Participants introduce themselves

Day 1, morning, 1st session

  1. Nicholas Pritzker - Investor worth $1.3 B, sponsored the event.

  2. Sean Carroll - Conference organizer. Physicist/cosmologist at Cal Tech. Philosophy minor; philosophy grad courses with John Rawls and Robert Nozick. Wishes he had written a book about atheism. Disagrees with Sam Harris that morality can be based on science.1 Compatibilist, but curious about free will.

    Sean’s books include a textbook on general relativity: Spacetime and Geometry, and popular books: From Eternity to Here and The Particle at the End of the Universe.2

    Sean blogs at preposterousuniverse.com

  3. Richard Dawkins - Oxford biologist. If not naturalism then what? Super-human is surely possible, but what would supernatural even mean?

    Richard’s books include The Selfish Gene, The Blind Watchmaker, and The God Delusion.3

  4. Don Ross - Ph.D. philosophy of science. Works in both philosophy and economics. Interested in the unification of economics with other sciences. Economics as the study of information systems.

    Wrote Every Thing Must Go with James Ladyman as a critical polemic against metaphysics with pre-scientific views.

    Philosophers, for the most part, analytic philosophers particularly, have failed to really promote naturalism and give it its proper innings because of lingering commitments to pre-scientific worldviews.

    David Lewis, for example, does not take contemporary physics seriously.

    [Analytic metaphysics,] as practiced in the world’s best philosophy departments right now, it’s virtually all nonsense. It virtually all presupposes demonstrably false physics.

    QFT is inconsistent with the presuppositions of most analytic metaphysics. What if we take real physics seriously? What about the special sciences? Science should provide us with a general worldview.

    Runs an experimental economics lab at the U of Capetown. Would like to change his mind about the philosophy of mathematics since he changes it often.

    Don’s books include Dennett’s Philosophy: A Comprehensive Assessment, Economic Theory and Cognitive Science: Microexplanation, Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized, and What Is Addiction?.5

  5. Alex Rosenberg - Started in physics. Works in the philosophy of biology. Views that naturalism is deeply incompatible with Sellars’ manifest image (the obvious furniture of reality in contrast to the scientific image). Wrote *The Atheist Guide to Reality for which others in the room call him a “maddog reductionist”.

    Alex’s books include Philosophy of Biology: A Contemporary Introduction, Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction, and The Atheist’s Guide to Reality.7

  6. Owen Flanagan - Philosopher. Embraces Sellars’ view that

    The aim of philosophy, abstractly formulated, is to understand how things in the broadest possible sense of the term hang together in the broadest possible sense of the term.8

    Grew up Catholic. Studied with Quine and some of his students. The best philosophy is continuous with science. Interested in consciousness and ethics. Disturbed by the way philosophers moan about the “hard problem”. Wrote Varieties of Moral Personality - Ethics and Psychological Realism. Believes that ethics can be naturalized. Morality is just a social institution. You can’t derive is from ought, but you can make inferences to the best explanation about what you ought to do, and there are often competing goods. Tries to combat the issue that most Americans have trouble finding meaning in a naturalistic worldview. Also studies classical Chinese and Indian philosophy. Free will is a black hole in philosophy that other cultures avoid discussing. Also interested in positive illusions - are false beliefs always bad?

    Owen’s books include Varieties of Moral Personality: Ethics and Psychological Realism, Consciousness Reconsidered, The Really Hard Problem: Meaning in a Material World, and The Bodhisattva’s Brain: Buddhism Naturalized.9

  7. Simon DeDeo - Started in cosmology at U Chicago. Studied with Hilary Putnam. Studies complexity theory at the Sante Fe Inst. Self-described platonist, functionalist. Studies social systems with group theory.

    Simon doesn’t have a book, but like others here, he has published several articles in peer-reviewed journals.10

  8. Terrence Deacon - Began college in physics. Got interested cybernetics. Co-authored a 900 page book on the Apple-II computer. Charles Pierce’s work made him drop-out of physics and write a philosophy thesis on Pierce. Interested in neuroscience and biological anthropology. Tracer techniques in neuroscience. Worked in cross-species neuron transplantation. Anti-theist but engages the Templeton Foundation. Interested in rethinking the concept of information. How do we get reference and normativity? How does a molecule become about something? Does not think that brains are like computers. Is still a functionalist, but thinks our theories of computation are not adequate to explain brains.

    Terrence’s books include The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain and Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter.11

  9. Rebecca Goldstein - Grew up in an orthodox Jewish home. As a child, read Our Friend the Atom and Bertrand Russell’s Why I am not a Christian.12 Wanted to be a physicist. Sydney Morganbesser convinced her to study philosophy of science. Went to Princeton to study philosophy. Wanted to study foundations of quantum mechanics. Then read Thomas Nagel’s “What it is like to be a bat”.13 She is a materialist but fascinated by the mind-body problem. Was driven to write philosophical novels out of frustration of philosophy’s dependence on character, intuitions, and presuppositions. Thinks she ruined her philosophy career with her first novel Mind-body Problem. Fascinated by philosophy of mathematics. Thinks Godel’s work leads to mathematical realism. Would like to believe that philosophy can make progress past people’s intuitions, but isn’t yet convinced.

    Rebecca’s books include: The Mind Body Problem, Incompleteness: The Proof and Paradox of Kurt Gödel, and Betraying Spinoza: The Renegade Jew Who Gave Us Modernity.14

  10. Daniel Dennett - Philosopher at Tuft’s. Quine was his hero and mentor. Didn’t study any science originally, but realized he needed to know something about the brain. Studied with Gilbert Ryle. Got informal education from many scientists. Doesn’t spend much time with many philosophers these days.

    I think this is a wonderfully chosen group. When I think of all the people in the field of philosophy that aren’t here, I am so glad they are not.

    Like Owen he is appalled that despite the progress naturalism has made in the last few decades, there is a retrograde gang of philosophers that do armchair philosophy that is not worth a damn. Willfred Sellars nailed it: philosophy should be about helping our intuitions understand how the manifest image goes with the scientific image, to bring consilience. Compatiblist. Thinks the brain should be thought of as having humuncular functionalism.

    The brain is a largely anarchic assemblage of selfish neurons that have agendas.

    Concerning the manifest/scientific image, in one sense there is no color, but if you call the front desk and say there is no color TV in your hotel room, they will know what you mean.

    Dan’s books include Consciousness Explained, Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life, Freedom Evolves, and Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon.15


Day 1, morning, 2nd session

  1. Massimo Pigliucci - Started as an evolutionary biologist, studying gene-environment interactions, nature/nurture. Midlife crisis lead him to move to NYC and get a second Ph.D. in philosophy. Became a philosophy professor at CUNY thanks to a letter of support from Daniel Dennett. Science and philosophy do different things, but are both part of scientia. Interested in the demarcation problem. Thinks that philosophy does make progress. Has a tattoo:

    Truth springs from argument amongst friends. – Hume (misattributed)

    Likes Ladyman and Ross’ book, Every Thing Must Go, which changed his mind about many things.

    Massimo’s books include: Tales of the Rational, Denying Evolution: Creationism, Scientism, and the Nature of Science, Making Sense of Evolution, and Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk.16

  2. David Poeppel - Undergrad in cell biology and linguistics. Then worked as an actor before going to grad school. Runs a human brain science lab at NYU, studying the temporal structural of perceptual experience. The parts list of the brain. Thinks neuroscience has generally failed so far. So far neuroscience has been successful at the “maps problem” making finer resolution maps of the brain, but not yet many conceptual advances.

    David doesn’t have a book, but like others here, he has published several articles in peer-reviewed journals.17

  3. Jennifer Ouellette - Science writer. Recoiled from an evangelical religious family. Married to Sean Carroll.

    Jennifer blogs at twistedphysics.typepad.com

  4. Jerry Coyne - Evolutionary biologist at U Chicago. Incompatiblist: consciousness and free will are an illusion, not meaning that they aren’t real, but they are not what they seem to be. Realized that to teach evolution it was necessary to argue against religion.

    We are collations of molecules that obey the laws of physics, and sometimes it appears that we do that rationally, but a lot of times we don’t. My replacement for free will would be the statement: Our decisions are made by internal forces that we don’t understand, and that we should deep-six the idea of free will in terms of this statement.

    Are there other ways to know besides science (art, music, literature)? For example, if your kid tells you they are hungry, that’s a way of knowing that is not science.

    (Ryan, the author of these notes): When your kid says something, it’s still scientific insofar as it’s a rough mix of being empirical/verifiable/falsifiable. You could ask your kid to repeat in case you mis-heard them; you could look closely to verify you aren’t mis-identifying them; you can verify (insofar as you get accurate feedback from the kid) that their hunger subsides after feeding them; empirically improving your confidence in the information.

    Jerry’s books include Speciation and Why Evolution Is True.18

    Jerry blogs at whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com

  5. Steven Weinberg - Works in particle physics, QFT, and cosmology. One of the founders of the Standard Model.19 Serious BAMF. Nobel laureate in physics in 1979 for his contributions with Abdus Salam and Sheldon Glashow to the unification of the weak and electromagnetic forces.

    Reality and naturalism:

    I’m all for them, but I’m not sure what they are.

    Consciousness and mathematics:

    I think I know what they are, but I don’t see how they fit into natural science.

    Confesses he has strong views on emergence, morality, and free will that are unlikely to change.

    Steven’s books include textbooks: The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol 1-3 and Cosmology, and popular books: The First Three Minutes and Dreams of a Final Theory.20

  6. Janna Levin - (Introduced herself later in the day 1, afternoon, 1st session.) TODO.21

References

Carroll, S. (2003). Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity. Pearson.

———. (2010). From Eternity to Here: The Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time. Dutton.

———. (2012). The Particle at the End of the Universe: How the Hunt for the Higgs Boson Leads Us to the Edge of a New World. Penguin.

Coyne, J. (2004). Speciation. Sinauer.

———. (2009). Why Evolution Is True. Viking.

Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.

———. (1986). The Blind Watchmaker. Norton.

———. (2006). The God Delusion. Houghton Mifflin.

Deacon, T. (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. Norton.

———. (2011). Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter. Norton.

DeDeo, S. (2010). Inductive game theory and the dynamics of animal conflict. PLOS Computational Biology, 6, 1000782. https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.5469

———. (2011). Effective theories for circuits and automata. Chaos, 21, 037106. https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.5778

Dennett, D. C. (1992). Consciousness Explained. Back Bay Books.

———. (1995). Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. Simon & Schuster.

———. (2003). Freedom Evolves. Viking.

———. (2006). Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. Penguin.

Flanagan, O. (1991). Varieties of Moral Personality: Ethics and Psychological Realism. Harvard University Press.

———. (1992). Consciousness Reconsidered. MIT Press.

———. (2007). The Really Hard Problem: Meaning in a Material World. MIT Press.

———. (2011). The Bodhisattva’s Brain: Buddhism Naturalized. MIT Press.

Goldstein, R. (1983). The Mind-Body Problem. Penguin.

———. (2005). Incompleteness: The Proof and Paradox of Kurt Gödel. Norton.

———. (2006). Betraying Spinoza: The Renegade Jew Who Gave Us Modernity. Random House.

———. (2015). Plato at the Googleplex: Why Philosophy Won’t Go Away. Vintage Books.

Harris, S. (2010). The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values. Free Press.

Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 393–402.

Ladyman, J., Ross, D., Spurrett, D., & Collier, J. (2007). Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalised. Oxford University Press.

Lau, E., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 920–933.

Levin, J. (2002). How the Universe Got Its Spots. Anchor.

———. (2006). A Madman Dreams of Turing Machines. Anchor.

Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450.

Pigliucci, M. (2000). Tales of the Rational. Freethought Press.

———. (2002). Denying Evolution: Creationism, Scientism, and the Nature of Science. Sinauer.

———. (2006). Making Sense of Evolution. University of Chicago Press.

———. (2010). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk. Chicago University Press.

———. (2017). How to Be a Stoic: Using Ancient Philosophy to Live a Modern Life. Basic Books.

Rosenberg, A. (2008). Philosophy of Biology: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge.

———. (2011). The Atheist’s Guide to Reality. Norton.

———. (2012). Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge.

Ross, D. (2000). Dennett’s Philosophy: A Comprehensive Assessment. MIT Press.

———. (2005). Economic Theory and Cognitive Science: Microexplanation. MIT Press.

———. (2010). What Is Addiction? MIT Press.

Ross, D., Ladyman, J., & Kincaid, H. (2013). Scientific Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.

Russell, B. (1957). Why I Am Not a Christian and Other Essays. George Allen & Unwin. (Originally published in 1927).

Sellars, W. (1963). Science, Perception, and Reality. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Co.

Weinberg, S. (1967). A model of leptons. Physical Review Letters, 19, 1264–1266.

———. (1977). The First Three Minutes. Basic Books.

———. (1992). Dreams of a Final Theory. Vintage Books.

———. (1995a). The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol 1: Foundations. Cambridge University Press.

———. (1995b). The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol 2: Modern Applications. Cambridge University Press.

———. (2000). The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol 3: Supersymmetry. Cambridge University Press.

———. (2008). Cosmology. Oxford University Press.


  1. Harris (2010).

  2. Carroll (2003), Carroll (2010), and Carroll (2012).

  3. Dawkins (1976), Dawkins (1986), and Dawkins (2006).

  4. Ladyman, Ross, Spurrett, & Collier (2007).

  5. Ross (2000), Ross (2005), Ladyman et al. (2007), and Ross (2010). Published after this workshop: Ross, Ladyman, & Kincaid (2013).

  6. Rosenberg (2011).

  7. Rosenberg (2008), Rosenberg (2011), and Rosenberg (2012).

  8. Sellars (1963), p. 1.

  9. Flanagan (1991), Flanagan (1992), Flanagan (2007), and Flanagan (2011).

  10. For example, see DeDeo (2010) and DeDeo (2011).

  11. Deacon (1997) and Deacon (2011).

  12. Russell (1957).

  13. Nagel (1974).

  14. Goldstein (1983), Goldstein (2005), and Goldstein (2006). Published after this workshop: Goldstein (2015).

  15. Dennett (1992), Dennett (1995), Dennett (2003), and Dennett (2006).

  16. Pigliucci (2000), Pigliucci (2002), Pigliucci (2006), and Pigliucci (2010). Published after this workshop: Pigliucci (2017).

  17. For example, Hickok & Poeppel (2007) and Lau, Phillips, & Poeppel (2008).

  18. Coyne (2004) and Coyne (2009).

  19. Weinberg (1967).

  20. Weinberg (1977), Weinberg (1992), Weinberg (1995a), Weinberg (1995b), Weinberg (2000), and Weinberg (2008).

  21. Levin (2002) and Levin (2006).