield, K. M. (2002). Encyclopedia of American Indian Contributions to the World. Checkmark Books. https://mexikaresistance.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/american-indian-contributions-to-the-world.pdf

Keynes, J. M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan and Co.

Keyt, D. (1964). Wittgenstein’s picture theory of language. The Philosophical Review, 73, 493–511. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2183303

Khanna, P. (2018). Positivism and realism. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer.

Khlentzos, D. (2011). Challenges to metaphysical realism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/realism-sem-challenge/

Kiani, B., Balestriero, R., Lecun, Y., & Lloyd, S. (2022). projUNN: efficient method for training deep networks with unitary matrices. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.05483

Kinsella, D. (2005). No rest for the democratic peace. American Political Science Review, 99, 453–457.

Klaczynski, L. (2016). Haag’s theorem in renormalised quantum field theories. https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.00662

Kleene, S. C. (1943). Recursive predicates and quantifiers. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 53, 41–73. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1990131

———. (1952). Introduction to Metamathematics. North-Holland Publishing.

Klocksiem, J. (2019). Against reductive ethical naturalism. Philosophical Studies, 176, 1991–2010.

Koch, C., Massimini, M., Boly, M., & Tononi, G. (2016). Neural correlates of consciousness: Progress and problems. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 17, 307–321.

Kochen, S. & Specker, E. P. (1967). The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17, 59–87.

Konnikova, M. (2012). Humanities aren’t a science. Stop treating them like one. Scientific American Blogs. August 10, 2012. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/literally-psyched/humanities-arent-a-science-stop-treating-them-like-one/

Kontsevich, M. & Segal, G. (2021). Wick rotation and the positivity of energy in quantum field theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.10161

Koons, R. C. (2000). The incompatibility of naturalism and scientific realism. In W. L. Craig & J. P. Moreland (Eds.), Naturalism: A critical analysis. Routledge.

Korb, K. B. (2001). Machine learning as philosophy of science. In Proceedings of the ECML-PKDD-01 Workshop on Machine Learning as Experimental Philosophy of Science. Freiburg.

Kornai, A. (2023). Vector Semantics. Springer.

Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and Sanity. New York: The Science Press Printing Co.

Kosinski, M. (2023). Theory of mind may have spontaneously emerged in large language models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.02083

Kovarik, V. et al. (2022). Rethinking formal models of partially observable multiagent decision making. Artificial Intelligence, 303, 103645. https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.11110

Krenn, M. et al. (2022). On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence. Nature Reviews Physics. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42254-022-00518-3

Krikorian, Y. H. (1944). Naturalism and the Human Spirit. Columbia University Press.

Kripke, S. A. (1959). A completeness theorem in modal logic. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 24, 1–14. http://naturalthinker.net/trl/texts/Kripke,Saul/Kripke%20S.%20-%20A%20Completeness%20Theorem%20in%20Modal%20Logic.pdf

———. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press. (Originally published in 1972).

Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2012). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2012, 1097–1105. https://papers.nips.cc/paper/4824-imagenet-classification-with-deep-convolutional-neural-networks.pdf

Kruschke, J. K. & Liddell, T. M. (2018). The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 178–206. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4

Kubrick, S. (1968). Playboy Interview: Stanley Kubrick. Playboy Magazine, 9, 94. https://galacticjourney.org/stories/PB_1968-09_Kubrik-Interview.pdf

Kuhn, H. W. (1950). A simplified two-person poker. Contributions to the Theory of Games, 1, 97–103.

Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

Kun, J. (2018). A Programmer’s Introduction to Mathematics. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

Kurzweil, R. (2012). How to Create a Mind. Penguin Books.

Ladyman, J., Ross, D., Spurrett, D., & Collier, J. (2007). Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalised. Oxford University Press.

Lan, Z. et al. (2019). ALBERT: A lite BERT for self-supervised learning of language representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.11942

Lanctot, M. (2013). Monte Carlo Sample and Regret Minimization for Equilibrium Computation and Decision-Making in Large Extensive Form Games. University of Alberta. (PhD thesis). http://mlanctot.info/files/papers/PhD_Thesis_MarcLanctot.pdf

Lanctot, M. et al. (2017). A unified game-theoretic approach to multiagent reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.00832

Lanctot, M., Waugh, K., Zinkevich, M., & Bowling, M. (2009). Monte Carlo sampling for regret minimization in extensive games. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 22, 1078–1086. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2009/file/00411460f7c92d2124a67ea0f4cb5f85-Paper.pdf

Landgrebe, J. & Smith, B. (2023). Why Machines Will Never Rule the World: Artificial Intelligence Without Fear. Routledge.

Lauc, D. (2020). Machine learning and the philosophical problems of induction. In S. Skansi (Ed.), Guide To Deep Learning Basics: Logical, Historical And Philosophical Perspectives (pp. 93–106). Springer.

Laughlin, R. B. & Pines, D. (2000). The theory of everything. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 28–31.

Lavers, G. (2004). Carnap, semantics and ontology. Erkenntnis, 60, 295–316.

———. (2015). Carnap, Quine, quantification and ontology. In Quantifiers, Quantifiers, and Quantifiers: Themes in logic, metaphysics, and language (pp. 271–299). Springer.

Law, S. (2010). The evil-god challenge. Religious Studies, 46, 353–373. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40927250

Lawhead, J. (2016). My Scientism. (Post and discussion on Google+). https://web.archive.org/web/20160316131553/https://plus.google.com/+JonLawhead/posts/5gkhSHYCCdG

Lawvere, F. W. (1963). Functorial Semantics of Algebraic Theories and Some Algebraic Problems in the context of Functorial Semantics of Algebraic Theories. Columbia University. (Ph.D. thesis). http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/reprints/articles/5/tr5abs.html

Lazarovici, D. (2018). Against fields. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 8, 145–170. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00855

Leah, R. (2018). “How do you separate fact and opinion?” Rudy Giuliani mused. Then, Stephen Colbert offered an answer. Salon. May 8, 2018. https://www.salon.com/2018/05/08/how-do-you-separate-fact-and-opinion-rudy-giuliani-mused-then-stephen-colbert-offered-an-answer

LeCun, Y. et al. (1989). Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition. Neural Computation, 1, 541–551. https://web.archive.org/web/20150611222615/http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/publis/pdf/lecun-89e.pdf

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521, 436–44.

LeCun, Y. & Bottou, L. (1998). Efficient BackProp. In G. B. Orr & K. R. Muller (Eds.), Neural Networks: Tricks of the trade. Springer. http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/publis/pdf/lecun-98b.pdf

LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998). Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86, 2278–2324. http://vision.stanford.edu/cs598_spring07/papers/Lecun98.pdf

Leemis, L. M. & McQueston, J. T. (2008). Univariate distribution relationships. The American Statistician, 62, 45–53. http://www.stat.rice.edu/~dobelman/courses/texts/leemis.distributions.2008amstat.pdf

Leggett, A. J. (2002). Testing the limits of quantum mechanics: Motivation, state of play, prospects. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 14, 415–451.

Lehmann, H., Symanzik, K., & Zimmermann, W. (1955). Zur formulierung quantisierter feldtheorien. Nuovo Cimento, 1, 205–225.

Lei, N., Luo, Z., Yau, S., & Gu, D. X. (2018). Geometric understanding of deep learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.10451

Leibniz, G. (1951). The Art of Discovery. In P. Wiener (Ed.), Leibniz: Selections. Scribner. (Originally published in 1685).

———. (1989). Dissertatio de Arte Combinatoria. In L. E. Loemker (Ed.), Philosophical Papers and Letters: The New Synthese Historical Library (Texts and Studies in the History of Philosophy), vol 2 (pp. 73–84). Springer. (Originally published in 1666).

Leibniz, G. W. (1996). New Essays on Human Understanding. (P. Remnant & J. Bennett, Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press. (Originally written in 1704).

Leifer, M. S. & Spekkens, R. W. (2013). Towards a formulation of quantum theory as a causally neutral theory of Bayesian inference. Physical Review A, 88, 052130. https://arxiv.org/abs/1107.5849

Leiter, B. (2019). The death of God and the death of morality. The Monist, 102, 386–402.

Leitgeb, H. (2023). Vindicating the verifiability criterion. Philosophical Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-023-02071-w

Leitgeb, H. & Carus, A. (2020). Rudolf Carnap. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/carnap/index.html

Leitgeb, H., Nodelman, U., & Zalta, E. N. (2025). A defense of logicism. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 31, 88–152. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bulletin-of-symbolic-logic/article/defense-of-logicism/A7F3DFF29C85BE044C6DDBBBB81CA6B4

Lepine, D. (2016). Deligne’s theorem on tensor categories. https://alistairsavage.ca/pubs/Lepine-Deligne_Theorem.pdf

Lettvin, J. Y., Maturanat, H. R., McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. H. (1959). What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, 47, 1940.

Lewis, C. I. (1917). The issues concerning material implication. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 14, 350–356. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2940255

Lewis, C. S. (1947). Miracles: A Preliminary Study. Geoffrey Bles.

———. (1955). Surprised by Joy. Harvest.

Lewis, D. (1970). How to define theoretical terms. The Journal of Philosophy, 67, 427–446. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2023861

———. (1981). Causal decision theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 59, 5–30. https://www.andrewmbailey.com/dkl/Causal_Decision_Theory.pdf

———. (1986a). On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.

———. (1986b). Philosophical Papers II. Oxford University Press.

Lewis, D. K. (1969). Policing the Aufbau. Philosophical Studies, 20, 13–17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4318613

Lewis, M. et al. (2019). BART: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.13461

Li, H. et al. (2020). Regret minimization via novel vectorized sampling policies and exploration. http://aaai-rlg.mlanctot.info/2020/papers/AAAI20-RLG_paper_14.pdf

Lin, H. W., Tegmark, M., & Rolnick, D. (2017). Why does deep and cheap learning work so well? Journal of Statistical Physics, 168, 1223–1247. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10955-017-1836-5

Lin, H. & Jegelka, S. (2018). ResNet with one-neuron hidden layers is a universal approximator. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.10909

Lin, J. Y. (1995). The Needham Puzzle: Why the industrial revolution did not originate in China. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 43, 269–292.

Linde, A. D. (1982). A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems. Physics Letters B, 108, 389–393. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370269382912199

———. (1983). Chaotic inflation. Physics Letters B, 129, 177–181.

Linsky, B. & Zalta, E. N. (1995). Naturalized platonism versus platonized naturalism. Journal of Philosophy, 92, 525–555. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2940786

———. (2006). What is Neologicism? Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 12, 60–99. http://mally.stanford.edu/Papers/neologicism2.pdf

Lisi, A. G. (2007). An exceptionally simple theory of everything. https://arxiv.org/abs/0711.0770

———. (2017). Emergence. https://www.edge.org/response-detail/27149

Lista, L. (2016a). Practical statistics for particle physicists. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04150

———. (2016b). Statistical Methods for Data Analysis in Particle Physics. Springer. http://foswiki.oris.mephi.ru/pub/Main/Literature/st_methods_for_data_analysis_in_particle_ph.pdf

Lisy, V. & Bowling, M. (2016). Equilibrium approximation quality of current no-limit poker bots. https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.07547

Liu, H., Dai, Z., So, D. R., & Le, Q. V. (2021). Pay attention to MLPs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.08050

Liu, Y. et al. (2019). RoBERTa: A robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11692

———. (2021). A survey of visual transformers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.06091

Liu, Z. et al. (2024). KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.19756

Liu, Z., Lin, Y., & Sun, M. (2023). Representation Learning for Natural Language Processing. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-99-1600-9

Liu, Z., Madhavan, V., & Tegmark, M. (2022). AI Poincare 2: Machine learning conservation laws from differential equations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.12610

Lloyd, S. (1993). Quantum-mechanical computers and uncomputability. Physical Review Letters, 71, 943–46.

Loeb, D. (2003). Gastronomic realism: A cautionary tale. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 23, 30–49. https://philpapers.org/rec/DONGR

Loewer, B. (1997). A guide to naturalizing semantics. In W. Hale B. & A. Miller (Eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language (pp. 174–196). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. https://sites.rutgers.edu/barry-loewer/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2019/06/A_Companion_to_the_Philosophy_of_Language_-_Chapter_8_A_Guide_to_Naturalizing_Semantics_.pdf

———. (2019). Humean laws and explanation. Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology, 23, 373–385.

Loh, W. Y. (1987). Calibrating confidence coefficients. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 155–162. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478408

Longpre, S. (2024). Consent in crisis: The rapid decline of the AI data commons. https://www.dataprovenance.org/Consent_in_Crisis.pdf

Lovering, C. & Pavlick, E. (2022). Unit testing for concepts in neural networks. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 10, 1193–1208. https://aclanthology.org/2022.tacl-1.69/

LSND Collaboration. (1996). Evidence for neutrino oscillations from muon decay at rest. Physical Review C, 54, 2685–2708. https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-ex/9605001

———. (2001). Evidence for neutrino oscillations from the observation of electron anti-neutrinos in a muon anti-neutrino beam. Physical Review D, 64, 112007. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0104049

Lu, C. et al. (2024). The AI Scientist: Towards fully automated open-ended scientific discovery. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06292

Lu, Z. et al. (2017). The expressive power of neural networks: A view from the width. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/file/32cbf687880eb1674a07bf717761dd3a-Paper.pdf

Lucretius. (1995). On the Nature of Things: De Rerum Natura. (A. M. Esolen, Trans.). Johns Hopkins University Press. (Originally written in the first century BCE).

Lugg, A. (2006). Russell as a precursor of Quine. Bertrand Russell Society Quarterly, 128, 9–21. https://bertrandrussellsocietyorg.files.wordpress.com/2020/04/brsq_0128-0129.pdf

Lundberg, I., Johnson, R., & Stewart, B. M. (2021). What is your estimand? Defining the target quantity connects statistical evidence to theory. American Sociological Review, 86, 532–565. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00031224211004187

Lyons, L. (2008). Open statistical issues in particle physics. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2, 887–915. https://projecteuclid.org/journals/annals-of-applied-statistics/volume-2/issue-3/Open-statistical-issues-in-Particle-Physics/10.1214/08-AOAS163.full

Lyre, H. (2008). Does the Higgs mechanism exist? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 22, 119–133. https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.1359

Ma, S. et al. (2024). The era of 1-bit LLMs: All large language models are in 1.

Ma, X. et al. (2024). Megalodon: Efficient LLM pretraining and inference with unlimited context length. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08801

Mac Suibhne, S. (2009). Wrestle to be the man philosophy wished to make you: Marcus Aurelius, reflective practitioner. Reflective Practice, 10, 429–436.

MacDonald, M. (1936). Russell and McTaggart. Philosophy, 11, 322–335. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3746190

MacFarlane, J. (2021). Philosophical Logic: A contemporary introduction. Routledge.

MacFarquhar, L. (2014). Two Heads: A marriage devoted to the mind-body problem. New Yorker. July 21, 2014. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/02/12/two-heads

Mach, E. (1914). The Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of the Physical. (C. M. Williams & S. Waterlow, Trans.). Open Court.

MacKay, D. J. C. (2003). Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press.

Mackie, J. L. (1982). The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and against the existence of God. Oxford University Press.

———. (2007). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Penguin. (First edition published in 1977).

Maddox, W. J., Benton, G., & Wilson, A. G. (2023). Rethinking parameter counting in deep models: Effective dimensionality revisited. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.02139

Maddy, P. (2007). Second Philosophy. Oxford University Press.

Mahner, M. & Bunge, M. (1996). Is religious education compatible with science education? Science & Education, 5, 101–123. https://www.hpsst.com/uploads/6/2/9/3/62931075/bunge___mahner__1996__sc.___religion.pdf

Mahowald, K. et al. (2023). Dissociating language and thought in large language models: a cognitive perspective. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.06627

Makowsky, J. A. (1995). The impact of model theory on theoretical computer science. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 134, 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-237X(06)80047-9

Malament, D. B. (1996). In defence of dogma: Why there cannot be a relativistic quantum mechanics of (localizable) particles. In R. Clifton (Ed.), Perspectives on Quantum Reality (pp. 1–10). Springer.

Maldacena, J. M. (1998). The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 2, 231–252. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9711200

Manton, N. S. (2019). The inevitability of sphalerons in field theory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 377, 20180327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0327

Marchetti, G. L., Hillar, C., Kragic, D., & Sanborn, S. (2023). Harmonics of learning: Universal fourier features emerge in invariant networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.08550

Marcus, G. (2018). Deep learning: A critical appraisal. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00631

Mark, J. T. & Marion, B. (2010). Natural selection and veridical perceptions. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 266, 504–515. http://cogsci.uci.edu/~ddhoff/PerceptualEvolution.pdf

Marks, J. M. (2009). Why I Am Not A Scientist: Anthropology and Modern Science. University of California Press.

Marletto, C. (2015). Constructor theory of life. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 12, 20141226. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345487/

Marschall, B. (2021). Carnap and Beth on the limits of tolerance. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 51, 282–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2021.16

———. (2022). Carnap’s philosophy of mathematics. Philosophy Compass, 17, 12884. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12884

Marsh, A. (2016). Gauge theories and fiber bundles: Definitions, pictures, and results. https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.03089

Marshal, M. (2011). You’d beat a Neanderthal in a race. New Scientist. February 2, 2011. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20927984-700-youd-beat-a-neanderthal-in-a-race/

Marshall, S. J. (2001). The Mandate of Heaven: Hidden History in the Book of Changes. Routledge Curzon.

Martens, N. (2022). Dark matter realism. Foundations of Physics, 52, 1–19. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10701-021-00524-y

Martin, J. (2012). Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask). https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.3365

Martin, S. P. (2011). Phenomenology of particle physics. https://www.ippp.dur.ac.uk/~mspannow/files/Phenomenology_Particle_Physics_Martin.pdf

———. (2016). A supersymmetry primer. (First published in 1997). https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9709356

Martin, S. P. & Wells, J. (2023). Elementary Particles and Their Interactions. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-14368-7

Martin-Dussaud, P., Rovelli, C., & Zalamea, F. (2018). The notion of locality in relational quantum mechanics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.08150

Martínez-Ordaz, M. R. (2021a). Is there anything special about the ignorance involved in big data practices? http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/19671/

———. (2021b). The ignorance behind inconsistency toleration. Synthese, 198, 8665–8686. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/19672/

Maslej, N. et al. (2023). The AI Index 2023 Annual Report. https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/HAI_AI-Index-Report_2023.pdf

———. (2024). The AI Index 2024 Annual Report. https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/HAI_AI-Index-Report-2024.pdf

Maudlin, T. (1995). Three measurement problems. Topoi, 14, 7–15.

———. (1996). Quantum Nonlocality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics. Wiley-Blackwell.

———. (1998). Healey on the Aharonov-Bohm effect. Philosophy of Science, 65, 361–368. https://www.jstor.org/stable/188266

———. (2007). The Metaphysics Within Physics. Oxford University Press.

———. (2012). Philosophy of Physics: Space and Time. Princeton University Press.

———. (2014). What Bell did. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 47, 424010. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424010/pdf

———. (2018). Ontological clarity via canonical presentation: Electromagnetism and the Aharonov-Bohm effect. Entropy, 20, 465. https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/20/6/465

———. (2019). Philosophy of Physics: Quantum Theory. Princeton University Press.

Maxwell, G. (1968). Scientific methodology and the causal theory of perception. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 49, 148–177.

Mayo, D. G. (1981). In defense of the Neyman-Pearson theory of confidence intervals. Philosophy of Science, 48, 269–280.

———. (1996). Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago University Press.

———. (2014). On the Birnbaum Argument for the Strong Likelihood Principle,. Statistical Science, 29, 227–266.

———. (2018). Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Statistics Wars. Cambridge University Press.

———. (2019). The law of likelihood and error statistics. https://errorstatistics.com/2019/04/04/excursion-1-tour-ii-error-probing-tools-versus-logics-of-evidence-excerpt/

———. (2021). Significance tests: Vitiated or vindicated by the replication crisis in psychology? Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 12, 101–121. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13164-020-00501-w

Mayo, D. G. & Spanos, A. (2006). Severe testing as a basic concept in a Neyman-Pearson philosophy of induction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57, 323–357.

———. (2011). Error statistics. In Philosophy of Statistics (pp. 153–198). North-Holland.

McCarthy, C. (2017). The Kekulé Problem. Nautilus, 47. https://nautil.us/issue/47/consciousness/the-kekul-problem

McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (1955). A proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/dartmouth.pdf

McComas, W. F. (1996). Ten myths of science: Reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 10–16.

———. (2002). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The Nature of Science in Science Education (pp. 53–70). Springer Netherlands.

———. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17.

McCrea, A. (2019). The magical thinking of guys who love logic. The Outline. February 15, 2019. https://theoutline.com/post/7083/the-magical-thinking-of-guys-who-love-logic

McCrimmon, K. (2000). A Taste of Jordan Algebras. Springer. http://old.math.nsc.ru/LBRT/a1/files/mccrimmon.pdf

McCulloch, W. & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115–133. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02478259.pdf

McDermott, J. (2019). When and why metaheuristics researchers can ignore "no free lunch" theorems. https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.03280

McDougall, C. et al. (2023). Copy suppression: Comprehensively understanding an attention head. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04625

McEvilley, T. (2002). The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative studies in Greek and Indian philosophies. Allworth Press.

McFadden, D. & Zarembka, P. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers in Econometrics (pp. 105–142). New York: Academic Press.

McGuinness, B. (2008). Wittgenstein in Cambridge: Letters and Documents 1911-1951. Wiley-Blackwell.

McKay, S. (2020). The marvel of language: Knowns, unknowns, and maybes. Rocky Mountain Review, 74, 49–69. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26977687

McMahan, D. L. (2004). Modernity and the early discourse of scientific Buddhism. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 72, 897–933. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40005933

McManus, M. (2020). Myth and mayhem: A leftist critique of Jordan Peterson. https://areomagazine.com/2020/04/19/myth-and-mayhem-a-leftist-critique-of-jordan-peterson/

McNutt, P. M. (1999). Reconstructing the Society of Ancient Israel. Westminster John Knox Press.

McRobert, J. (2002). Mary Shepherd’s two senses of necessary connection. https://philpapers.org/rec/MCRMST-2

McTaggart, J. E. (1908). The unreality of time. Mind, 17, 457–474. https://philarchive.org/archive/MCTTUO

Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.

Meng, K., Bau, D., Andonian, A., & Belinkov, Y. (2023). Locating and editing factual associations in GPT https://arxiv.

Mermin, N. D. (1985). Is the moon there when nobody looks? Reality and the quantum theory. Physics Today, 38, 38–47.

———. (1990). Quantum mysteries revisited. American Journal of Physics, 58, 731–734.

———. (2022). A note on the quantum measurement problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10741

Merrill, W. & Sabharwal, A. (2022). The parallelism tradeoff: Limitations of log-precision transformers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00729

Mialon, G. et al. (2023). Augmented Language Models: a Survey. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.07842

MicroBooNE Collaboration. (2021). Search for neutrino-induced neutral current Δ radiative decay in MicroBooNE and a first test of the MiniBooNE low energy excess under a single-photon hypothesis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.00409

MICrONS Consortium. (2025). Functional connectomics spanning multiple areas of mouse visual cortex. Nature, 640, 435–447. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08790-w

Mikkola, M. (2009). Gender concepts and intuitions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 39, 559–583. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27822065

Mikolov, T. et al. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.4546

Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781

Mikolov, T., Yih, W. T., & Zweig, G. (2013). Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations. NAACL HLT 2013. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N13-1090.pdf

Milkov, N. (2013). The Berlin Group and the Vienna Circle: Affinities and divergences. In N. Milkov & V. Peckhaus (Eds.), The Berlin Group and the Philosophy of Logical Empiricism (pp. 3–32). Springer.

Mill, J. S. (1843). A System of Logic. New York: Harper and Brothers.

———. (1865). Auguste Comte and Positivism. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/16833/16833-h/16833-h.htm

———. (1877). An Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy, vol II. New York: Henry Holt and Co.

MiniBooNE Collaboration. (2018). Significant excess of electron-like events in the MiniBooNE short-baseline neutrino experiment. Physical Review Letters, 121, 221801. https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.12028

Minsky, M. & Papert, S. (1969). Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry. MIT Press.

Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., & Wheeler, J. A. (1973). Gravitation. Freeman and Co. (Reprinted by Princeton University Press (2017)).

Mitchell, T. M. (1980). The need for biases in learning generalizations. In Readings in Machine Learning (pp. 184–192). San Mateo, CA, USA. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/usr/mitchell/ftp/pubs/NeedForBias_1980.pdf

Mnih, V. et al. (2013). Playing Atari with deep reinforcement learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5602

———. (2015). Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518, 529–533. http://files.davidqiu.com//research/nature14236.pdf

Mohamadi, S. et al. (2023). ChatGPT in the age of generative AI and large language models: A concise survey. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04251v1

Molinari, L. G. (2006). Another proof of Gell-Mann and Low’s theorem. https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0612030

Monk, J. D. (1976). Mathematical Logic. Springer.

Montero, B. (1999). The Body Problem. Nous, 33, 183–200.

Moore, G. E. (1899). The nature of judgment. Mind, 8, 176–193. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2247657.pdf

———. (1903). The refutation of idealism. Mind, 12, 433–453. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2248251.pdf

———. (1925). A defence of common sense. In J. H. Muirhead (Ed.), Contemporary British Philosophy (pp. 147–170). London: Allen and Unwin.

———. (1939). Proof of an external world. Proceedings of the British Academy, 25, 273–300.

———. (1988). Principia Ethica. Prometheus Books. (First published in 1903).

Moore, J. (2009). John Irving on religion, sports and Owen Meany. The Denver Post. April 2, 2009. https://www.denverpost.com/2009/04/02/john-irving-on-religion-sports-and-owen-meany/

Moore, M. B. & Kelle, B. E. (2011). Biblical History and Israel’s Past: The Changing Study of the Bible and History. Eerdmans.

Morales, J. A. C. & Zilber, B. (2014). The geometric semantics of algebraic quantum mechanics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.7277

Moravcik, M. et al. (2017). DeepStack: Expert-level artificial intelligence in heads-up no-limit poker. Science, 356, 508–513. https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.01724

Moravec, H. (1998). When will computer hardware match the human brain? Journal of Evolution and Technology, 1. https://jetpress.org/volume1/moravec.htm

Moretti, V. (2015). Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics: An advanced short course. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06951

———. (2023). On the relativistic spatial localization for massive real scalar Klein-Gordon quantum particles. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02133

Morgan, M. S. & Morrison, M. (1999). Models as Mediators. Cambridge University Press.

Morris, K. (2019). Physicalism Deconstructed: Levels of reality and the mind-body problem. Cambridge University Press.

Muennighoff, N. et al. (2023). Scaling data-constrained language models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16264

Mulders, P. J. (2011). Quantum field theory. https://www.nat.vu.nl/~mulders/QFT-0.pdf

Murayama, H. (2000). Supersymmetry phenomenology. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0002232

Murphy, K. P. (2012). Machine Learning: A probabilistic perspective. MIT Press.

———. (2022). Probabilistic Machine Learning: An introduction. MIT Press.

Murzi, M. (2001). Rudolf Carnap (1891-1970). Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/carnap/

———. (2004). Vienna circle. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/viennacr/

Muthukumar, V., Vodrahalli, K., Subramanian, V., & Sahai, A. (2019). Harmless interpolation of noisy data in regression. https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.09139

Myrvold, W. C. (2015). What is a wavefunction? Synthese, 192, 3247–3274. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/11117/

Nado, J. (2024). Truth in philosophy: a conceptual engineering approach. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-024-00151-0

Nagarajan, V. (2021). Explaining generalization in deep learning: progress and fundamental limits. (Ph.D. thesis). https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.08922

Nagarjuna. (1995). The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way. (J. L. Garfield, Trans.). Oxford University Press.

Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. Harcourt.

———. (2008). Issues in the logic of reductive explanations. In M. A. Bedau & P. Humphreys (Eds.), Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science (pp. 359–373). MIT Press. https://perpus.univpancasila.ac.id/repository/EBUPT180357.pdf

Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/iatl/study/ugmodules/humananimalstudies/lectures/32/nagel_bat.pdf

Nagele, C., Janssen, O., & Kleban, M. (2023). Decoherence: A numerical study. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 56, 085301. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1751-8121/acb977

Nail, T. (2018). Lucretius I: An Ontology of Motion. Edinburgh University Press.

Nakkiran, P. (2021). Turing-universal learners with optimal scaling laws. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.05321

Nakkiran, P. et al. (2019). Deep double descent: Where bigger models and more data hurt. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02292

Nakkiran, P., Bradley, A., Zhou, H., & Advani, M. (2024). Step-by-step diffusion: An elementary tutorial. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08929

Nanamoli. (1992). The Life of the Buddha: According to the Pali Canon. Buddhist Publication Society.

Nave, C. R. (2016). Transparency of water in the visible range. HyperPhysics. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Chemical/watabs.html

Neller, T. W. & Lanctot, M. (2013). An introduction to counterfactual regret minimization. Proceedings of Model AI Assignments, 11. http://cs.gettysburg.edu/~tneller/modelai/2013/cfr/cfr.pdf

Nelson, E. S. (2011). The Yijing and philosophy: From Leibniz to Derrida. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 38, 377–396. https://philarchive.org/rec/NELTYA

Neuber, M. (2014). Critical realism in perspective: Remarks on a neglected current in Neo-Kantian epistemology. In M. C. G. et al (Ed.), The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective: New Directions in the Philosophy of Science (pp. 657–673). Springer. https://philpapers.org/rec/NEUCRI

Neurath, O. (1973). Anti-Spengler. In M. Neurath & R. S. Cohen (Eds.), Empiricism and Sociology (pp. 158–213). Dordrecht: Reidel. (Originally published in 1921).

———. (1983). Protocol statements. In R. S. Cohen & M. Neurath (Eds.), Otto Neurath Philosophical Papers, 1913-1946 (pp. 91–99). Dordrecht: Reidel. (Originally published in 1933).

Neurath, O., Carnap, R., & Morris, C. W. (1955). International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. 1. University of Chicago Press.

Newton, I. (2016). The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. (I. B. Cohen, A. Whitman, & J. Budenz, Trans.). University of California Press. (Originally published in 1687).

Newton, T. D. & Wigner, E. P. (1949). Localized states for elementary systems. Reviews of Modern Physics, 21, 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.21.400

Ney, A. (2012). Neo-positivist metaphysics. Philosophical Studies, 160, 53–78. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11098-012-9912-9

———. (2014). Metaphysics: An introduction. Routledge.

———. (2018). The Politics of Fundamentality. https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3095

———. (2019). Are the questions of metaphysics more fundamental than those of science?. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. (forthcoming).

———. (2021a). From quantum entanglement to spatiotemporal distance. In Christian Wüthrich Baptiste Le Bihan & N. Huggett (Eds.), Philosophy Beyond Spacetime. Oxford University Press.

———. (2021b). The fundamentality of physics: Completeness or maximality. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, 12, 203. https://philpapers.org/rec/NEYTFO

Ney, A. & Albert, D. Z. (2013). The Wave Function: Essays on the metaphysics of quantum mechanics. Oxford University Press.

Neyman, J. (1955). The problem of inductive inference. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 8, 13–45. https://errorstatistics.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/neyman-1955-the-problem-of-inductive-inference-searchable.pdf

———. (1977). Frequentist probability and frequentist statistics. Synthese, 36, 97–131.

Neyman, J. & Pearson, E. S. (1933). On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 231, 289–337.

Nguyen, T. (2016). The perturbative approach to path integrals: A succinct mathematical treatment. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 57, 092301. https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04809

Nielsen, F. (2013). Cramer-Rao lower bound and information geometry. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3578

———. (2020). An elementary introduction to information geometry. Entropy, 22, 1100. https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/22/10/1100

Nietzsche, F. (2004). Ecce Homo: How One Becomes What One Is and The Antichrist: A Curse on Christianity. Algora Publishing.

Nigg, D. et al. (2015). Can different quantum state vectors correspond to the same physical state? An experimental test. New Journal of Physics, 18, 013007. https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.0942

Nikolić, H. (2007). Quantum mechanics: Myths and facts. Foundations of Physics, 37, 1563–1611. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10701-007-9176-y.pdf

———. (2022). Relativistic QFT from a Bohmian perspective: A proof of concept. Foundations of Physics, 52, 80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-022-00600-x

Nirenburg, S. (1996). Bar Hillel and Machine Translation: Then and Now.

Nissim, M., Noord, R. van, & Goot, R. van der. (2019). Fair is better than sensational: Man is to doctor as woman is to doctor. Computational Linguistics, 46, 487–497.

nLab authors. (2021a). Causal perturbation theory. https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/causal+perturbation+theory

———. (2021b). Fiber bundles in physics. https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/fiber+bundles+in+physics

Nodelman, U. & Zalta, E. N. (2014). Foundations for mathematical structuralism. Mind, 123, 39–78. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24489523

Noether, E. (1918). Invariante variationsprobleme. Nachrichten von Der Gesellschaft Der Wissenschaften Zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, 235.

Nola, R. (1999). On the possibility of a scientific theory of scientific method. Science & Education, 8, 427–439.

Nola, R. & Sankey, H. (2007). Theories of Scientific Method. Stocksfield: Acumen.

Norton, J. D. (1993). General covariance and the foundations of general relativity: Eight decades of dispute. Reports on Progress in Physics, 56, 791–858. https://web.archive.org/web/20171124074404/http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/decades.pdf

———. (2017). Einstein on Kant. https://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/HPS_0410/chapters/significance_GR_geometry/Einstein_on_Kant.html

Norvig, P. (2011). On Chomsky and the Two Cultures of Statistical Learning. https://norvig.com/chomsky.html

Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Harvard University Press.

———. (2001). Invariances. Harvard University Press.

———. (2013). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books. (First edition published in 1974).

O’Hagan, A. (2010). Kendall’s Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol 2B: Bayesian Inference. Wiley.

O’Keefe, T. (2001). Epicurus. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/epicur/

O’Neill, G. K. (1974). The colonization of space. Physics Today, 27, 32–40. https://pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/article/27/9/32/429507/The-colonization-of-spaceCareful-engineering-and

O’Neill, J. & Uebel, T. (2004). Horkheimer and Neurath: Restarting a disrupted debate. European Journal of Philosophy, 12, 75–105.

O’Raifeartaigh, L. (1997). The Dawning of Gauge Theory. Princeton University Press.

Ogden, C. K. & Richards, I. A. (1989). The Meaning of Meaning. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. (Original published in 1923 by Kegan Paul).

Ohanian, H. C. (1986). What is spin? American Journal of Physics, 54, 500.

Okasha, S. (2006). Evolution and the Levels of Selection. Oxford University Press.

Open Logic Project. (2020). The Open Logic Text. https://openlogicproject.org/

OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 Technical Report. https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4.pdf

Oppenheim, P. & Putnam, H. (1958). Unity of science as a working hypothesis. In H. F. et al. (Ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II. Minnesota University Press.

Opper, M. (2001). Learning to generalize. Frontiers of Life, 3, 763–775.

Opper, M. & Kinzel, W. (1996). Statistical mechanics of generalization. In Models of Neural Networks III: Association, Generalization, and Representation (pp. 151–209). Springer New York. https://gwern.net/doc/ai/nn/1996-opper.pdf

Ord, T. (2024). Bounds on the rates of growth and convergence of all physical processes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10928

Ostrik, V. (2004). Tensor categories (after Deligne). https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0401347

Otsuka, J. (2023). Thinking About Statistics: The Philosophical Foundations. Routledge.

Ouyang, L. et al. (2022). Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02155

Overgaard, S., Gilbert, P., & Burwood, S. (2013). What is philosophy? In An Introduction to Metaphilosophy (pp. 17–44). Cambridge University Press.

Palmer, T. N. (1995). A local deterministic model of quantum spin measurement. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 451, 585–608. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9505025

———. (2009). The invariant set postulate: A new geometric framework for the foundations of quantum theory and the role played by gravity. https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.1148

———. (2016). Invariant set theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.01051

Pandey, R. (2024). gzip predicts data-dependent scaling laws. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.16684

Papineau, D. (2007). Naturalism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/naturalism/

———. (2012). Philosophical Devices: Proofs, Probabilities, Possibilities, and Sets. Oxford University Press.

Parekh, B. (2006). Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory (2nd ed.). Palgrave MacMillan.

Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Pearsons. Clarendon Press.

Park, N. & Kim, S. (2022). How do vision transformers work? https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.06709

Park, S. (2021). Embracing Scientific Realism. Springer.

Parkes, G. (2011). Heidegger and Japanese fascism: An unsubstantiated connection. In Japanese and Continental Philosophy: Conversations with the Kyoto School (pp. 247–265). Indiana University Press.

Passmore, J. (1967). Logical positivism. In P. Edwards (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Volume 5 (pp. 52–57). New York: Macmillan.

Patel, R. & Pavlick, E. (2022). Mapping language models to grounded conceptual spaces. International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022. https://openreview.net/pdf?id=gJcEM8sxHK

Pati, J. C. & Salam, A. (1974). Lepton number as the fourth color. Physical Review D, 10, 275–289. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/21fb/f9d49acf3e3f07098ca686ae4058c38dbd03.pdf

Patterson, G. (2007). Jean Perrin and the triumph of the atomic doctrine. Endeavour, 31, 50–53.

Paul, L. A. (2012). Metaphysics as modeling: The handmaiden’s tale. Philosophical Studies, 160, 1–29.

Pauli, W. (1941). Relativistic field theories of elementary particles. Reviews of Modern Physics, 13, 203–232.

Pearl, J. (2009). Causal inference in statistics: An overview. Statistics Surveys, 3, 96–146. https://projecteuclid.org/journals/statistics-surveys/volume-3/issue-none/Causal-inference-in-statistics-An-overview/10.1214/09-SS057.pdf

———. (2018). The Book of Why: The new science of cause and effect. Basic Books.

Pearson, K. (1900). On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 50, 157–175.

Peirce, C. S. (1883). Studies in Logic. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.

———. (1923). Chance, Love and Logic. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.

Peng, B. et al. (2023). RWKV: Reinventing RNNs for the Transformer Era. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.13048

Penington, G. (2019). Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08255

Penrose, R. (1971). Angular momentum: an approach to combinatorial spacetime. In T. Bastin (Ed.), Quantum Theory and Beyond (pp. 151–180). Cambridge University Press. https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/penrose/

Percacci, R. (2024). Non-Perturbative Quantum Field Theory: An Introduction to Topological and Semiclassical Methods. SISSA Medialab. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/96025/9788898587056.pdf

Perone, C. S. (2018). NLP word representations and the Wittgenstein philosophy of language. http://blog.christianperone.com/2018/05/nlp-word-representations-and-the-wittgenstein-philosophy-of-language/

Perrault, R. et al. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2025. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, Stanford University. https://hai-production.s3.amazonaws.com/files/hai_ai_index_report_2025.pdf

Perrin, A. J. (2017). Stop blaming postmodernism for post-truth politics. The Chronicle of Higher Education. August 4, 2017. http://www.chronicle.com/article/Stop-Blaming-Postmodernism-for/240845

Perrin, J. (1913). Les Atomes. Paris: Libraire Felix Alcan.

Peskin, M. E. (1994). Spin, mass, and symmetry. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9405255

Peskin, M. E. & Schroeder, D. V. (1995). An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Westview Press.

Pessa, E. (2009). The concept of particle in quantum field theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.0178

Peters, J., Janzing, D., & Scholkopf, B. (2017). Elements of Causal Inference. MIT Press.

Peterson, J. B. (1999). Maps of Meaning. Routledge.

Pettigrew, R. & Weisberg, J. (2019). The Open Handbook of Formal Epistemology. PhilPapers. https://jonathanweisberg.org/pdf/open-handbook-of-formal-epistemology.pdf

Pettit, P. (1983). The possibility of aesthetic realism. In E. Schaper (Ed.), Pleasure, Preference and Value: Studies in philosophical aesthetics. Cambridge University Press.

Phillips, P. W. (2023). Fifty years of Wilsonian renormalization and counting. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02484

Phuong, M. & Hutter, M. (2022). Formal algorithms for transformers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.09238

Piantadosi, S. T. (2023). Modern language models refute Chomsky’s approach to language. https://lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/007180

Pierre Auger Collaboration. (2007). Correlation of the highest-energy cosmic rays with nearby extragalactic objects. Science, 318, 938–943.

———. (2010). Measurement of the depth of maximum of extensive air showers above 10¹⁸ eV. Physical Review Letters, 104, 091101.

———. (2020a). Features of the energy spectrum of cosmic rays above 2.5 × 10¹⁸ eV using the Pierre Auger Observatory. Physical Review Letters, 125, 121106. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.06488

———. (2020b). Measurement of the cosmic ray energy spectrum above 2.5 × 10¹⁸ eV using the Pierre Auger Observatory. Physical Review D, 102, 062005. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.06486

Pigliucci, M. (2010). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk. Chicago University Press.

———. (2017). How to be a Stoic: Using Ancient Philosophy to Live a Modern Life. Basic Books.

———. (2019). Epic battles in practical ethics: Stoicism vs Epicureanism. https://medium.com/stoicism-philosophy-as-a-way-of-life/epic-battles-in-practical-ethics-stoicism-vs-epicureanism-dc124e8dc9

Pigliucci, M. & Boudry, M. (2013). Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. The University of Chicago Press.

Pluckrose, H. (2016). Why I no longer identify as a feminist. Areo. December 26, 2016. https://areomagazine.com/2016/12/29/why-i-no-longer-identify-as-a-feminist/

———. (2017). How French “intellectuals” ruined the west: Postmodernism and its impact, explained. Areo. March 27, 2017. https://areomagazine.com/2017/03/27/how-french-intellectuals-ruined-the-west-postmodernism-and-its-impact-explained/

Poincaré, H. (1913). The Foundations of Science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method. (G. B. Halstead, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1905).

Polyakov, A. M. (2008). From quarks to strings. https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.0183

Pomerantsev, P. (2016). Why we’re post-fact. Granta. July 20, 2016. https://granta.com/why-were-post-fact/

Ponsen, M., De Jong, S., & Lanctot, M. (2011). Computing approximate Nash equilibria and robust best-responses using sampling. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 42, 575–605. https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.4591

Popper, K. R. (1952). The nature of philosophical problems and their roots in science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 3, 124–156. https://www.jstor.org/stable/685553

———. (1953). A note on Berkeley as precursor of Mach. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4, 26–36.

———. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Routledge.

———. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge. (Originally published in 1934 as Logik der Forschung and first published in English in 1959).

Popper, K. & Miller, D. (1983). A proof of the impossibility of inductive probability. Nature, 302, 687–688. https://www.nature.com/articles/302687a0

Portmore, D. (2011). Commonsense Consequentialism. Oxford University Press.

Poskett, J. (2022). Horizons: The Global Origins of Modern Science. Mariner Books.

Post, E. L. (1921). Introduction to the general theory of elementary propositions. American Journal of Mathematics, 43, 163–185.

Potochnik, A. (2011). A Neurathian conception of the unity of science. Erkenntnis, 74, 305–319.

Prado, I. (2006). Ionian enchantment: A brief history of scientific naturalism. http://www.naturalism.org/worldview-naturalism/history-of-naturalism

Prasetya, Y. (2021). Methodological naturalism and scientific success: Lessons from the scientific realism debate. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion. (forthcoming). https://philpapers.org/rec/PRAMNA

Prescod-Weinstein, C. (2017). Scientists must challenge what makes studies scientific. American Scientist. August 15, 2017. https://www.americanscientist.org/blog/macroscope/scientists-must-challenge-what-makes-studies-scientific

Preskill, J. (2013). We are all Wilsonians now. https://quantumfrontiers.com/2013/06/18/we-are-all-wilsonians-now/

———. (2018). Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00862

———. (2021). Quantum computing 40 years later. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.10522

Preston, A. (2005). George Edward Moore. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/moore/

Priest, G. (1998). What is so bad about contradictions? Journal of Philosophy, 95, 410–426.

———. (2020). Philosophy and its history: An essay in the philosophy of philosophy. Analytic Philosophy, 61, 297–303.

Prinz, J. (2011). Against empathy. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 49, 214–233.

Pritchard, D. (2004). Contemporary skepticism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/skepcont/

Proietti, M. et al. (2019). Experimental test of local observer independence. Science Advances, 5, 9832. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.05080

Psillos, S. (1999). Scientific Realism: How science tracks truth. Routledge.

———. (2001). Is structural realism possible? Philosophy of Science, 68, S13–S24.

———. (2011). On Reichenbach’s argument for scientific realism. Synthese, 181, 23–40.

Pusey, M. F., Barrett, J., & Rudolph, T. (2012). On the reality of the quantum state. Nature Physics, 8, 476. https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.3328

Putnam, H. (1971). Philosophy of Logic. New York: Harper & Row.

———. (1973). Meaning and reference. The Journal of Philosophy, 70, 699–711. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2025079

———. (1975a). A philosopher looks at quantum mechanics. In Mathematics, Matter and Method. Philosophical Papers, vol. 1 (pp. 130–158). Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1965).

———. (1975b). Mathematics, Matter, and Method. Cambridge University Press.

———. (1975c). The meaning of "meaning". In Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2 (pp. 215–271). Cambridge University Press.

———. (1975d). What is mathematical truth? Historia Mathematica, 2, 529–543.

———. (1981). Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge University Press.

———. (1997). A half century of philosophy, viewed from within. Daedalus, 126, 175–208.

———. (2004). The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Harvard University Press.

———. (2005). A philosopher looks at quantum mechanics (again)*. *The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science*, 56, 615–634. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3541860

———. (2016). Naturalism, Realism, and Normativity. Harvard University Press.

Quine, W. V. O. (1936). Truth by convention. In Philosophical Essays for Alfred North Whitehead (pp. 90–124). Longmans, Green, & Co.

———. (1948). On what there is. Review of Metaphysics, 2, 21–38.

———. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43.

———. (1960a). Carnap and logical truth. Synthese, 12, 350–374.

———. (1960b). Word and Object. MIT Press.

———. (1963). On simple theories of a complex world. Synthese, 15, 103–106.

———. (1969). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press.

———. (1970). Homage to Rudolf Carnap. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1970. XI–LXVI.

———. (1981a). Reply to Stroud. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 6, 473–476.

———. (1981b). Theories and Things. Harvard University Press.

———. (1986). Philosophy of Logic (2nd ed.). Harvard University Press.

———. (1991). Two dogmas in retrospect. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 21, 265–274.

Quine, W. V. O. & Carnap, R. (1990). Dear Carnap, Dear Van: The Quine-Carnap Correspondence and Related Work. (R. Creath, Ed.). University of California Press.

Quine, W. V. O., Schilpp, P. A., & Hahn, L. E. (1986). The Philosophy of W.V. Quine. Open Court.

Raatikainen, P. (2020). Gödel’s incompleteness theorems. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goedel-incompleteness/

Radford, A. et al. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. (Paper on the GPT-2 model by OpenAI). https://d4mucfpksywv.cloudfront.net/better-language-models/language-models.pdf

Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., & Sutskever, I. (2018). Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. (Paper on the GPT model by OpenAI). https://cdn.openai.com/research-covers/language-unsupervised/language_understanding_paper.pdf

Rae, J.W. et al. (2022). Scaling language models: Methods, analysis & insights from training Gopher. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.11446

Raffel, C. et al. (2019). Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10683

Railton, P. (1986). Moral realism. Philosophical Review, 95, 163–207.

Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2017a). Physics informed deep learning (Part I): Data-driven solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.10561

———. (2017b). Physics informed deep learning (Part II): Data-driven discovery of nonlinear partial differential equations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.10566

Raleigh, T. (2023). The emptiness of naturalism. https://philpapers.org/archive/RALTEO-3.pdf

Raman, V. V. & Forman, P. (1969). Why was it Schrödinger who developed de Broglie’s ideas? Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 1, 291–314. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27757299

Ramond, P. (1976). Introduction to exceptional Lie groups and algebras. CALT-68-577. https://inspirehep.net/literature/111550

Ramsey, F. P. (1923). Review of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus by L. Wittgenstein & B. Russell. Mind, 32, 465–478.

———. (1925). Universals. Mind, 34, 401–417.

———. (1926). Foundations of mathematics. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 25, 338–384. https://gwern.net/doc/math/1926-ramsey-2.pdf

———. (1927). Facts and propositions. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary, 7, 153–170. https://web.archive.org/web/20190120155923/https://www.aristoteliansociety.org.uk/pdf/ramsey.pdf

Rao, C. R. (1945). Information and the accuracy attainable in the estimation of statistical parameters. Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society, 37, 81–91.

———. (1947). Minimum variance and the estimation of several parameters. In Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 43, 280–283. Cambridge University Press.

———. (1997). Statisitcs and Truth: Putting Chance to Work (2nd ed.). World Scientific.

Rao, C. R. & Lovric, M. M. (2016). Testing point null hypothesis of a normal mean and the truth: 21st century perspective. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 15, 2–21. http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/jmasm/vol15/iss2/3

Rathmanner, S. & Hutter, M. (2011). A philosophical treatise of universal induction. Entropy, 13, 1076–1136. https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/13/6/1076

Raup, D. M. & Sepkoski, J. J. (1982). Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record. Science, 215, 1501–1503.

Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice (2nd ed.). Harvard University Press. (First edition published in 1971).

Rea, M. C. (2006). Naturalism and moral realism. In Knowledge and Reality (pp. 215–241). Dordrecht: Springer. https://philarchive.org/archive/REANAM-4

Read, A. L. (2002). Presentation of search results: the CLs technique. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, 28, 2693. https://indico.cern.ch/event/398949/attachments/799330/1095613/The_CLs_Technique.pdf

Reck, E. H. (2005). Frege’s influence on Wittgenstein: Reversing metaphysics via the context principle. In Gottlob Frege: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, Vol. I (pp. 241–289). London: Routledge. https://philpapers.org/archive/RECFIO.pdf

Rédei, M. (1996). Why John von Neumann did not like the Hilbert space formalism of quantum mechanics (and what he liked instead). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 27, 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-2198(96)00017-2

Redhead, M. (1975). Symmetry in intertheory relations. Synthese, 32, 77–112.

———. (1982). Quantum field theory for philosophers. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1982, 57–99.

———. (1988). A philosopher looks at quantum field theory. In H. R. Brown & R. Harré (Eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory (pp. 9–24). Oxford University Press.

———. (1999). Quantum field theory and the philosopher. In T. Y. Cao (Ed.), Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Field Theory (pp. 34–40). Cambridge University Press.

———. (2001). The intelligibility of the universe. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 48, 73–90.

Reece, R. (2007). Quantum field theory: An introduction. http://rreece.github.io/publications/pdf/2007.Reece.Quantum-Field-Theory-An-Introduction.pdf

Reichenbach, H. (1936). Logistic empiricism in Germany and the present state of its problems. The Journal of Philosophy, 33, 141–160.

———. (1938). Experience and Prediction. University of Chicago Press. https://philpapers.org/archive/REIEAP-2.pdf

———. (1940). On the justification of induction. The Journal of Philosophy, 37, 97–103.

———. (1944). Philosophic Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

———. (1968). The Rise of Scientific Philosophy. University of California Press. (Originally published in 1951).

Reichert, P. & Lazarovici, D. (2022). The point of primitive ontology. Foundations of Physics, 52, 1–18. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/21425/1/The_point_of_primitive_ontology.pdf

Reid, C. (1996). Hilbert. Copernicus.

———. (1998). Neyman. Springer-Verlag.

Reimann, M.W. et al. (2017). Cliques of neurons bound into cavities provide a missing link between structure and function. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncom.2017.00048/full

Rescher, N. (2006). The Berlin School of logical empiricism and its legacy. Erkenntnis, 64, 281–304.

Resnik, M. D. (1987). Choices: An Introduction to Decision Theory. University of Minnesota Press.

Rice, J. A. (2007). Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis (3rd ed.). Thomson.

Richards, J. R. (1980). The Sceptical Feminist: A Philosophical Enquiry. Routledge.

———. (1995). Why feminist epistemology isn’t (and the implications for feminist jurisprudence). Legal Theory, 1, 365–400.

Richardson, A. (2023). Logical Empricism as Scientific Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009471497

Richardson, A. & Tuboly, A. T. (2024). Interpreting Carnap: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.

Richter, D. J. (2004). Ludwig Wittgenstein. International Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/wittgens/

Ricks, T. E. (2006). Fiasco. Armed Forces Journal. http://armedforcesjournal.com/fiasco/

Riepe, D. (1961). The Naturalistic Traddition in Indian Thought. University of Washington Press.

Roberts, D. A. (2021). Why is AI hard and physics simple? https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.00008

Roberts, D. A., Yaida, S., & Hanin, B. (2021). The Principles of Deep Learning Theory: An Effective Theory Approach to Understanding Neural Networks. Cambridge University Press. https://deeplearningtheory.com/PDLT.pdf

Robins, J. M. & Wasserman, L. (1999). On the impossibility of inferring causation from association without background knowledge. In C. Glymour & G. Cooper (Eds.), Computation, Causation, and Discovery (pp. 305–321). AAAI & MIT Press.

Rodin, A. (2012). Axiomatic method and category theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/1210.1478

Romero, G. E. (2015). On the ontology of spacetime: Substantivalism, relationism, eternalism, and emergence. Foundations of Science, 22, 141–159.

Ronen, M., Finder, S. E., & Freifeld, O. (2022). DeepDPM: Deep clustering with an unknown number of clusters. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.14309

Roosevelt, T. (1910). Citizenship in a republic. https://www.theodorerooseveltcenter.org/Learn-About-TR/TR-Encyclopedia/Culture-and-Society/Man-in-the-Arena.aspx

Rorty, R. (1967). The Linguist Turn: Recent Essays in Philosophical Method. University of Chicago Press.

———. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press.

———. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge University Press.

———. (1993). Wittgenstein, Heidegger, and the reification of language. In C. B. Guignonn (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger (pp. 337–357). Cambridge University Press.

———. (1998). Achieving Our Country. Harvard University Press.

Rosaler, J. (2019). Reduction as an a posteriori relation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70, 269–299. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1093/bjps/axx026

———. (2022). Dogmas of effective field theory: Scheme dependence, fundamental parameters, and the many faces of the Higgs naturalness principle. Foundations of Physics, 52, 1–32. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10701-021-00510-4

Rose, C. & Sagan, C. (1996). Carl Sagan discusses Demon Haunted World with Charlie Rose. The Charlie Rose Show. TV show that aired May 27, 1996. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8HEwO-2L4w

Rosenberg, A. (2011a). The Atheist’s Guide to Reality. Norton.

———. (2011b). Why I am a naturalist. New York Times. September 17, 2011. https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/17/why-i-am-a-naturalist/

Rosenblatt, F. (1961). Principles of Neurodynamics: Perceptrons and the Theory of Brain Mechanisms. Spartan.

Ross, D. (2000). Dennett’s Philosophy: A comprehensive assessment. MIT Press.

———. (2005). Economic Theory and Cognitive Science: Microexplanation. Bradford.

Ross, D., Ladyman, J., & Kincaid, H. (2013). Scientific Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.

Rossberg, M. (2004). First-order logic, second-order logic, and completeness. In V. F. H. et al. (Ed.), First-Order Logic Revisited. Berlin: Logos-Verlag. http://logic.amu.edu.pl/images/4/46/Completenessrossberg.pdf

Roughgarden, T. (2016). Twenty Lectures on Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge University Press.

Rovelli, C. (2003). A dialog on quantum gravity. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0310077

———. (2007). Anaximander. Westholme.

Royall, R. (1997). Statistical Evidence: A likelihood paradigm. CRC Press.

Rozeboom, W. W. (1960). The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 416.

Rubbia, C. (1984). Experimental observation of the intermediate vector bosons W⁺, W⁻, and Z⁰. Nobel lecture, December 8, 1984. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/rubbia-lecture.pdf

Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688. https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/1975-06502-001.pdf

Ruetsche, L. (2002). Interpreting quantum field theory. Philosophy of Science, 69, 348–378.

———. (2018). Renormalization group realism: The ascent of pessimism. Philosophy of Science, 85, 1176–1189. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26627776

Ruja, H. (1957). Are naturalists materialists? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 17, 555–557.

———. (1961). The present status of the verifiability criterion. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 22, 216–222.

Rukeyser, M. (1976). Islands. In The Gates. McGraw-Hill. http://murielrukeyser.emuenglish.org/2018/12/07/islands/

Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323, 533–536. https://www.nature.com/articles/323533a0.pdf

Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14, 479–493. https://www.finophd.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/russell_on_denoting.pdf

———. (1908). Mathematical logic as based on the theory of types. American Journal of Mathematics, 30, 222–262. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2369948

———. (1912). The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford University Press. (with Introduction by John Perry 1997).

———. (1919). The philosophy of logical atomism: Lectures 7-8. The Monist, 29, 345–380. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27900748.pdf

———. (1943). The future of pacifism. The American Scholar, 13, 7–13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41204635

———. (1945). A History of Western Philosophy. Simon & Schuster.

———. (1989). Wisdom of the West. Crescent Books. (Originally published in 1959).

———. (1992). The Analysis of Matter. Routledge. (Originally published in 1927).

———. (2004a). History of Western Philosophy. Routledge. (Originally published in 1946).

———. (2004b). Sceptical Essays. Routledge. (Originally published in 1928).

———. (2004c). Why I Am Not a Christian. Routledge. (Originally published in 1927).

———. (2009). Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. Routledge. (Originally published in 1923).

Russell, G. (2008). Truth in Virtue of Meaning: A defence of the analytic/synthetic distinction. Oxford University Press.

———. (2015). The justification of the basic laws of logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 44, 793–803.

———. (2020). Logic isn’t normative. Inquiry, 63, 371–388.

———. (2021). How to prove Hume’s law. Journal of Philosophical Logic. (forthcoming).

———. (2023). Barriers to Entailment: Hume’s law & other limits on logical consequence. Oxford University Press.

Russell, S. & Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial Intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Pearson.

Rutt, R. (2002). The Book of Changes (Zhouyi). Routledge Curzon.

Ryan, J. A. (1996). Leibniz’ binary system and Shao Yong’s Yijing. Philosophy East and West, 46, 59.

Ryden, B. (2003). Introduction to Cosmology. Addison Wesley.

Sabra, A. I. (1978). An eleventh-century refutation of Ptolemy’s planetary theory. Studia Copernicana, 16, 117–131.

Sachs, C. B. (2011). What is to be Overcome? Nietzsche, Carnap, and modernism as the overcoming of metaphysics. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 28, 303–318. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23032343

Sadakata, A. (1997). Buddhist Cosmology: Philosophy and Origins. (G. Sekimori, Trans.). Tokyo: Kōsei Publishing.

Sagan, C. (1997). The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. London: Headline. (Originally published in 1995).

Salam, A. & Ward, J. C. (1964a). Electromagnetic and weak interactions. Physics Letters, 13, 168–171.

———. (1964b). Gauge theory of elementary interactions. Physical Review, 136, 763–768.

Salmon, W. C. (1953). The uniformity of nature. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 14, 39–48.

———. (1963). On vindicating induction. Philosophy of Science, 30, 252–261.

———. (1966). The Foundations of Scientific Inference. University of Pittsburgh Press.

———. (1967). Carnap’s inductive logic. The Journal of Philosophy, 64, 725–739.

———. (1991). Hans Reichenbach’s vindication of induction. Erkenntnis, 35, 99–122.

Salsburg, D. (2001). The Lady Tasting Tea. Holt.

Sandberg, A., Drexler, E., & Ord, T. (2018). Dissolving the Fermi paradox. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.02404

Sankey, H. (1997). Rationality, Relativism, and Incommensurability. Ashgate.

———. (2001). Scientific realism: An elaboration and a defence. Theoria, 98, 35–54.

———. (2008). Scientific Realism and the Rationality of Science. Ashgate.

———. (2015). Realism, progress, and the historical turn. Foundations of Science, 22, 201–214.

Sartre, J. P. (1964). Nausea. (L. Alexander, Trans.). New York: New Directions Publishing Co. (Originally published in 1938 as La Nausée).

———. (2007). Existentialism is a Humanism. (C. Macomber, Trans.). Yale University Press. (Originally published in 1948 as L’Existentialisme est un Humanisme).

Sartwell, C. (2015). Philosophy returns to the real world. New York Times. April 13, 2015. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/04/13/philosophy-returns-to-the-real-world/

Saunders, S. (2021). Branch-counting in the Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 477, 20210600. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2021.0600

Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. John Wiley & Sons.

Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Harvard University Press.

Scardapane, S. (2024). Alice’s Adventures in a Differentiable Wonderland, Vol. I: A Tour of the Land. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.17625

Schaeffer, R. et al. (2023). Double descent demystified: Identifying, interpreting & ablating the sources of a deep learning puzzle. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14151

Schlick, M. (1936). Meaning and verification. The Philosophical Review, 45, 339–369.

———. (1948). Positivism and realism. Synthese, 7, 478–505. (D. Rynin, Trans. Originally published in 1933 in Erkenntnis, 3.).

———. (1959). The turning point in philosophy. (D. Rynin, Trans. Originally published in 1933 as Die Wende Der Philosophie. Erkenntnis, 1, 4–11.). http://zolaist.org/wiki/images/7/79/The_Turning_Point_in_Philosophy.pdf

———. (1974). General Theory of Knowledge. (A. E. Blumberg, Trans.). Springer-Verlag. (Originally published in German in 1921 as Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre).

Schlingemann, D. (1998). From euclidean field theory to quantum field theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9802035

Schlosshauer, M. (2005). Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 76, 1267–1305. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0312059

Schlosshauer, M. & Fine, A. (2012). Implications of the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph quantum no-go theorem. Physical Review Letters, 108, 260404. https://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4779

Schmid, M. et al. (2019). Variance reduction in Monte Carlo counterfactual regret minimization (VR-MCCFR) for extensive form games using baselines. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/4048/3926

———. (2021). Player of games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.03178

Schönberg, M. (1954). On the hydrodynamical model of the quantum mechanics. Il Nuovo Cimento, 12, 103–133.

Schopenhauer, A. (2014a). Essays and Aphorisms. (R. J. Hollingdale, Trans.). Penguin.

———. (2014b). The World as Will and Representation, Vol. 1 and 2. (J. Norman, A. Welchman, & C. Janaway, Eds.). Cambridge University Press. (Originally published as Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, Vol. 1 in 1818, Vol. 2 in 1844).

———. (2015). On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason and Other Writings. (D. E. Cartwright, E. E. Erdmann, & C. Janaway, Eds.). Cambridge University Press. (Originally published as Schopenhauer’s doctoral dissertation in 1813).

Schreiber, U. (2016a). Higher prequantum geometry. https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05956

———. (2016b). Learn about supersymmetry and Deligne’s theorem. https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/supersymmetry-delignes-theorem/

———. (2020). Differential cohomology in a cohesive ∞-topos. https://ncatlab.org/schreiber/show/differential+cohomology+in+a+cohesive+topos

Schrödinger, E. (1935). Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 31, 555–563.

———. (1936). Probability relations between separated systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 32, 446–452.

———. (1944). What Is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. Cambridge University Press.

———. (1952a). Are there quantum jumps? Part I. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 3, 109–123. https://www.jstor.org/stable/685552

———. (1952b). Are there quantum jumps? Part II. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 3, 109–123. https://www.jstor.org/stable/685266

———. (1953). What is matter? Scientific American, 189, 52–57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24944334

Schroeren, D. (2021). Symmetry fundamentalism in quantum mechanics. Philosophical Studies. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11098-021-01634-z

Schuldenfrei, R. (1972). Quine in perspective. The Journal of Philosophy, 69, 5–16.

Schumacher, E. F. (1977). A Guide for the Perplexed. Harper & Row.

Schumm, B. A. (2004). Deep Down Things. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Schurz, G. (1997). The Is/Ought Problem: An Investigation in Philosophical Logic. Dortrecht: Kluwer.

———. (2010a). Comments on Restall, Russell, and Vranas. In C. Pigden (Ed.), Hume, Is and Ought: New Essays (pp. 268–271). Palgrave MacMillan.

———. (2010b). Non-trivial versions of Hume’s is-ought thesis. In C. Pigden (Ed.), Hume, Is and Ought: New Essays (pp. 198–216). Palgrave MacMillan.

———. (2019). Hume’s Problem Solved: The optimality of meta-induction. MIT Press.

Schwartz, M. D. (2014). Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. Cambridge University Press.

Schweber, S. S. (1961). An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Harper & Row.

———. (1993). The ebb and flow of of reductionism. In L. M. Brown (Ed.), Renormalization: From Lorentz to Landau (and Beyond) (pp. 155–166). Springer-Verlag.

Schwichtenberg, J. (2015). Physics from Symmetry. Springer.

Scruton, R. (2015). Scientism and the humanities. In R. N. Williams & D. N. Robinson (Eds.), Scientism: The New Orthodoxy (pp. 131–146). Bloomsbury.

———. (2018). Why beauty matters. The Monist, 101, 9–16.

Sebens, C. T. (2019). How electrons spin. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 68, 40–50. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.01121

Seidewitz, E. (2017). Avoiding Haag’s theorem with parameterized quantum field theory. Foundations of Physics, 47, 355–374. https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.05658

Seifert, V. A. (2024). The chemical bond is a real pattern. Philosophy of Science. https://philpapers.org/archive/SEITCB-2.pdf

Sellars, W. (1963a). Empiricism and philosophy of mind. In Science, Perception, and Reality (pp. 127–196). Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Co.

———. (1963b). Science, Perception, and Reality. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Co.

Sen, A. (1970). The impossibility of a Paretian Liberal. Journal of Political Economy, 78, 152–157. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/3612779/Sen_ImpossibilityParetian.pdf

———. (2009). The Idea of Justice. Harvard University Press.

Seneca. (1997). On the Shortness of Life. (C. D. N. Costa, Trans.). Penguin Books. (Originally written in 49 CE and titled De Brevitate Vitae).

Sextus Empiricus. (1933). Outlines of Pyrrhonism. (R. G. Bury, Trans.). London: W. Heinemann.

Shalev-Shwarz, S. & Ben-David, S. (2014). Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cs.huji.ac.il/w~shais/UnderstandingMachineLearning/understanding-machine-learning-theory-algorithms.pdf

Shapiro, S. (1991). Foundations without Foundationalism: A Case for Second-Order Logic. Oxford University Press.

———. (2000). Thinking about Mathematics: The Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford University Press.

Sheffer, H. M. (1913). A set of five independent postulates for Boolean algebras, with application to logical constants. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 14, 481–488. https://www.ams.org/journals/tran/1913-014-04/S0002-9947-1913-1500960-1/

Shifman, M. (2012). Advanced Topics in Quantum Field Theory: A lecture course. Cambridge University Press.

Shimony, A. (1984). Contextual hidden variables theories and Bell’s inequalities. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 35, 25–45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/687555

Sider, T. (2011). Writing the Book of the World. Oxford University Press.

———. (2022). Crash course on higher-order logic. https://tedsider.org/teaching/higher_order_20/higher_order_crash_course.pdf

Siderits & M. (2021). Buddhism As Philosophy (2nd ed.). Hackett.

Siegel, E. (2016). No, science is not faith-based. Medium.com. March 15, 2016. https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/no-science-is-not-faith-based-ddc9be25efba

Siegel, K. (2014). The ubiquity of ADE classifications in nature. https://kylersiegel.xyz/notes/ADEClassifications.pdf

Sigmund, K. (2017). Exact Thinking in Demented Times: The Vienna Circle and the epic quest for the foundations of science. Basic Books.

Silver, D. et al. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529, 484–489.

———. (2017a). Mastering chess and shogi by self-play with a general reinforcement learning algorithm. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.01815

———. (2017b). Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge. Nature, 550, 354–359.

Silver, D., Singh, S., Precup, D., & Sutton, R. S. (2024). Reward is enough. Artificial Intelligence, 299, 103535. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370221000862

Silvers, S. (1997). Nonreductive naturalism. Theoria, 12, 163–184. https://addi.ehu.es/bitstream/handle/10810/40244/Theoria%2028%20163-184.pdf

Simon, B. (1976). Quantum dynamics: From automorphism to Hamiltonian. In E. H. Lieb (Ed.), Studies in Mathematical Physics: Essays in Honor of Valentine Bargmann (pp. 327–350). Princeton University Press. http://www.math.caltech.edu/SimonPapers/R12.pdf

Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467–482.

Simonyan, K. & Zisserman, A. (2014). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556

Sinervo, P. (2002). Signal significance in particle physics. In M. R. Whalley & L. Lyons (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Advanced Statistical Techniques in Particle Physics. Durham, UK: Institute of Particle Physics Phenomenology. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0208005v1

———. (2003). Definition and treatment of systematic uncertainties in high energy physics and astrophysics. In Lyons L., Mount R., & R. Reitmeyer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Statistical Problems in Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology (PhyStat2003) (pp. 122–129). Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. https://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C030908/papers/TUAT004.pdf

Singh, S. P., Lucchi, A., Hofmann, T., & Schölkopf, B. (2022). Phenomenology of double descent in finite-width neural networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07337

Sivin, N. (1995). Why the scientific revolution did not take place in China—Or didn’t it? In N. Sivin (Ed.), Science in Ancient China. Aldershot, Hants: Variorum. http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~nsivin/scirev.pdf

Skarsaune, K. O. (2009). Darwin and moral realism: Survival of the iffiest. Philosophical Studies, 152, 229–243.

Skelac, I. & Jandric, A. (2020). Meaning as use: From Wittgenstein to Google’s Word2vec. In S. Skansi (Ed.), Guide To Deep Learning Basics: Logical, Historical And Philosophical Perspectives (pp. 41–53). Springer.

Slansky, R. (1981). Group theory for unified model building. Physics Reports, 79, 1–128. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.126.1581&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Slonim, N., Atwal, G. S., Tkacik, G., & Bialek, W. (2005). Information-based clustering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 18297–18302. https://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio/0511043

Smart, J. J. C. & Williams, B. (1973). Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge University Press. https://www.utilitarianism.com/utilitarianism-for-and-against.pdf

Smith, L. (2019). A gentle introduction to information geometry. September 27, 2019. http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~lsgs/posts/2019-09-27-info-geom.html

Smith, P. (2020). An Introduction to Formal Logic (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

———. (2022). Beginning Mathematical Logic: A Study Guide. https://www.logicmatters.net/resources/pdfs/LogicStudyGuide.pdf

Smith, R. J. (2012). How the Book of Changes Arrived in the West. New England Review, 33, 25–41. https://scholarship.rice.edu/bitstream/handle/1911/72082/Book-of-Changes.pdf

Snapper, E. (1979). The three crises in mathematics: Logicism, intuitionism and formalism. Mathematics Magazine, 52, 207–216. https://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/upload_library/22/Allendoerfer/1980/0025570x.di021111.02p0048m.pdf

Snow, C. P. (1959). The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. Oxford University Press.

Snyder-Hall, R. C. (2010). Third-wave feminism and the defense of "choice". Perspectives on Politics, 8, 255–261. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25698533

Sohl-Dickstein, J. (2020). Two equalities expressing the determinant of a matrix in terms of expectations over matrix-vector products. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.06553

Sokal, A. D. (1996a). A physicist experiments with cultural studies. http://www.physics.nyu.edu/sokal/lingua_franca_v4.pdf

———. (1996b). Transgressing the boundaries: Towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. http://www.physics.nyu.edu/sokal/transgress_v2_noafterword.pdf

Sokal, A. D. & Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science. Picador.

Solomonoff, G. (2016). Ray Solomonoff and the Dartmouth Summer Research Project in Artificial Intelligence, 1956. http://raysolomonoff.com/dartmouth/dartray.pdf

Solzhenitsyn, A. (1974). The Gulag Archipelago. (T. P. Whitney, Trans.). Harper & Row.

Sorell, T. (1991). Scientism: Philosophy and the Infatuation with Science. Routledge.

Southey, F. et al. (2012). Bayes’ bluff: Opponent modelling in poker. https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1411

Spears, B.K. et al. (2018). Deep learning: A guide for practitioners in the physical sciences. Physics of Plasmas, 25, 080901.

Spivak, D. I. (2013). Category theory for scientists. https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.6946

Spurrett, D. J. (1999). The Completeness of Physics. Durban: The University of Natal. (Ph.D. thesis). https://philpapers.org/rec/SPUTCO

Spurrett, D. J. & Papineau, D. (1999). A note on the completeness of ’physics’. Analysis, 59, 25–29. https://www.davidpapineau.co.uk/uploads/1/8/5/5/18551740/analysis-1999-spurrett-25-9.pdf

Stacey, B. C. (2014). Von Neumann was not a quantum Bayesian. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.2409

Stadler, F. (1998). Vienna Circle. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/vienna-circle/v-1.

———. (2015). The Vienna Circle: Studies in the origins, development, and influence of Logical Empiricism. Springer.

Stahlberg, F. (2019). Neural machine translation: A review. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02047

Stalnaker, R. C. (2003). Ways a World Might Be: Metaphysical and anti-metaphysical essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Stein, C. (1956). Inadmissibility of the usual estimator for the mean of a multivariate normal distribution. Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, 197–206.

Stein, H. (2021). Physics and philosophy meet: The strange case of Poincaré. Foundations of Physics, 51, 1–24.

Steinberger, F. (2016). How tolerant can you be? Carnap on rationality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 92, 645–668.

Steinhardt, J. (2012). Beyond Bayesians and frequentists. https://jsteinhardt.stat.berkeley.edu/files/stats-essay.pdf

———. (2022). More is different for AI. https://bounded-regret.ghost.io/more-is-different-for-ai/

Steinhardt, P. J. (1983). Natural inflation. In The Very Early Universe: Proc. Nuffield Workshop (pp. 251–66). Cambridge University Press.

Stillwell, J. (2004). Emil Post and his anticipation of Gödel and Turing. Mathematics Magazine, 77, 3–14.

Stopp, F., Ortiz-Gutiérrez, L., Lehec, H., & Schmidt-Kaler, F. (2021). Single ion thermal wave packet analyzed via time-of-flight detection. New Journal of Physics, 23, 063002. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/abffc0

Strawson, P. F. (1950). On referring. Mind, 59, 320–344.

Streater, R. & Wightman, A. (1964). PCT, spin and statistics, and all that. New York: Benjamin.

Stuart, A., Ord, K., & Arnold, S. (2010). Kendall’s Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol 2A: Classical Inference and the Linear Model. Wiley.

Sullivan, B. W. (2013). Everything You Always Wanted To Know About Mathematics. Carnegie Mellon University. (Ph.D. thesis). https://www.math.cmu.edu/~jmackey/151_128/bws_book.pdf

Summers, S. J. (1999). On the Stone-von Neumann uniqueness theorem and its ramifications. In John von Neumann and the Foundations of Quantum Physics (pp. 135–152). Budapest: Kluwer.

Sun, Y. et al. (2023). Retentive network: A successor to transformer for large language models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.08621

Suppe, F. (1974). The Structure of Scientific Theories. University of Illinois Press.

———. (2000). Understanding scientific theories: An assessment of developments, 1969-1998. Philosophy of Science, 67, 102–115.

Suppes, P. (1961). A comparison of the meaning and uses of models in mathematics and the empirical sciences. In The Concept and the Role of the Model in Mathematics and Natural and Social Sciences (pp. 163–177). Springer, Dordrecht.

———. (1967). What is a scientific theory? In S. Morgenbesser (Ed.), Philosophy of Science Today (pp. 55–67). Basic Books.

Sussman, G. J. & Wisdom, J. (2013). Functional Differential Geometry. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/functional-differential-geometry

Sutskever, I. (2015). A brief overview of deep learning. https://web.archive.org/web/20220728224752/http://yyue.blogspot.com/2015/01/a-brief-overview-of-deep-learning.html

Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014). Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2014, 3104–3112. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3215

Sutton, R. S. (2019). The bitter lesson. http://www.incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/BitterLesson.html

Sutton, R. S. & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement Learning (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

Swartz, N. (2003). The Concept of Physical Law (2nd ed.). http://www.sfu.ca/~swartz/physical-law/

———. (2009). Laws of nature. International Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/lawofnat/

Sznajder, M. (2018). Inductive logic as explication: The evolution of Carnap’s notion of logical probability. The Monist, 101, 417–440.

’t Hooft, G. (1971). Renormalizable Lagrangians for massive Yang-Mills fields. Nuclear Physics B, 35, 167–188.

———. (1978). Extended objects in gauge field theories. In D. H. Bod & A. N. Kamal (Eds.), Particles and Fields (pp. 165–198). New York: Plenum.

———. (1994). Under the Spell of the Gauge Principle. World Scientific.

———. (1999). A confrontation with infinity. Nobel Lecture, December 8, 1999. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1999/thooft/lecture/

———. (2005). The conceptual basis of quantum field theory. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/22670/hooft_05_conceptualbasisofquantumfieldtheory.pdf

———. (2007). Lie groups in physics. http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~hooft101/lectures/lieg07.pdf

———. (2014). The cellular automaton interpretation of quantum mechanics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.1548

———. (2021). An unorthodox view on quantum mechanics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.03179

Tahko, T. E. (2022). Natural kinds, mind-independence, and unification principles. Synthese, 200, 144. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-022-03661-7

Tait, W. W. (1983). Against intuitionism: Constructive mathematics is part of classical mathematics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 12, 173–195.

Takagi, Y. & Nishimoto, S. (2022). High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activity. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.18.517004

Tammelin, O. (2014). Solving large imperfect information games using CFR+. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5042

Tammelin, O., Burch, N., Johanson, M., & Bowling, M. (2015). Solving heads-up limit texas hold’em. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 24. http://johanson.ca/publications/poker/2015-ijcai-cfrplus/2015-ijcai-cfrplus.pdf

Tan, M. & Le, Q. V. (2019). EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11946

———. (2021). EfficientNetV2: Smaller models and faster training. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.00298

Tao, T. (2007). Differential forms and integration. https://www.math.ucla.edu/~tao/preprints/forms.pdf

Tarski, A. (1969). Truth and proof. Scientific American, 220, 63–77. https://web.archive.org/web/20141229081319/http://people.scs.carleton.ca/~bertossi/logic/material/tarski.pdf

———. (1983). The concept of truth in formalized languages. In J. Corcoran (Ed.), Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Hackett. (Originally published in 1936 in German.). http://www.thatmarcusfamily.org/philosophy/Course_Websites/Readings/Tarski%20-%20The%20Concept%20of%20Truth%20in%20Formalized%20Languages.pdf

Tartaglia, J. (2016). Philosophy in a Meaningless Life. Bloomsbury Academic.

Tay, Y., Dehghani, M., Bahri, D., & Metzler, D. (2022). Efficient transformers: A survey. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.06732

Tegmark, M. (1993). Apparent wave function collapse caused by scattering. Foundations of Physics Letters, 6, 571–590. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9310032

———. (2008). The mathematical universe. Foundations of Physics, 38, 101–150. https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0646

———. (2014). Our Mathematical Universe. Knopf.

Tegmark, M., Taylor, A. N., & Heavens, A. F. (1997). Karhunen-Loeve eigenvalue problems in cosmology: How should we tackle large data sets? The Astrophysical Journal, 480, 22–35. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9603021

Teller, P. (1989). A Modern Formal Logic Primer. Prentice Hall. https://tellerprimer.ucdavis.edu/

———. (1997). An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Princeton University Press.

———. (2000). The gauge argument. Philosophy of Science, 67, 466–481.

Tenney, I. et al. (2019). What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.06316

Thomas, B. (2015). A disease of scienceyness. Medium.com. March 4, 2015. https://medium.com/%40writingben/a-disease-of-scienceyness-7b5571a34953

Thomson, J. J. (1971). A defense of abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1, 47–66.

Thuerey, N. et al. (2021). Physics-based deep learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.05237

Timbers, F. (2020). Approximate exploitability: Learning a best response in large games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.09677

Todorov, I. (2012). Quantization is a mystery. https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3116

Tollefsen, D. (1999). Princess Elisabeth and the problem of mind-body interaction. Hypatia, 14, 59–77.

Tong, D. (2006). Lectures on Quantum Field Theory. https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/qft.html

———. (2022). Lectures on Supersymmetric Field Theory. https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/susy.html

Tononi, G. (2004). An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neuroscience, 5, 1–22. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-2202-5-42

———. (2010). Information integration: Its relevance to brain function and consciousness. Archives Italiennes de Biolaogie, 148, 299–322. http://www.architalbiol.org/index.php/aib/article/view/148299

Tononi, G. & Edelman, G. M. (1998). Consciousness and complexity. Science, 282, 1846–1851.

Torretti, R. (1999). The Philosophy of Physics. Cambridge University Press.

Tu, L. W. (2017). Differential Geometry: Connections, Curvature, and Characteristic Classes. Springer.

Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Pearson.

Tumulka, R. (2017). Bohmian mechanics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.08017

Turing, A. M. (1937). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 42, 230–65.

Udrescu, S. & Tegmark, M. (2020). Symbolic pregression: Discovering physical laws from raw distorted video. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11212

Urban, T. (2015). The AI Revolution: The Road to Superintelligence. https://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html

Vákár, M. (2011). Principal bundles and gauge theories. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06334

van Fraassen, B. (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press.

———. (2002). The Empirical Stance. Yale University Press.

van Handel, R. (2016). Probability in high dimensions. Lecture notes at Princeton. https://web.math.princeton.edu/~rvan/APC550.pdf

van Hove, L. (1958). Von Neumann’s contributions to quantum theory. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 64, 95–100. https://projecteuclid.org/journals/bulletin-of-the-american-mathematical-society-new-series/volume-64/issue-3.P2/Von-Neumanns-contributions-to-quantum-theory/bams/1183522374.full

van Inwagen, P. (2014). Metaphysics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaphysics/

van Nieuwenhuizen, P. (1981). Supergravity. Physics Reports, 68, 189–398.

Van Norden, B. W. (2017). Taking Back Philosophy: A Multicultural Manifesto. Columbia University Press.

Vapnik, V., Levin, E., & LeCun, Y. (1994). Measuring the VC-dimension of a learning machine. Neural Computation, 6, 851–876.

Varadarajan, V. S. (2003). Vector bundles and connections in physics and mathematics: some historical remarks. In A Tribute to CS Seshadri (pp. 502–541). Gurgaon: Hindustan Book Agency.

Vaswani, A. et al. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, 5998–6008. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762

Venn, J. (1888). The Logic of Chance. London: MacMillan and Co. (Originally published in 1866).

Ver Hoef, J. M. (2012). Who invented the delta method? American Statistician, 66, 124–127. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23339471

Verhaegh, S. (2019). The American reception of logical positivism: First encounters (1929-1932). HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 10, 106–142.

———. (2020). Coming to America: Carnap, Reichenbach and the great intellectual migration. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy, 8, 1–47. https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/4364

Vershynin, R. (2018). High-Dimensional Probability: An Introduction with Applications in Data Science. Cambridge University Press. https://www.math.uci.edu/~rvershyn/papers/HDP-book/HDP-book.pdf

Vickers, J. (2014). The problem of induction. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/sum2016/entries/induction-problem/

Vincent, J. (2019). OpenAI’s new multitalented AI writes, translates, and slanders: A step forward in AI text-generation that also spells trouble. https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/14/18224704/ai-machine-learning-language-models-read-write-openai-gpt2

Vinge, V. (1993). The coming technological singularity. https://edoras.sdsu.edu/~vinge/misc/singularity.html

Vitagliano, E., Tamborra, I., & Raffelt, G. (2020). Grand unified neutrino spectrum at Earth: Sources and spectral components. Reviews of Modern Physics, 92, 045006. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.11878

Viteri, S. & DeDeo, S. (2022). Epistemic phase transitions in mathematical proofs. Cognition, 225, 105120. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027722001081

von Fintel, K. (2011). Conditionals. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/95781

von Neumann, J. (1955). The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. (R. T. Beyer, Trans.). Princeton University Press. (Originally published in German in 1932).

Vrahimis, A. (2013). Was there a sun before men existed?: A.J. Ayer and French philosophy in the fifties. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy, 1. https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/12

———. (2020). Scientism, social praxis, and overcoming metaphysics: A debate between logical empiricism and the Frankfurt School. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 10, 562–597. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/710184

Wagenmakers, E. J. (2021). Review: Bernoulli’s Fallacy. Chance, 34, 37–38. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09332480.2021.2003642

Wagner, P. (2009). Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave Macmillan.

Wainer, H. (2007). The most dangerous equation. American Scientist, 95, 249–256. https://sites.stat.washington.edu/people/peter/498.Sp16/Equation.pdf

Wakefield, J. (2013). Bayesian and Frequentist Regression Methods. Springer.

Wald, A. (1943). Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 54, 426–482. https://www.ams.org/journals/tran/1943-054-03/S0002-9947-1943-0012401-3/S0002-9947-1943-0012401-3.pdf

Wall, C. T. C. (1964). Graded Brauer groups. Journal für Die Reine Und Angewandte Mathematik, 213, 187–199.

Wallace, D. (2011). Taking particle physics seriously: A critique of the algebraic approach to quantum field theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 42, 116–125.

———. (2012). The Emergent Multiverse. Oxford University Press.

———. (2013). Inferential vs dynamical conceptions of physics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.4907

———. (2014). Deflating the Aharonov-Bohm effect. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5073

———. (2016). What is orthodox quantum mechanics? https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.05973

———. (2018). Decoherence and its role in the modern measurement problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.2187

———. (2020). Lessons from realistic physics for the metaphysics of quantum theory. Synthese, 197, 4303–4318. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-018-1706-y

———. (2022). The sky is blue, and other reasons quantum mechanics is not underdetermined by evidence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.00568

Wang, H. et al. (2023). BitNet: Scaling 1-bit transformers for large language models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11453

Warren, J. (2016a). Internal and external questions revisited. The Journal of Philosophy, 113, 177–209.

———. (2016b). Revisiting Quine on truth by convention. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 46, 119–139.

———. (2016c). Sider on the epistemology of structure. Philosophical Studies, 173, 2417–2435.

Wasserman, L. (2003). All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference. Springer.

Wasserstein, R. L., Allen, L. S., & Lazar, N. A. (2019). Moving to a World Beyond "p<0.05". American Statistician, 73, 1–19.

Wasserstein, R. L. & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA’s statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. American Statistician, 70, 129–133.

Watson, D. & Floridi, L. (2019). The explanation game: A formal framework for interpretable machine learning. SSRN, 3509737. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3509737

Way, R. (2010). Introduction to connections on principal fibre bundles. http://personal.maths.surrey.ac.uk/T.Bridges/GEOMETRIC-PHASE/Connections_intro.pdf

Weatherson, B. (2017). Analytic-synthetic and a priori-a posteriori. In G. Cappelen H. & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology (pp. 231–248). Oxford University Press.

Wedgwood, R. (2007). The Nature of Normativity. Oxford University Press.

Weinberg, S. (1964a). Feynman rules for any spin II: Massless particles. Physical Review, 134, B882.

———. (1964b). Feynman rules for any spin. Physical Review, 133, B1318.

———. (1967). A model of leptons. Physical Review Letters, 19, 1264–1266. https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1264

———. (1977). The First Three Minutes. Basic Books.

———. (1979). Conceptual foundations of the unified theory of weak and electromagnetic interactions. Nobel lecture, December 8, 1979. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/weinberg-lecture.pdf

———. (1995). The Quantum Theory of Fields: Volume 1 Foundations. Cambridge University Press.

———. (1996). Sokal’s Hoax. The New York Review of Books, 43, 11–15. August 8, 1996. http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/weinberg.html

———. (1997a). What is an elementary particle? Beam Line, 27, 17–21. https://www.slac.stanford.edu/pubs/beamline/27/1/27-1-weinberg.pdf

———. (1997b). What is quantum field theory, and what did we think it is? Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Field Theory: Proceedings, Symposium and Workshop, Boston, USA, March 1-3, 1996. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9702027

———. (2015). To Explain The World: The discovery of modern science. Harper.

Weintraub, R. (1995). What was Hume’s contribution to the problem of induction? The Philosophical Quarterly, 45, 460–470.

Weisberg, J. (2019). Odds & Ends: Introducing Probability & Decision with a Visual Emphasis. https://jonathanweisberg.org/vip/

Weiss, W. & D’Mello, C. (2015). Fundamentals of Model Theory. https://www.math.toronto.edu/weiss/model_theory.pdf

Wells, S. (2013). Skeptic’s Annotated Bible. SAB Books. https://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/

Werbos, P. J. (1990). Backpropagation through time: what it does and how to do it. Proceedings of the IEEE, 78, 1550–1560. http://www.werbos.com/Neural/BTT.pdf

Westbury, B. W. (2010). Hurwitz’ theorem on composition algebras. https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.6197

Weyl, H. (1918). Raum, Zeit, Materie.

———. (1929). Elektron und gravitation. Zeitschrift für Physik, 56, 330–352.

———. (2009). Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science. Princeton University Press. (Originally published in German in 1927).

Wheeler, J. A. (1957). Assessment of Everett’s "relative state" formulation of quantum theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 29, 46–465.

Whetsell, T. A. & Shields, P. M. (2013). The dynamics of positivism in the study of public administration: A brief intellectual history and reappraisal. Administration & Society, 47, 416–446.

Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and Reality. New York: The Free Press.

Wigner, E. P. (1939). On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group. Annals of Mathematics, 40, 149–204.

———. (1954). Conservation laws in classical and quantum physics. Progress of Theoretical Physics, 11, 437–440. https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article/11/4-5/437/1831457

———. (1959). Group Theory and its Application to the Quantum Mechanics of Atomic Spectra. Academic Press. (Originally published in German in 1931).

———. (1960). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13, 1–14. Richard courant lecture in mathematical sciences delivered at New York University, May 11, 1959. http://www.dartmouth.edu/~matc/MathDrama/reading/Wigner.html

———. (1961). Remarks on the mind-body question. In I. J. Good (Ed.), The Scientist Speculates: An Anthology of Partly-Baked Ideas. London: Heinemann.

Wilhelm, I. (2022). Centering the Everett interpretation. https://philpapers.org/rec/WILCTE-4

Wilks, S. S. (1938). The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 9, 60–62. https://projecteuclid.org/journals/annals-of-mathematical-statistics/volume-9/issue-1/The-Large-Sample-Distribution-of-the-Likelihood-Ratio-for-Testing/10.1214/aoms/1177732360.full

Williams, C. (2017). Has Trump stolen philosophy’s critical tools? The New York Times. April 17, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/17/opinion/has-trump-stolen-philosophys-critical-tools.html

Williams, P. (2009). Mahayana Buddhism: The doctrinal foundations (2nd ed.). Routledge.

———. (2011). On converting from Buddhism to Catholicism: One convert’s story. http://whyimcatholic.com/index.php/conversion-stories/buddhist-converts/65-buddhist-convert-paul-williams

———. (2019). Scientific realism made effective. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70, 209–237. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1093/bjps/axx043

Williamson, J. (2009). The philosophy of science and its relation to machine learning. In Scientific Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (pp. 77–89). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. Vintage.

Wilson, K. G. (1974). The renormalization group and the ε expansion. Physics Reports, 12, 75–199.

———. (1979). Problems in physics with many scales of length. Scientific American, 241, 158–179. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24965270

Winburn, A. P. & Clemmons, C. M. J. (2021). Objectivity is a myth that harms the practice and diversity of forensic science. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 3, 100196. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X21000668

Witten, E. (1989). Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial. Communications Mathematical Physics, 121, 351–399. https://projecteuclid.org/journals/communications-in-mathematical-physics/volume-121/issue-3/Quantum-field-theory-and-the-Jones-polynomial/cmp/1104178138.full

———. (1998). Anti-de Sitter space and holography. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 2, 253–291. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9802150

Wittgenstein, L. (1929). Some remarks on logical form. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volumes, 9, 162–171. https://academic.oup.com/aristoteliansupp/article/9/1/162/1779966

———. (1961). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. (D. F. Pears & B. F. McGuinness, Trans.). Routledge. (Originally published in 1922). https://people.umass.edu/klement/tlp/tlp.html

———. (1969). On Certainty. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

———. (2009). Philosophical Investigations. (E. Anscombe & P. Hacker, Trans., P. Hacker & J. Schulte, Eds.) (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. (Originally published in 1953).

Wolfram, S. (2023). What is ChatGPT doing—and why does it work? https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/02/what-is-chatgpt-doing-and-why-does-it-work/

Wolpert, D. H. (1996). The lack of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms. Neural Computation, 8, 1341–1390.

———. (2007). Physical limits of inference. https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.1362

———. (2023). The implications of the no-free-lunch theorems for meta-induction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 54, 421–432. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10838-022-09609-2

Wolpert, D. H. & Kinney, D. (2020). Noisy deductive reasoning: How humans construct math, and how math constructs universes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.08298

Wolpert, D. H. & Macready, W. G. (1995). No free lunch theorems for search. Technical Report SFI-TR-95-02-010, Santa Fe Institute.

———. (1997). No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1, 67–82.

Wong, M. L. & Bartlett, S. (2022). Asymptotic burnout and homeostatic awakening: A possible solution to the Fermi paradox? Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 19, 20220029. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsif.2022.0029

Worrall, J. (1989). Structural realism: The best of both worlds? Dialectica, 43, 99–124.

Wray, K. B. (2018). Resisting Scientific Realism. Cambridge University Press.

Wright, R. (2017). Why Buddhism is True: The Science and Philosophy of Meditation and Enlightenment. Simon & Schuster.

Wu, J. (2021). Explaining universality: infinite limit systems in the renormalization group method. Synthese, 199, 14897–14930. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-021-03448-2

Wu, T. T. & Yang, C. N. (1975). Concept of nonintegrable phase factors and global formulation of gauge fields. Physical Review D, 12, 3845–3857.

Wu, Y. et al. (2016). Google’s neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.0473

Wuthrich, C. (2014). Putnam looks at quantum mechanics (again and again). https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5737

Xu, Z., Hasselt, H. van, & Silver, D. (2018). Meta-gradient reinforcement learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.09801

Yablo, S. & Gallois, A. (1998). Does ontology rest on a mistake? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 72, 229–262.

Yang, C. N. (1996). Symmetry and physics. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 140, 267–288. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/987310.pdf

Yang, C. N. & Mills, R. L. (1954). Conservation of isotopic spin and isotopic gauge invariance. Physical Review, 96, 191–195.

Yang, T. & Suzuki, J. (2023). Dropout drops double descent. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16179

Yang, Z. et al. (2019). XLNet: Generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding. https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.08237

Yock, P. (2018). Newton’s hypotheses on the structure of matter. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.05486

Zaheer, M. et al. (2020). Big Bird: Transformers for longer sequences. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.14062

Zalta, E. N. (1983). Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics. Dordrecht: Reidel. https://mally.stanford.edu/abstract-objects.pdf

———. (2000). Neo-logicism? An ontological reduction of mathematics to metaphysics. Erkenntnis, 53, 219–265. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20013013

———. (2007). Reflections on mathematics. In V. F. Hendricks & H. Leitgeb (Eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics: 5 Questions (pp. 313–328). New York: Automatic Press. https://mally.stanford.edu/Papers/reflections.pdf

———. (2011). Logic and metaphysics. Logic and Philosophy Today, 2, 153–172. https://mally.stanford.edu/Papers/logic-metaphysics.pdf

———. (2025). Principia Logico-Metaphysica. (Draft May 16, 2025). https://mally.stanford.edu/principia.pdf

Zapata-Carratala, C. (2021). Dimensioned algebra: The mathematics of physical quantities. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.08703

Zech, G. (1995). Comparing statistical data to Monte Carlo simulation: Parameter fitting and unfolding. (DESY-95-113). Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY). https://cds.cern.ch/record/284321

Zee, A. (2003). Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell. Princeton University Press.

———. (2016). Group Theory in a Nutshell for Physicists. Princeton University Press.

Zeidler, E. (2007). Quantum Field Theory I: Basics in mathematics and physics, Vol. 1. Springer.

———. (2008). Quantum Field Theory II: Quantum electrodynamics, Vol. 2. Springer.

———. (2011). Quantum Field Theory III: Gauge theory, Vol. 3. Springer.

Zhang, D. et al. (2021). The AI Index 2021 Annual Report. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, Stanford University. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.06312

———. (2022). The AI Index 2022 Annual Report. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, Stanford University. https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/2022-AI-Index-Report_Master.pdf

Zhang, T. (2023). Critical realism: A critical evaluation. Social Epistemology, 37, 15–29. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02691728.2022.2080127

Zhang, W. (1998). Complete anytime beam search. AAAI Proceedings, 98, 425–430. https://cdn.aaai.org/AAAI/1998/AAAI98-060.pdf

Zhao, J. et al. (2024). GaLore: Memory-efficient LLM training by gradient low-rank projection. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03507

Zhao, W.X. et al. (2023). A survey of large language models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.18223

Zhao, Y. et al. (2023). DETRs beat YOLOs on real-time object detection. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08069

Zhou, R. & Hansen, E. A. (2005). Beam-stack search: Integrating backtracking with beam search. ICAPS, 15, 90–98. https://cdn.aaai.org/ICAPS/2005/ICAPS05-010.pdf

Zinkevich, M., Johanson, M., Bowling, M., & Piccione, C. (2007). Regret minimization in games with incomplete information. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 20, 1729–1736. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2007/file/08d98638c6fcd194a4b1e6992063e944-Paper.pdf

Zumbrunnen, J. (2002). "Courage in the face of reality": Nietzsche’s admiration for Thucydides. Polity, 35, 237–263.

Zurek, W. H. (1991). Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical. Physics Today, 44, 36. https://www.unicamp.br/~chibeni/textosdidaticos/zurek-1991.pdf

———. (2001). Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75, 715–775. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0105127

———. (2003). Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical–Revisited. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0306072

———. (2022). Quantum theory of the classical: Einselection, envariance, quantum Darwinism and extantons. https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.09019

Zyla, P.A. et al. (Particle Data Group). (2021). Review of Particle Physics. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2020, 083C01. (and 2021 update). https://pdg.lbl.gov/2021/reviews/contents_sports.html